similar to: maildir quota divergence

Hi, I am running a logistic regression model and then cross-validating it. But, 10-fold cross validation returns with following error message. "Divergence or singularity in 5 samples" Actually, I tried reading definition of divergence and singularity, but could not understand it in context of my error. Could some one please explain it to me in simpler words. This also begs another

Hi all, x <- cbind(rnorm(500),rnorm(500)) KLdiv(x, eps=1e-4) KLdiv(x, eps=1e-5) KLdiv(x, eps=1e-6) KLdiv(x, eps=1e-7) KLdiv(x, eps=1e-8) KLdiv(x, eps=1e-9) KLdiv(x, eps=1e-10) ... KLdiv(x, eps=1e-100) ... KLdiv(x, eps=1e-1000) When calling flexmix::KLdiv using the given code I get results with increasing value the smaller I pick the accuracy parameter 'eps' until finally reaching

Hi there, I'm trying to find the KL divergence measure between a prior and it's posterior distributions, and I'm using the KLdiv method in the flexmix package. plese see the example below: require(flexmix) x=seq(-4,4,length=100) d1=dnorm(x,0,1) d2=dunif(x,-3,3) y=cbind(d1,d2) kl=KLdiv(y) but let say, x1=seq(-5,5,length=100) d3=dunif(x1,-3,3) y1=cbind(d1,d3) kl1=KLdiv(y1) Notice

Hi all, I have some wind data (U and V components) and I would like to compute Vorticity and Divergence of these fields. Is there any R function that can easily do that? Thanks in advance for any help Igor Oliveira CSAG, Dept. Environmental & Geographical Science, University of Cape Town, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch 7701. Tel.: +27 (0)21 650 5774 South Africa Fax: +27 (0)21

Hello guys, you'll will be happy to know that the current codebase now includes the divergence from randomness weighting schemes which are known to outperform a lot of known weighting schemes such as BM25. Thanks to the amazing mentorship of Olly Betts and Dan Colish, our search results will now be better than before and Xapian will be more preferred in the research community than it was

Hello guys, you'll will be happy to know that the current codebase now includes the divergence from randomness weighting schemes which are known to outperform a lot of known weighting schemes such as BM25. Thanks to the amazing mentorship of Olly Betts and Dan Colish, our search results will now be better than before and Xapian will be more preferred in the research community than it was

Hello, It seems to me that our current DivergenceAnalysis does not save which BasicBlocks may suffer from divergent control. Am I correct? I want to modify our DivergenceAnalysis to add a "bool isControlDivergent(BasicBlock*) const" method and save in the divergence propagator the basicblock that are divergent. I am not sure that is entirely correct, if you have input on that please

In message <20050731135919.GA43753@afields.ca>, Allan Fields writes: >Yes, this is all very nice, but when is someone actually going to >commit it? ;) I'm (as always) short of time, and GBDE is not the top priority for me for the time being. So I am more than happy to see people band together and improve gbde. The main work necessary is to polish the userland program and that

TL;DR This RFC is a joint effort by Intel and Saarland University to bring the divergence analysis of the Region Vectorizer [1,2,3,4,5] (dubbed the vectorization analysis of RV) to LLVM. The implementation is available on github for feedback [0]. The existing divergence analysis infrastructure in LLVM has conceptual limitations (structured control, SCEV based). The new analysis resolves bugs

Hello, Yes? Where is allActive defined, I couldn't find it. Basically, a BB is control divergent if it's execution depends on a branch that itself depends on a divergent ssa value. On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Zaks, Ayal <ayal.zaks at intel.com> wrote: > What would be the definition of “isControlDivergent(BasicBlock*)”; the > complementary of “allActive(BasicBlock*)” –

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. ------_=_NextPart_000_01C35A53.75780090 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Anyone have a clue why hclust() and agnes() produce different results in the example below when both use method="average"?? I'm not able to reproduce

Hi Owen and Vinod, Thanks for sharing the paper! I like the idea a lot. Regarding the paper itself, Vinod, are the consensual branches (e.g., cbranch.ifnone) you mentioned in the paper publicly available in PTX ISA? Owen, could you explain more on the approach of using branch-if-none instructions in your mind? I believe you have lots of great insights, but I don't see how cbranch.ifnone

*Hi, I am considering a language extension to Clang for optimizing GPU programs. This extension will allow the compiler to use different optimization strategies for divergent and non-divergent branches (to be explained below). We have observed significant performance gain by leveraging this proposed extension, so I want to discuss it here to see how the community likes/dislikes the idea. I will

In our experience, as Owen also suggests, a pragma or a language extension can be avoided by a combination of static and dynamic analysis. We prefer this approach in our compiler ;) Regards, Vinod On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 12:09 AM, Owen Anderson <resistor at mac.com> wrote: > Hi Jingyue, > > Have you considered using dynamic uniformity checks? In my experience you > can

Dear list, I'm using lattice::levelplot to plot a coloured image of 3D data. The range of the z values goes from negative to positive, but is not exactly centred around 0. I would however like to map a diverging colour scale with white falling exactly at 0, and both extremes being symmetrical in the legend to better contrast the opposite change in colour saturation. The following dummy

On Sep 1, 2010, at 12:27 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > On Sep 1, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Bob Wilson wrote: > >> >> On Aug 31, 2010, at 10:19 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> >>> Hi Argiris, >>> >>> The real problem here is that the X86 backend is turning datatypes like <1 x i64> into MMX operations, but doesn't do so in a safe way

Is there a way that is currently implemented to promote memory stores in two data paths to the same location to use registers and move the store to convergence point? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120330/56ec3359/attachment.html>

On Sep 1, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Bob Wilson wrote: > > On Aug 31, 2010, at 10:19 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >> >> Hi Argiris, >> >> The real problem here is that the X86 backend is turning datatypes like <1 x i64> into MMX operations, but doesn't do so in a safe way (it's not inserting the requisite EMMS instructions). After discussing this with Dale and

Hi, I was trying to make a density plot with 13 samples. To distinguish each sample, it would be good if each color is as different as possible from the other colors. I could use the built in function, but that does not do more than 8 colors and then goes back to recycling the cols. If I use a palette, then it is really difficult to distinguish between the colors. So, is there a way that I can

Dear List, I apologize in advance if this is silly. I tried to replicate an analysis I did previously in SPSS using R, and was surprised to find different results. So my question is: shouldn't the following SPSS syntax REGRESSION DEPENDENT INC89 /METHOD=ENTER hiedyrs experien SE93rec. Yeld the same results of the following R command modelB<-lm(INC89~HIEDYRS+EXPERIEN+SE93REC) I