similar to: Released Pigeonhole v0.4.3 for Dovecot v2.2.13.

Hello Dovecot users, Pigeonhole development has slowed down significantly in the last few months due to the fact that I got swamped in work. The plan is now to move active development of Pigeonhole to Dovecot v2.0, meaning that this will be the last release for v1.2 that contains significant development changes and new features. However, if a certain new feature is simple enough and there is

Hello Dovecot users, Pigeonhole development has slowed down significantly in the last few months due to the fact that I got swamped in work. The plan is now to move active development of Pigeonhole to Dovecot v2.0, meaning that this will be the last release for v1.2 that contains significant development changes and new features. However, if a certain new feature is simple enough and there is

Hello Dovecot users, It's been a while since the last Pigeonhole Sieve and ManageSieve releases. That is why this release includes quite a few changes. Most interestingly, the include extension is updated to match the most recent specification, the Sieve interpreter now includes plugin support and ManageSieve now has support for enforcing quota on the size of scripts, the number of

Hello Dovecot users, It's been a while since the last Pigeonhole Sieve and ManageSieve releases. That is why this release includes quite a few changes. Most interestingly, the include extension is updated to match the most recent specification, the Sieve interpreter now includes plugin support and ManageSieve now has support for enforcing quota on the size of scripts, the number of

Hello, I'm testing dovecot replication alongside pigeonhole and liking it. Dovecot v2.2.13 Pigeonhole v0.4.3 If I create or edit a sieve script on one server (via managesieve, using the thunderbird plugin as it happens) then it does get replicated to the other - great! However, if I set a script to be active (SETACTIVE) on one side then this is not being replicated across to the other

Hello all, I am trying to build pigeonhole from source but get the following (only error output) : ../../src/lib-sieve/.libs/libdovecot-sieve.so: undefined reference to `mail_get_backend_mail' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [sievec] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make: *** [all] Error 2 Output further shows following

Hello Dovecot users, The recent release of Dovecot v1.2.15 is a good opportunity to release new versions of Sieve and ManageSieve for Dovecot v1.2. These releases consist entirely of bugfixes and introduce no new features. Changelog Sieve v0.1.18: - Imap4flags: fixed segfault bug occuring in multiscript context. Occured in specific situations when a script using imap4flags was

Hello Dovecot users, The recent release of Dovecot v1.2.15 is a good opportunity to release new versions of Sieve and ManageSieve for Dovecot v1.2. These releases consist entirely of bugfixes and introduce no new features. Changelog Sieve v0.1.18: - Imap4flags: fixed segfault bug occuring in multiscript context. Occured in specific situations when a script using imap4flags was

Are you sure you have deleted mails and not just Trashed mails? Aki On 26.07.2018 19:23, Johan Huldtgren wrote: > hello, > > on the wiki, https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox, it says that one can > use either doveadm fetch or doveadm import, however I can find no correct syntax > with fetch that'll actually work. Is the idea to simply override the > mail_location

Hi! I've got a segfault in managesieve while using: sieve_extensions = -vacation -reject -spamtest -virustest -enotify -redirect The problem seems to lie in "-redirect". Reason for excluding "redirect" from sieve is my users should not use sieve to forward or redirect mails but use an external method (web-script to set LDAP attribute) which checks several things like

Hi, I am trying to use dovecot replication for a two-way sync. And whatever I do, sieve-scripts won?t replicate. Mails replicate near instantaneous. When I disable the sieve-script in roundcube, the other server will create in the home of the user on the other side a folder sieve/tmp but enabling won?t create the roundcube.sieve and the symlink .dovecot.sieve -> sieve/roundcube.sieve The

Server: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS 32bit There seems to be an incompatibility when compiling Pigeonhole against Dovecot v2.2.13.rc1. # make check with Pigeonhole throws up the following error message: <snip> Test case: ./tests/extensions/editheader/addheader.svtest: 1: Test 'Addheader - first' SUCCEEDED 2: Test 'Addheader - last' SUCCEEDED 3: Test 'Addheader - framed'

hello, on the wiki, https://wiki2.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/dbox, it says that one can use either doveadm fetch or doveadm import, however I can find no correct syntax with fetch that'll actually work. Is the idea to simply override the mail_location with -o ? That seems to work for doveadm mailbox but not for doveadm fetch or search # doveadm -f table mailbox status -u johan all dovecot

Hello, Thanks for all the replies. I've added a mailbox to the namespace definition for the public folders. I can do a doveadm acl get -A "Public/general" works but "Public/TestFolder" does not. Here's my 90-public.conf file: #cat 90-public.conf # Public mailboxes namespace { type = public separator = / prefix = Public/ location =

Hello Dovecot users, I have finally finished the first release of Pigeonhole for Dovecot v2.0. The most notable change from previous Dovecot v1.2 Sieve/ManageSieve releases is that all is now integrated in a single package and there is no need to patch Dovecot anymore to gain ManageSieve support. Changelog v0.2.0: * Merged Sieve and ManageSieve packages into a single Pigeonhole

Hello Dovecot users, I have finally finished the first release of Pigeonhole for Dovecot v2.0. The most notable change from previous Dovecot v1.2 Sieve/ManageSieve releases is that all is now integrated in a single package and there is no need to patch Dovecot anymore to gain ManageSieve support. Changelog v0.2.0: * Merged Sieve and ManageSieve packages into a single Pigeonhole

Maybe this thread can help you with your first question : https://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2014-August/097488.html On 13.4.2020. 20:52, David Mehler wrote: > Hello, > > Before I get in to my question is ssl on 993 or starttls on 143 better > from a security perspective? > > I've noticed that I've got a dovecot listener on port 993, below is my > doveconf -n

Hello Dovecot users, I've been busy recently with some wholly unrelated Dovecot IMAP patches, so Sieve development moved a bit into the background. This release therefore consists mostly of small bugfixes. The most important change is the fix of a bug in ManageSieve's CHECKSCRIPT command that causes a segfault. Quite a few people have encountered this problem recently, so it is about

Hello Dovecot users, I've been busy recently with some wholly unrelated Dovecot IMAP patches, so Sieve development moved a bit into the background. This release therefore consists mostly of small bugfixes. The most important change is the fix of a bug in ManageSieve's CHECKSCRIPT command that causes a segfault. Quite a few people have encountered this problem recently, so it is about

On April 25, 2020 2:35:20 AM GMT+02:00, David Mehler <dave.mehler at gmail.com> wrote: >Hello, > >I'm trying to set up a public folder called TestFolder. I'm getting >this error: > >#doveadm acl get -A "Public/TestFolder" >doveadm(username at example.com): Error: Can't open mailbox >Public/TestFolder: Mailbox doesn't exist: Public/TestFolder