similar to: NFS not responding generates authantication crash

HI, I'm pulling my hair out a little trying to get dovecot to save it's index locally rather than in the NFS mount. No matter what I do it seems to save the indices in the Maildir on the NFS. I'm using dovecot 2.0.18 on CentOS 6.3. The relevant config I'm using: mmap_disable = no dotlock_use_excl = no # only needed with NFSv2, NFSv3+ supports O_EXCL and it's faster

Hi A new setup Windows client fails to authenticate to my Samba server (3.0.24-SerNet-RedHat). What I see in log at level 10 is: Got user=[SA-MC-SMSNS@corproot.net] domain=[] workstation=[MSISMSSRV01P] len1=24 len2=122 The empty domain seams to be origin of the problem, for other systems working OK this field is not empty. The Windows client is: NativeOS=[Windows Server 2003 R2 3790 Service

Hello, I tested some things, and found the following: when the kernel image file is present, but the initrd image is not, ONERROR is not called, and PXELINUX stays in the prompt forever ... Other error scenarios tested okay, a down/unresponding TFTP server can lead to 15-20 minutes delay until all tried filenames timeout out ... Just to let you know :) Andreas -- "The problem is not

On 08/31/2015 01:39 PM, Mark Selby wrote: > I have seen some talk about this but have not seen any answers. I know > this is a problem on CentOS 7.1 and I also think it is a problem on > CentOS 7.0. > > Basically if I have an NFS client only config - meaning that the > nfs-server.service is not enabled then I have to wait 60 seconds after > boot for the 1st NFSV3 mount to

Hi I have several Samba servers which have been running for almost two years without any problem. Recently I rebooted one of those servers and have the following problem: the join to the domain is OK but all user authentications fail. I mean nobody can "connect" a share. The system I rebooted is half of a two node cluster, the other node with exactly the same configuration, up 230 days,

I have seen some talk about this but have not seen any answers. I know this is a problem on CentOS 7.1 and I also think it is a problem on CentOS 7.0. Basically if I have an NFS client only config - meaning that the nfs-server.service is not enabled then I have to wait 60 seconds after boot for the 1st NFSV3 mount to succeed. What I can surmise is the following. I attempt to perform a NFS

Hello list, I have a problem with an NFS server for my network. It has ran kernels 2.4.18-ac4 - 2.4.21-ac1, all with problems. The -ac patches are used to provide the new style quota support. The system seems to have gotten even less stable with the new kernel versions. This morning around 5 am, I got a page the system was unresponding to NFS requests. I ssh'd in, and found the loadavg

That is the thing - rpc.statd does have rpcbind a pre-req. It looks like systemd is not handling this correctly. Just wondering if anyone knows a good way to fix. root at ls2 /usr/lib/systemd/system 110# grep Requires rpc-statd.service Requires=nss-lookup.target rpcbind.target On 8/30/15 7:45 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: > On 08/31/2015 01:39 PM, Mark Selby wrote: >> I have seen some talk

Dear all, I've tried to setup a directory share with SAMBA using the option security=domain. Infact I want that all the users' authentication is forwarded to an NT PDC without making UNIX users or mapping such users to NT domain ones. Anyway I had my Linux machine in the domain (through the PDC), then I used smbpasswd -j <DOM> -r <PDC>. After all, starting nmdb and smdb, I

Hello, i have two questions about pam and ldap: i want to set up a samba-ldap PDC. I first installed a samba compiled with the --with-ldapsam option. I set up a directory with users and samba attributes: every thing works fine. Now, i want to set up an equivalent architecture, but with the pam support. in the man pages, i can read that i need > obey pam restrictions = Yes which implies the

Hi, pam's auth section are always ignored, when using "encrypt passwords = Yes". But you can still use the account and session sections when you set "obey pam restrictions = Yes" J?rgen > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: samba-bounces+hoetzel=cyperfection.de@lists.samba.org > [mailto:samba-bounces+hoetzel=cyperfection.de@lists.samba.org] > Im

[ adding klibc ml to cc ] On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 09:29:52AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > > It appears to be largely undocumented, but a review of > /usr/share/initramfs/scripts/nfs shows that this package supports NFSv2 > and v3 only. I don't know why v4 isn't supported. yup, this needs nfs v4 support in klibc nfsmount. would be could to get that soon postetch, but someone

Hi, I've never been using NFS before, but I'm going to need it. I gathered some documentation (Deployment Guide, RHEL 5 Unleashed, general NFS docs) and I have a few machines to experiment with. After about two hours of reading and experimenting, I must admit the documentation is confusing, to say the least. Although some step-by-step tutorials are provided, none of them work. For

Hi, The following set of patches is intended mostly to improve ipconfig and nfsmount compatibility with glibc. The context: I'm working on yaird, an alternative to mkinitrd, and currently implementing nfs root file systems. This is based on ipconfig and nfsmount from klibc, with a rewritten version of kinit. Users should be able to build the package with vanilla glibc, since klibc is not

Hi Stephen, I use ext3 with kernel 2.4.14. I'm happy to have verified that nfs+ext3 in journal mode doesn't provide atomic write for the user point of view. My program writes sequential records of 64KB in a file through a nfs mount point. The blocks of data are initialized with a serie of integer: 1, 2, 3 ... I kill the nfsd daemons while two instance of the program are writing their 600

Just two fixes: - dovecot-uidlist file is now assumed to be changed if it's modify time is changed. before we relied on inode changing which isn't fully reliable. - mbox dotlocks sometimes incorrectly thought someone else had overridden them Known problems that I should fix: - mbox: we don't necessarily notice message flag changes by external programs (or another dovecot without

Hi, I've seen some chatter on NFS boards about kqueue being more reliable than inotify when used in NFSv3 and NFSv2. The chatter is a bit old so I don't know if it is true anymore. Anyone have pro/con experience with dovecot on the inotify/kqueue question when using NFS storage? I realize that kqueue is probably a bit slower and causes some delay with IDLE. Also, it may not really

Hello, I'm migrating from 1.1.16 running in 4 debian lenny servers virtualized with xenserver and 1 core and 5GB of RAM to 2.1.5 running in 4 ubuntu 12.04 servers with 6 cpu cores and 16GB of RAM virtualized with VMWare, but I'm having lots a performance problems. I don't think that virtualization platform could be the problem, because the new servers running in xenserver has

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Background: Large NFS/mail server. Dual PIII/1GHZ. 4GB memory. Mylex AcceleRAID 352 RAID controller (uses DAC960 driver). Intel eepro100 network cards. RedHat 7.3 with all errata. Kernel-2.4.18-5smp. 2GB of memory is used by a RAM disk for mail queue. ext3 filesystems (switched to ext2 to see if that helps). one large (100GB data partition).

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi all! when I activate wondershaper on my dsl connection (pppoa vc mux), i get three errors: # sh -x /usr/sbin/wshaper ppp0 + /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_downlink + DOWNLINK= + /usr/sbin/xmlstarter setenv tc_uplink + UPLINK= + [ -z ] + cat /proc/avalanche/avsar_modem_stats + grep Connection Rate + awk {printf("%d", $8)} +