similar to: sieve pigeonhole vacation filter responding when recipient is not explicitly listed

Hi, I am trying to setup dovecot replication based on: http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Replication http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/087674.html I know that 2.1.7 is dated, but I would refrain from upgrading, if not necessary. The problem I have is pretty much same as the one described in http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2013-January/087674.html: I have vmail user on both

Hi, I have mentioned before that we have added some sdt dtrace probes in SAX, our APL interpreter. Encouraged by Angelo and Jignesh, I have created a small document (5 pages) describing our experience with it, together with some problems we have encountered and some scripts we use for pretty-printing dtrace outputs. The said document can be found at

Dovecot :? 2.0.19 (see config at http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=KMaQ9Ccc) Postfix :? 2.9.6 (see config at http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=EEeevHfk) I'm trying to get Dovecot and Postfix working on Ubuntu 12.04LTS but am not having much luck. The problem is that although mail gets delivered to the correct place, however pointing a MUA of any description at Dovecot just yields a purportedly empty

hi all, i have a problem with storing the current quota in mysql. the configuration of the dictionary quota mostly looks like the example from the wiki. the dirsize quota limit is read correctly from the user_query, but nothing stored with quotadict in the quota table. i wonder that there is nothing like a "dict" in the logfile. did i configured anything wrong? regars stefan logfile

Hello List, after the last update I have a selinux "Problem" with dovecot. My system is a centos 7. After a new start from dovecot selinux block a connection. Jul 12 16:24:24 mx01 systemd: Starting Dovecot IMAP/POP3 email server... Jul 12 16:24:54 mx01 systemd: Started Dovecot IMAP/POP3 email server. Jul 12 16:24:54 mx01 dovecot: Warning: Corrected permissions for login directory

Hi, I am running Dovecot (dovecot-0.99.11-2.EL4.1 on centos 4) and we are switching from newer machines. I copied all usernames from /etc/passwd,/etc/group and /etc/shadow to the new machine. I do not want that every user has it's own /home/$user directory.. When I test my dovecot installation with a telnet 'servername' 110 user test pass test I get this error:

Hi, I setup a test envirement on a dedicatet server. OS: debian stretch samba: 4.5.8 smbclient: 4.5.8 I set it up as DC, the provision work well, yes I've delete the smb.conf in advance. When I test kinit I got an kerberos ticket, but I've problems with smbclient either I use kerberos or password auth. Myabee someone could help me? my smb.conf: # Global parameters [global]

Dear Dovecot Users/Admins/Mailing-List First of all I would give a big thanks for your great work ! I may need your help to find out what?s going on with my replication and shared mailbox problem. I setup a full active/active servers with : * Postfix * Dovecot * MariaDB (automaticaly balanced/failover between the 2 host within DRBD and Heartbeat) * SpamAssassin * Clamav * Sieve *

We are setting up a Dovecot over a pair of NFS which mirrored with DRBD +Heartbeat, under Debian Etch AMD64 with Kernel 2.6.22-5. The problem was slow header downloading rate. We had tried to use postal to inject 500 emails which are under 5KB each, but when ever we start up Mail.app, Thunderbird or even OE6, the header download rate is terrible slow. Its look like a few sec for just 1

Hi, after upgrading from 2.0.18 to 2.1.1 I noticed that I could not use shared folders with mutt anymore. 2.1 lists the shared namespace prefix once per user sharing an folder in LIST "" "%". I also noticed, that with 2.1 the user folder (Shared/<username>) is no longer tagged as \NoSelect. Is this the intended behaviour and mutt simply cannot cope with it or is it a

I updated to CentOS 4.5 yesterday and now I am finding the snmpd daemon is logging reams and reams of these messages: May 20 10:40:03 mx01 snmpd[2572]: Connection from - 127.0.0.1 May 20 10:40:03 mx01 snmpd[2572]: transport socket = 12 Is there a way to turn off this useless logging? I am getting these every 5 minutes (every time MRTG updates my MailScanner statistics). So far what I tried

Hi! I tried to use the sieve vacation plugin, but we're facing a little problem: our user's addresses are <uid>@<domain>, and if they want to use imap and sieve, they can have a forward to <uid>@imap.<domain>. The return-path, and hence the address the vacation message is sent to, is then <uid>@<domain> and not the original sender of the message. Is

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi Dovecot list, In my setup I have several email addresses that uses same account. When I set a vacation the answer is not necessarily send from the destination address. I propose to use the addresses found in addresses (if one match) as From address in vacation reply. I've made a little patch who do that [1]. Best regards. [1]

Op 23-10-2017 om 14:51 schreef David Zambonini: > I have a situation where my LMTP RCPT TO: goes to a mailbox user account that > does not reflect either the final (through aliasing) or envelope email address. > > SMTP RCPT TO: (envelope-local-part at envelope-domain) > Final Recipient: (final-local-part at final-domain) > LMTP RCPT TO: (mailbox-local-part at

I am getting these errors[1]. With fairly default setup where sendmail is delivering mail via lmtp. Adding these, do not seem to make a difference. Should I add something to the sendmail configuration? sieve_vacation_dont_check_recipient = no sieve_vacation_use_original_recipient = no [1] discarding vacation response for implicitly delivered message; no known (envelope) recipient address

I want a way to send VAR messages without having to specify up front all of the addresses for which such VARs should be sent. I realize this goes against rfc 3834, but it seemed reasonable to add a tag to the vacation command to skip the [to, cc, bcc, ...] recipients check. The patch I made is attached. The new usage with this patch is: vacation [":days" number] [":subject"

Hi! I'm struggling with the following error: Aug 4 21:32:00 mx02 dovecot: imap(xxx at xxx.tld)<17693><w14vpU+PCCSwPxpo>: Error: Mailbox INBOX: Broken file /home/vmail/xxx.tld/xxx/dovecot-uidlist line 6246: Invalid data: Aug 4 21:49:22 mx02 dovecot: imap(xxx at xxx.tld)<21879><YNhW40+PLoBOGLlU>: Error: Mailbox INBOX: Broken file

I have a situation where my LMTP RCPT TO: goes to a mailbox user account that does not reflect either the final (through aliasing) or envelope email address. SMTP RCPT TO: (envelope-local-part at envelope-domain) Final Recipient: (final-local-part at final-domain) LMTP RCPT TO: (mailbox-local-part at mailbox-domain) I'd like to use the final recipient as the vacation address, but also

In the same vein, I am receiving forensic DMARC reports from mx01.nausch.org. Whenever I send a message to the mailing list or when my server sends a DMARC report, I'm getting a DMARC Forensic report. It's odd, because the actual report tells me both DKIM and SPF (in the the of a DMARC report) pass... Here is what I am getting : This is an authentication failure report for an email

Hello, I update my dovecot to the last Version, now I have this error in the audit Log. Can any tell me what I can do, without selinux disabled // SELinux hindert /usr/sbin/dovecot daran, mit getattr-Zugriff auf Datei /proc/ sys/fs/suid_dumpable zuzugreifen. ***** Plugin catchall (100. Wahrscheinlichkeit) schl?gt vor ************** If you believe that dovecot should be allowed getattr