similar to: dkim test

------------------------------------------------------------------------ *From:* Kishore Potnuru [mailto:kishore.reachme at gmail.com] *Sent:* Tuesday, May 5, 2020, 4:02 PM *To:* Benny Pedersen; Dovecot Mailing List *Subject:* Urgent - Help needed > > I am using pop3/imap, see the below file. We can't verify any logs? > This is working fine from last one year. as part of testing we

I am using pop3/imap, see the below file. We can't verify any logs? This is working fine from last one year. as part of testing we just stopped the services for 20minutes and restarted the dovecot and postfix server using "service <dovecot/postfix> stop/start". No issues so far... I would like know, if the application is reading the emails from the server, do we have any log

Hi All, Please find the requested details: [root at testserver new]# doveconf -n # 2.2.10: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.10.0-693.17.1.el7.x86_64 x86_64 Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.4 (Maipo) xfs disable_plaintext_auth = no listen = * log_path = /var/log/dovecot.log mail_location = maildir:/kw/home/pop/%d/%n/Maildir/ passdb { args = /etc/dovecot/passwd driver =

Hi, -- This message refers to the maillist itself rather than to dovecot software -- I have noticed that when I post to this list (only), I get DKIM Verification failure reports from: root at moncton.sidefx.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job 4D27B5DC4E on mail.sidefx.com") root at mail.rmacd.com (e.g. for my last post: "DKIM failure report for job

On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: > fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, A general broad mailing list whitelist will be problematic, do work it needs to look for specific list type hidden headers, spammers and nasties will incorporate those headers into their trash that impersonates

On 2/10/19 3:46 PM, Michael A. Peters via dovecot wrote: > On 2/10/19 3:42 PM, Noel Butler via dovecot wrote: >> On 10/02/2019 12:49, Benny Pedersen via dovecot wrote: >> >>> >>> fixing mailman will be the fail, solve it by letting opendkim and >>> opendmarc not reject detected maillist will be solution, >> >> >> A general broad mailing

Hi Benny and Dovecot, Thanks for the reply. Actually my question is, is it possible to verify anything now whether the email has been pulled by application/server from the "Maildir/new" or "Maildir/cur" folder in my POP3 server? at present I am not using lmtp yet. When I configured the outlook to access the one of the email box in the server, I get the email. But do we have

Can?t dovecot authenticate against imap? What I need is to make smtp authentication balanced and keep everything in backend (private network) On 27 Mar 2015, at 13:29, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > Edgaras Luko?evi?ius skrev den 2015-03-27 12:21: > >> is it possible to configure configure haproxy to work with postfix >> sasl and dovecot auth like this:

I don?t want to allow public network facing servers to be able to reach passwords database. And I want to segregate roles of the servers. If I will setup dovecot locally I will still have to provide it access to database (eg. /etc/dovecot/dovecot-sql.conf.ext). On 27 Mar 2015, at 15:49, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > Edgaras Luko?evi?ius skrev den 2015-03-27 14:34: >>

> dovecot supports sieve, so why the need for procmail ? Because I already HAVE procmail recipes and know proemial. The point is to make what I have, work. > On Nov 9, 2015, at 22:49, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > > On November 10, 2015 6:36:00 AM Vicki Brown <vlb at cfcl.com> wrote: > >> Can anyone help? > > dovecot supports sieve, so why

18.07.2020, 14:30, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu>ratatouille skrev den 2020-07-18 13:20: > Commenting just ssl_min_protocol = TLSv1.2 seems to solve the problem. > So I have the default ssl_min_protocol = TLSv1 with means that the device running k9 is not supporting TLS 1.2 yet TLS 1.2 is enabled by default in Android versions 5.0 and newer. For earlier Android versions, K9

some senders on this maillist use a version of thunderbird that adds more then one references header and this imho breaks threading :( -- xpoint

On May 4, 2018, at 16:07, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > > outgoing mail should not be stored into root uid 0 And yet it is. > root: some-other-unix-login Root has been aliased for decades. This has no impact on where and how mutt stores the mail it sends as root out of root?s crontab. -- My main job is trying to come up with new and innovative and effective ways to

>From the config : auth_ssl_require_client_cert = no GMail empty vcard ... I have no ideas . so sorry. Coding snippets. What can I provide for you that will help? NOTE: it is pretty much the default config from Debian. Thank you, On Sun, May 24, 2020 at 9:29 PM Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > > On 2020-05-25 02:54, hanasaki at gmail.com wrote: > > Config has >

Thanks Benny. I should've said I saw AllowNets but in researching it looked like it expected a smaller comma separated list, not hundreds of IP blocks. Is that what you are using to accomplish this? Thanks, -Terry iPhone says Hello World! > On Sep 16, 2015, at 6:31 PM, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > > Terry Barnum skrev den 2015-09-17 02:32: > >> I've

I am using Mac OS X Server. OS X Server uses postfix with dovecot set as mail_transport. I want to add procmail to the mix. I cannot use the (typical) mailbox_command = procmail -a "$EXTENSION" because mailbox_transport = dovecot overrides any mailbox_command parameter and it is NOT Possible to change, remove, or otherwise vary the mailbox_transport on OS X server. I'm

Hello Aki and all, The below lines are in the dovecot config file. This seems to be the same as Aki's suggestion. correct? I have also double checked file perms, tried with several new key gens, several versions of thunderbird and created completely new thunderbird profiles. Thank you, ssl_cert = </etc/letsencrypt/live/...../fullchain.pem ssl_key =

On 2018-05-05 (06:52 MDT), Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > >> And yet it is. > > in muttrc you miss ~ or $(HOME)/something No. >> Root has been aliased for decades. This has no impact on where and how >> mutt stores the mail it sends as root out of root?s crontab. > > root user can read mail files for all unix users, thats your fail, maybe

On 12 Jul 2020, at 10:17, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > @lbutlr skrev den 2020-07-12 16:43: >> I an trying to write a sieve action that will take mail that is >> addressed to a user only it is filed in a mailbox (e.g. "Direct") if >> it is to the email AND to any other email address, then file it in a >> mailbox named, e.g. "Cc". And

I will install cyrus-sasl and see how it goes. Anyway, it would be nice to have same features (authentication agains imap) in dovecot. On 27 Mar 2015, at 16:27, Benny Pedersen <me at junc.eu> wrote: > Edgaras Luko?evi?ius skrev den 2015-03-27 14:58: > >> I don?t want to allow public network facing servers to be able to >> reach passwords database. And I want to