similar to: Performing an action on mail receipt

Hello list. I''ve configured a very simple script to slow down packets coming from a particular IP Address. I''ve used IPTABLES to mark traffic coming from this IP Address, but it does not appear to be working as expected. Let me first describe my system as maybe what I''m doing is beyond what NETFILTER can do. I have one machine that runs all my servers as

Hi all, Since the mail list receives a lot of repeated subjects (for example: "i have two adsl lines..."), maybe these specific issues should be treated on the LARTC Guide, or maybe if we had an wiki? Is there a LARTC Wiki? If not, what do you think about creating one? Thanks -- Marco _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl

On Fri, 2015-06-26 at 09:40 -0600, Shawn Heisey wrote: > On 6/26/2015 5:48 AM, Andrew Beverley wrote: > > I'm configuring some Sieve scripts for virtual users. I'd like to keep > > the Sieve scripts somewhere "sensible". > > > > Currently, all the mail goes into /var/mail/vhosts/<domain>/<mailbox> > > > > So I thought a good

# iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m mark --mark ! 0 -j ACCEPT iptables v1.3.3: Bad MARK value `!'' I''m puzzled, what''s wrong with this syntax? kernel is 2.6.15.7-ubuntu1 Thanks Francesco

Sir, I have one 2 MB link which I have to distribute to 200 people. Caching may enchance performance. Kindly suggest packages for this purpose under GPL. Regards, Rayudu. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

After varying degrees of success with p2p detection modules, I would like to write the following rules using iptables to reliably identify p2p traffic: 1. If a host on the network has 5 or more simutaneous tcp connections to ports above 1024, mark all connections to ports 1024 and above as 60. 2. If a host has received (or sent) UDP packets from 5 different hosts'' ports above 1024 in a

Hi I believe that whole question is in topic. Is there any way to recognize ( and then shape ) p2p traffic which is encrypted? Modern p2p clients have this ability moreover some of them have this enabled by default. Now I''m using ipp2p for iptables but as I know this doesn''t recognize encrypted traffic. Thanks in advance. Pozdrawiam Szymon Turkiewicz

Hi, I''m trying to divide my bandwidth between different services, but I''d like to take into account the number of active users. For example, l want divide my bandwidth between HTTP and SMTP and guarantee HTTP 80% of the bandwidth. However, I have many users on my system (tens of thousands) and if only 1% of my active users are using HTTP (and the other 99% SMTP), I''d

I do this manually: smbmount //Beverley/C /home/data pwd: "insert pwd" cp -ruv /home/samba/public /home/data smbumount /home/data This lets me do the following: make a copy of all my samba shares on the server to a client named Beverley C drive. ruv does the following recursive (all subdirectories and subfolders) unchanged (only write over when newer) verbose pwd: "insert

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10636 Summary: Feature request: Show current source path on receipt of Posix signal Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at

Hi What is the best option to notify a user that a message has arrived? The intention is to write a script that connects to a jabber server and checks if the user is online, so then a message is sent to user notifying him that he has received a new message. The solution should be compatible with Sieve filtering, so the script should not be executed when the message is moved to the SPAM folder, or

Hello, we are developing a library to show last arrived messages of all threads in a folder with more than 300k messages. As per the RFC 5256, the IMAP thread command has only the option to specify the grouping criteria (REFERENCES vs ORDEREDSUBJECT). So we implemented an algorithm which gets the full UID SORT ordered by date in reverse order then gets all thread relations and then post

Hello, I'm using dovecot 1.1.1 and dovecot-sieve-1.1.5 . I'm very interested in the notify plugin, I've tried many code which have generated some errors (coding errors that have been arrived in the .dovecot.sieve.err) but these errors are fixed. But Notify is still not working, I've the following in mail.log :deliver(webmaster at xxx.net): SIEVE ERROR: Unknown [unimplemented]

Hi, Just a question, the rate values use for configure a class, are they a IP rate or a Ethernet rate ? Thanks, Edouard. _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lartc

Hi, I've just upgrade from Debian Wheezy to Debian Jessie and am getting: Fatal: master: service(lmtp): child 6761 killed with signal 11 (core dumped) It seems to be something to do with sieve. When I disable that from lmtp then everything works fine. OS: Debian Jessie Dovecot version: 2.2.13 CPU: x86 This is the gdb output: Using host libthread_db library

Hi We are getting the following error message on Samaba 2.2.0 on AIX 4.3.3:- lib/debug check_log.size (437) File/var/samba/log.smbd failed - using console write_socket_data: write failure. Error = Broken Pipe Can you help please. Robin Smith Technical Director Reflex Data Systems Ltd CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE This email and any attachments should be read only by

I'm configuring some Sieve scripts for virtual users. I'd like to keep the Sieve scripts somewhere "sensible". Currently, all the mail goes into /var/mail/vhosts/<domain>/<mailbox> So I thought a good place for the sieve script might be in there as well, for example: /var/mail/vhosts/example.com/username/sieve Is there any reason *not* to store the sieve scripts

Il 26.10.2015 12:04 Teemu Huovila ha scritto: > On 26.10.2015 12:44, Frederik Bosch | Genkgo wrote: >> Teemu, >> >> If just need the http request, I will need something like the >> following configuration, right? So no meta data plugin, but with >> notify and push_notification? >> >> protocol lmtp { >> mail_plugins = $mail_plugins notify

Do not forget to add the "Copying conditions" to the RFC. Check http://wiki.debian.org/NonFreeIETFDocuments That page contains a section titled "Template for RFC authors to release additional rights". To follow that guideline a section like the following should be added: x. Copying conditions The author(s) agree to grant third parties the irrevocable right to

In order to simplify auto-response suppression and other filtering, I want to synthesise an Auto-Submitted header on notification mails that should have them but do not. In a sieve file I add the following: if anyof ( header :contains ["From","Sender"] ?info at example.com" ) { if header :contains "Subject" [" just joined "," just left