similar to: No speed improvement with FTS for iOS 7?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 12/1/12 12:57 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > > I believe LLVM should drop support for Python 2.4 and 2.5 for 2 main reasons: > > 1) Python 2.4 and 2.5 are end-of-lifed > 2) Python 3 is coming Entering the discussion a bit late, but I'd like to make a plug here for using Cython for any official Python bindings. There are numerous

Hello, Am Donnerstag, 15. März 2012, 21:15:02 schrieb Gregory Szorc: > There was some talk on IRC last week about desire for Python bindings to > LLVM's Object.h C interface. So, I coded up some and you can now find > some Python bindings in trunk at bindings/python. Currently, the > interfaces for Object.h and Disassembler.h are implemented. FYI: I recently startet working on

Compiz 0.9.14.0 has been officially released today. Major changes in this release include: - Development has switched from Bazaar (back) to Git [1]. - CCSM has been ported to PyGObject, GTK 3 and Python 3. - compizconfig-python has been ported from Pyrex to Cython. - Restored the Color Filter plugin by porting it to the new plugin API. - Added support for loading configuration from multiple

Hi folks, I'm trying to call an R function (fisher.test) in my program for like a billion times! Though my program is in Python and I feel that using rpy2 to interface R to python doesn't give me satisfactory performance. So I looked into R code and found out that fisher.test is actually a wrapper around another function called fexact which is implemented in C. Using Cython I managed to

On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 4:41 AM, Dan Sanduleac<sanduleac.dan at gmail.com> wrote: > Oh, I see. Didn't think of this, thanks! > > So, just to be clear, there's no binding overhead in Cython because the > functions defined there are pure python, right? (The function objects I > mean). Whereas the ones I defined in Boost are more expensive to call. > > On Wed, Aug

Hi, We switched from dovecot 0.99.something to 1.0-stable (on FreeBSD 4.10) a few days ago and have been seeing many errors and one corrupted mailbox so far. Almost everyone uses mbox format, and most users primarily use SquirrelMail; I use Apple Mail and Thunderbird, as well as accessing the mailboxes locally with Mutt, and have not noted any visible problems. There have been several of

I'd like to continue the discussion about minimum Python versions from the "Use multiprocessing instead of threading" thread in its own thread because I feel it warrants additional discussion. In that thread, we were discussing maintaining support for Python 2.4 and 2.5. The latest response is: On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Daniel Dunbar <daniel at zuster.org> wrote: >

There was some talk on IRC last week about desire for Python bindings to LLVM's Object.h C interface. So, I coded up some and you can now find some Python bindings in trunk at bindings/python. Currently, the interfaces for Object.h and Disassembler.h are implemented. I'd like to stress that things are still rough around the edges, so use at your own risk. I intend to smooth things over in

I was getting some weird errors from gccld and traced it to path construction in isBytecodeLPath. If the path doesn't end with a /, then Path just tries to stick filenames onto it, which is not so good. It would be more efficient to just add a "/" to the path once, I guess. Also, I had to touch lib/System/Path.cpp to get my changes to Path.inc noticed; it seems the build system

gccld passes -shared through if it's generating a shared library, but if you're compiling a program that needs to have its symbols externally accessible, it doesn't pass -export-dynamic through to gcc for the final link. The attached patch fixes this. I've tested with a small test case I sent Chris, and with Python; both seem to work. I also fixed some inaccurate comments in

On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 05:13:15PM -0500, Nicholas Riley wrote: > The attached patch fixes this. ...but had tabs in it. Misha kindly reminded me off-list that this was bad. Try this one instead. -- Nicholas Riley <njriley at uiuc.edu> | <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/njriley> -------------- next part -------------- Index: tools/gccld/GenerateCode.cpp

Hi, I'm trying to migrate a user from Outlook.com IMAP to Dovecot. I'm using a setup similar to that on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/Dsync: imapc_host = imap-mail.outlook.com imapc_user = [...]@hotmail.com imapc_password = [...] imapc_features = rfc822.size fetch-headers mail_prefetch_count = 20 imapc_port = 993 imapc_ssl = imaps imapc_ssl_verify = yes ssl_client_ca_dir =

If you didn't catch it, there has been a recent post to the mailing list that seems like it might be relevant to your interests: <http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2012-June/051298.html> Direct link to the project page: <http://code.google.com/p/pymothoa/> --Sean Silva On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Travis Oliphant <travis at continuum.io> wrote: > Hi all,

Hi all, First, I just want to say thank you for the excellent LLVM project. I have been playing with LLVM for the first part of this year and have been quite impressed with what I've seen and what is possible. I've been coding for a long time, but haven't had this much fun since I first learned Python. The work you have done has opened the door for a tremendous amount of

I'm trying to convert from an old Dovecot (1.0.15) and mbox to a new Dovecot and maildir. I'm running into several problems with dsync which are causing my mboxes not to convert. If I use LAYOUT=fs (as I'd prefer) I get an error because I have a mailbox called "subscriptions", and none of my messages convert. Is there a way to get dovecot to put its own metadata in

I created a virtual mailbox which maps to a single physical mailbox (in Dovecot 1.x I did this with a symlink but had intermittent problems with Dovecot 2.0 doing the same.) However, I can only copy one message at a time into the mailbox. If I try to copy more, I get: 7.16 UID COPY 48531:48532 !/Saved 7.16 NO [CANNOT] Can't save messages to this virtual mailbox whereas this works fine:

Hello all. This is my very first message to the list. I have a TDM400P card, It has 2 FXO channels which are connected to extensions of my PBX (Ericsson BP250), so I can dial from any SIP softphone directly to physical (analog and digital) extensions on my company. My PBX is configured so when I dial 8 on any extension, it will redirect to the first free FXO channel on my TDM400P card.

We are two french students and we have a problem concerning an exercize. We don't know how to resolve it. It would be fantastic if someone can help us. Thanks. Description: This study examined how the metabolic cost of locomotion varied with speed, stride frequency and body mass. Cost was determined by measuring oxygen consumption (?vo2?), analyzing the oxygen content in air inhaled and

Hi, The "+" prefix in dovecot-virtual does not seem to be documented. only discovered it because I tried to include a mailbox whose name began with + and Dovecot gave me an error when I tried to copy to it. I see it was added here: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-2.2/rev/be0f0de75e34 My dovecot-virtual file looked like this: !+/2014-03 +/2014-02 all I just added another + to the

Hi, Is there any way to hide this folder from IMAP clients? I can see it is not runtime configurable and just #defined as LUCENE_INDEX_DIR_NAME in fts-backend-lucene.c. -- Nicholas Riley <njriley at illinois.edu>