similar to: Getting Director Proxy Working

Hi, I've been running dovecot for many years, but now i've hit a strange problem. when retrieving imap there is sometimes in 1 of 4 imap requests a 4sec latency. * notes: - connected directly to the backends this latency disappears - removing a director from the loadbalancer(lvs) so i'm the only connected to the director this latency disappears too I would appreciate some feedback

Hello, Following Jan-Frode's advise I am trying this configuration: {postfix} ---lmtp---> {director} ---lmtp---> {dovecot} so I have two dovecot instances for director/proxy and lmtp delivery on ports 1024 and 24 respectively. whilst for imap connections I can specify a pool of imap backend servers via 'director_mail_servers' it seems is not possible with lmtp. Sep 12

I'm using dovecot in a multi server setup. Two directors forward pop3, imap and smtp to backend dovecots with their central storage on NFS. Yesterday I stumbled upon these log lines: 2019-11-18 20:17:51 lmtp(17274): Info: Connect from 172.22.1.6 2019-11-18 20:17:51 lmtp(17274): Panic: file smtp-client-connection.c: line 1142 (smtp_client_connection_established): assertion failed:

Hi, we are getting some core dumps with signal 6 in ltmp on a dovecot director proxy server, like this: Dec 5 14:31:51 sproxy1 dovecot: lmtp(29999): Panic: file lmtp-proxy.c: line 376 (lmtp_proxy_output_timeout): assertion failed: (proxy->data_input->eof) Dec 5 14:31:51 sproxy1 dovecot: lmtp(29999): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0() [0x363323d99a] ->

Hi everyone, short version: Is there no built in failover mechanism for the director service to handle a backend failure? Long version: I have a frontend server running the director service and two backends. Due to maintenance I had to shut down one of the backends which caused connection errors for the users being directed to this backend. I was very surprised as I expected the director to

Hi @all, on Saturday I upgraded two dovecot servers from squeeze to wheezy and dovecot from 2.1.x to 2.2.5 (compiled from sources). After the upgrade everything worked fine at first. On Sunday Morning I recognized these errors (they occured after a reload for logging purpose on midnight) on one server: director: Error: Ring SYNC appears to have got lost, resending After reloading/restarting

Hi, After upgrading to dovecot 2.1.12, I see a lot of these errors: # 2.1.12: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 2.6.32-279.14.1.el6.x86_64 x86_64 CentOS release 6.3 (Final) # Filesystem: ext4 with mdbox storage Dec 10 15:21:04 mail dovecot: imap(user at example.org): Error: Cached message size smaller than expected (5010 < 8192) Dec 10 15:21:04 mail dovecot: imap(user at example.org):

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a dual stack server with Dovecot 2.1.10 listening on v4 and v6 Dovecot has a Comodo SSL certificate issued via NameCheap that works as expected with IPv4 in 10-ssl.conf I have enabled these configuraction directives: ssl = yes ssl_cert = < /path/to/file.crt ssl_key = < /path/to/file.key ssl_parameters_regenerate = 202 hours If I

Hi @all, after re-installing one of my two frontends/proxy-servers I get the following error messages after some time (sometimes after 1h, sometimes after 24h): 11:23:55 imap-login: Error: socketpair() failed: Too many open files 11:23:55 imap-login: Error: socketpair() failed: Too many open files 11:23:56 imap-login: Error: socketpair() failed: Too many open files 11:23:56 imap-login: Error:

I haven't done this on the old, working machine. So there must be a difference between Debian 7 and 9 how open files are handled? Regards Patrick Aki Tuomi schrieb: > You probably need to increase ulimit -n > > Aki > > > On 23.08.2017 14:10, Patrick Westenberg wrote: >> Hi @all, >> >> after re-installing one of my two frontends/proxy-servers I get

I plan on putting two dovecot directors in front of our backend dovecot pop/imap servers, instead of our current haproxy loadbalancing of the connections -- but how do we handle SSL in such a setup. Will all SSL be terminated on the directors automatically, and then proxyed plain text, or is there any configuration needed to achieve this ? Does it matter that the directors are v2.0 while the

Today I will try Dovecot Director for a setup using a Cluster Backend with GFS2 on rhel5, my question is if is Director stable for use in production for large sites, I know is mainly designed for NFS but I believe it will do the job also for a cluster filesystem like GFS2 and should solve the mail persistence problem with a node and locking issues. I plan to add a layer behind a load balancer to

I just upgraded my Ubuntu server from 11.10 to 12.04.1 and that upgraded Dovecot to 2.0.19. For some reason I'm getting a lot more (5 times) disconnect in IDLE and inactivity time outs. I'm using only IMAP with two users. Both users access the server from multiple devices, phone, tablet and desktop computer. I had previously set the max_userip_connections to 20 and rarely got the

Hi all; I've upgraded a ring of dovecot directors from 2.2.15 to 2.2.36. After the upgrade I've got some instability: a few time per day per server, seemly at random, the auth process stop responding and the clients cannot authenticate any more: Sep 6 14:45:51 imap-front13 dovecot: pop3-login: Warning: Auth process not responding, delayed sending initial response (greeting):

> On 25/08/2020 14:35 Robert Nowotny <rnowotny at rotek.at> wrote: > > > I get ZLIB Errors after dovecot upgrade from 2.3.10.1 to 2.3.11.3 > > > Aug 21 15:27:34 lxc-imap dovecot: imap(acsida)<63870><jZk...>: Error: Mailbox Sent: UID=40826: read(zlib(/home/vmail/virtualmailboxes/acsida/storage/m.2409)) failed:

We have a Dovecot installation of several nodes that share an NFS mount for the user data. We are trying to configure Dovecot Proxy with Director in order to have Director select the appropriate IMAP server for a given user on behave of Dovecot Proxy. So far all examples I've seen on the dovecot site require the proxy to know the exact mail server to pass the user to by way of an LDAP

Hello In my installation the disable_plaintext_auth does not appear to take effect. I can see that the value is correct using doveconf -a but it doesn't change anything. Whenever attempting to log in using IMAP I get this: * BAD [ALERT] Plaintext authentication not allowed without SSL/TLS, but your client did it anyway. If anyone was listening, the password was exposed. ls NO

hi we are using dovecot version 2.2.7 (config file given below) centos 6, qmail, vpopmail, mysql server configuration hex core processor, 16 gb ram 1 X 600 gb 15 k rpm for main drive and 2 X 2000 gb hdd for data (No raid) busy server with around 4000 email ids --- load is around 2 to 10 the issue is that SQUIRRELMAIL webmail users suddenly lose connection while they are working on the webmail.

Phillip> Users don?t create these folder. The system does based on the Phillip> configuration which is what I have to figure out. Then post your configuration details! And details on how email gets into the system and into Dovecot.

Hi All, Does anyone know how to disable the Director service. In our current running Dovecot 2.2.4, if the director configuration is commented out and Dovecot has no errors nor warnings. But the version 2.2.12 I'm testing with gives out fatal errors. We have dedicated Dovecot Director servers that serve the public frontend and separate dedicated imap/pop3 servers on the backend