similar to: Sieve vacation attach original message

Hi, is this already fixed? https://www.dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot/2017-July/108688.html If so, which version of Dovecot includes fix for this? Thanks for info. azur

Op 28-1-2020 om 19:20 schreef azurit at pobox.sk: > Really no more info? You could do something with the sendmail_path or submission_host settings. Regards, Stephan. > > > > > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > >> Thanks for idea but it won't work for me as 'internal domains' can be >> anything, including gmail.com (and i don't know which of them are

Thanks for idea but it won't work for me as 'internal domains' can be anything, including gmail.com (and i don't know which of them are really internal/local, this is decided by sending SMTP everytime something is sent, based on MX records). Problem is that Dovecot/Sieve is using wrong SMTP server (one used for receiving e-mails which should NEVER be used for sending [and

Folks, I'm using a Sieve script for vacation messages and there's something strange with it in certain cases. The script uses the "variables" extension to produce the "Re: [original subject] (autoreply)" subject line for the vacation message. All is well except for cases when that [original subject] is written in Russian. In those cases the subject string is

I'm using Dovecot's sieve extensions quite happily, they are very good! Thanks for all who worked on them. I have a question that maybe is appropriate for a sieve-specific discussion list, so if there is one I should post to instead, please let me know: I've poked through the sieve vacation RFC and all the documentation I can find and I cannot figure out how to do this. It's

Hi, in our setup, we have two SMTP servers: - one for receiving messages (this one is using Dovecot's LMTP for delivery) - one for sending messages (this one is used by our users as outgoing SMTP server) Only the first one has list of local domains, local e-mail accoutns etc. so the second one will ALWAYS use MX records for delivery - with this setup, we can allow to our users to

hi All, One of my users created this sieve script via roundcube's avelsieve implementation: # This script has been automatically generated by avelsieve # (Sieve Mail Filters Plugin for Squirrelmail) # Warning: If you edit this manually, then the changes will not # be reflected in the users' front-end!

> On July 11, 2017 at 11:50 AM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > > > > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > > > Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > > > >>> On July 10, 2017 at 1:45 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > >>> >

Hi, i would like to ask how _exactly_ are messages send using sieve filters, for example vacation responses. Which SMTP server is used? Where can i find log files? How should i debug delivery problems? Thank you. azur

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 10, 2017 at 1:45 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> >> >> On July 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> i'm trying to

Hi, i'm having problems with escaping user input in sieve scripts. I'm using 'variables' extension and i can't find out how to escape character '$' - i tried '\$' and '$$' but nothing helps. Any ideas? Thanks. azur

Cit?t Sami Ketola <sami.ketola at dovecot.fi>: >> On 12 Jul 2017, at 10.36, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> Backends don't have access to user database and i wanted to keep it >> like this :( > > Then probably your only possibility is to update last_login > information with the authentication > policy framework introduced in dovecot 2.2.25: >

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 11, 2017 at 7:51 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> is it possible to run a post-login script on proxy side? When a user >> is 'proxied' away, the standard post-login script seems to be skipped. >> I want to update last login datetime but only proxy has access to user

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: >> On July 10, 2017 at 12:33 PM azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> i'm trying to configure Dovecot proxy with user authentication on >> proxy side only, so backends will authenticate using master password >> (proxy is configured to send it). The problem is that Dovecot, on >>

Hi, i'm using Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian Wheezy) and output from LIST command looks strange: C: 4 LIST () "" (INBOX INBOX.Karantena INBOX.Spam) RETURN (STATUS (UNSEEN)) S: * LIST () "." "INBOX" S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Karantena" S: * STATUS "INBOX.Karantena" (UNSEEN 0) S: * LIST () "." "INBOX.Spam" S: * STATUS

Hi, is it possible to use 'doveadm expunge' with static user database? Or can i, somehow, tell dovecot the directory location where i need to do an expunge? Thank you. azur

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at dovecot.fi>: > On 2017-08-27 12:06, Harald Leithner wrote: >> Hi, >> >> It seams that IX didn't Motive Themen Version change. >> >> Thx >> >> Harald > > Try http://xi.dovecot.fi/debian.new/ > > Aki Hi, i always wonder why is anyone using this repository? There is a big warning in the wiki that

Hi, i'm trying to configure Dovecot proxy with user authentication on proxy side only, so backends will authenticate using master password (proxy is configured to send it). The problem is that Dovecot, on backends, is telling me that i need to configure at least one auth mechanism: auth: Fatal: No passdbs specified in configuration file. LOGIN mechanism needs one The master auth

Cit?t Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com>: >> On 28 March 2019 17:46 azurit--- via dovecot < dovecot at dovecot.org> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> does hibernation works well with proxy? Are proxy connections >> hibernated or not? >> >> >> azur > > hibernation

Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > Cit?t azurit at pobox.sk: > >> Cit?t Timo Sirainen <tss at iki.fi>: >> >>> On 29 Nov 2018, at 15.46, azurit at pobox.sk wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> is this a know problem? Newest Dovecot 2.3.4 package from >>>> repo.dovecot.org , Debian Stretch (fully upgraded).