Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "doveadm stats top exit with error"
2010 Apr 11
4
Virusscanning
Hello list,
I use currently a non-dovecot pop3 proxy which has the ability
to scan all passing mails for viruses. And I like dovecot.
I have to combine both.
One (and the only) idea is to call a virusscanner a shellscript,
installed as PostLoginScript.
But I see multiple disadvantages:
1. it's a shellscript which tents to be slow.
2. it's called *on* the mailbox-host, not on a dedicated
2016 Oct 31
0
doveadm stats top crash
Hi,when i start doveadm stats top it crash
Panic: key not found from hash
Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x9560e) [0x7fe0e5e5c60e] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x95688) [0x7fe0e5e5c688] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(i_fatal+0) [0x7fe0e5df496e] -> doveadm(+0x25290) [0x7fe0e6abb290] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(io_loop_handle_timeouts+0xfb)
2018 Nov 14
0
different TLS protocols on different ports
<!doctype html>
<html>
<head>
<meta charset="UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div>
<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>
On 14 November 2018 at 21:19 "A. Schulze" <
<a href="mailto:sca@andreasschulze.de">sca@andreasschulze.de</a>> wrote:
</div>
2018 Nov 14
3
different TLS protocols on different ports
Hello,
I'm providing IMAP+Starttls on port 143 for users with legacy MUA. So I've to enable TLS1.0 up to TLS1.3
For IMAPS / port 993 I like to enable TLS1.2 and TLS1.3 only.
Is this possible with dovecot-2.2.36 / how to setup this?
Thanks for suggestions,
Andreas
2017 Nov 23
3
set parameter per user
Steffen Kaiser:
> Is the detail delived to Dovecot by the MTA at all?
sure!
have to say: I faked that example. In reality I tested the inverse way:
My lab setup actually *do* deliver to folders and
I saw, setting lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox to 'no' still deliver to folder
while INBOX was expected.
so, correct hint: I should really try on an other system ...
But from my debug logs it
2014 Aug 12
4
namspace management
Hello,
since some weeks I'm playing with namespaces. But I still did nod
found a solution for all faces of different problems.
Current issue: Public namespace.
I have users inbox as follow:
mail_home = /data/mail/%Ln/
mail_location = maildir:~/Maildir:INDEX=~/.dovecot.index
namespace {
inbox = yes
separator = /
prefix = INBOX/
}
Public namespace:
namespace {
location =
2015 Jan 25
0
Indexing Mail faster
* Andreas Schulze <sca at andreasschulze.de> 2015.01.25 12:47:
> I assume you drop multiple mailing lists together in a mailbox and separate them using the virtual plugin, right?
> could publish how you configured dovecot virtual plugin?
The namespace "Virtual" will look for its configuration in the user's home directory:
namespace {
location =
2017 Nov 23
0
set parameter per user
> On 23 Nov 2017, at 15.32, A. Schulze <sca at andreasschulze.de> wrote:
>
>
> Steffen Kaiser:
>
>> Is the detail delived to Dovecot by the MTA at all?
> sure!
>
> have to say: I faked that example. In reality I tested the inverse way:
> My lab setup actually *do* deliver to folders and
> I saw, setting lmtp_save_to_detail_mailbox to 'no' still
2018 Feb 04
1
How to grant user access to his .dovecot.sieve.log?
Andreas,
can you explain "magic folder"?
The only thing I tried was creating named FIFO .dovecot.sieve.log, and
starting
mailx user at my.domain.com < .dovecot.sieve.log
which need to be done for each user of my domain, and better wrapped in
some script which will make it started after each sievec run.
--
Regards,
Sergey.
On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 7:23 PM, A. Schulze <sca at
2018 Nov 14
2
different TLS protocols on different ports
Am 14.11.18 um 20:22 schrieb Aki Tuomi:
> Not possible I'm afraid.
Hello Aki,
is it not possible in 2.2.36 or not possible at all?
I stumbled upon RFC 8314 *) and I found it a welcome option to enforce more modern protocols/ciphers.
IMAPS/SUBMISSIONS aren't used widely (at least to my knowlege, many postmaster used to configure IMAP+SUBMISSION and STARTTLS)
Switching Clients to
2018 Nov 14
0
different TLS protocols on different ports
> On November 14, 2018 at 12:46 PM "A. Schulze" <sca at andreasschulze.de> wrote:
<
> I stumbled upon RFC 8314 *) and I found it a welcome option to enforce more modern protocols/ciphers.
> IMAPS/SUBMISSIONS aren't used widely (at least to my knowlege, many postmaster used to configure IMAP+SUBMISSION and STARTTLS)
"IMAPS" has been used forever. Every
2020 Apr 14
1
got a listener on 993
> Le 14 avr. 2020 ? 18:57, A. Schulze <sca at andreasschulze.de> a ?crit :
>
>
>
> Am 13.04.20 um 20:52 schrieb David Mehler:
>> Hello,
>>
>> Before I get in to my question is ssl on 993 or starttls on 143 better
>> from a security perspective?
>
> implicit TLS is recommended: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8314#section-3
One rational for
2015 Jan 25
1
Indexing Mail faster
Thomas Leuxner:
> namespace {
> location = virtual:~/mdbox/virtual
> prefix = Virtual/
> separator = /
> }
>
> $ cat virtual/Flagged/dovecot-virtual
> *
> Public/*
> flagged
once setup correctly it works like expected :-)
> Another example, the one I used in the original reply, is 'gluing'
> together archives as a single view:
>
> $
2015 Jan 25
3
Indexing Mail faster
Thomas Leuxner:
> I have a view defined (virtual plugin) with around 22.000 messages in it
interesting.
I assume you drop multiple mailing lists together in a mailbox and separate them using the virtual plugin, right?
could publish how you configured dovecot virtual plugin?
I never had success on using the plugin in a useful way :-/
Thanks
Andreas
2018 Feb 01
4
How to grant user access to his .dovecot.sieve.log?
Hi,
What are the recommended ways to give access to their .dovecot.sieve.log
messages to the users?
I am thinking about placing this file into users Maildir/new, or piping
to dovecot-lda.
--
Regards,
Sergey Ivanov
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital
2016 Feb 13
2
ANNOTATE plugin? Squirrel uses it for EXPIRATION information
Hi,
it seems that Squirrel mail uses Mailbox annotations for storing Expire
times on the Server. It's an Cyrus server currently. (I've no clue how
cyrexpire is able to read it's information from the annotiations)
Does dovecot support some similiar mechanism? Or - does anybody know
anything about how it's supposed to work on Cyrus and how it can be
emulated/simulated with dovecot?
2018 Mar 30
0
debian lintian warn: hardening-no-fortify-functions
> On 30 March 2018 at 15:08 "A. Schulze" <sca at andreasschulze.de> wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> to build + packages dovecot I use the usual Debian tool chain. That includes build with selected GCC options and running lintian.
>
> I notice since a long time (read: many earlier versions, up to 2.2.35) this lintian warnings:
>
> I: dovecot-core:
2010 Feb 01
1
LMTP-Server: missing headers
Hello,
I just installed dovecot2-beta2 and configured the lmtp-server + postfix (no virtual users)
postfix:
mail_version = 2.7-20100117
mailbox_transport = lmtp:unix:lmtp-server
lmtp_assume_final = yes
dovecot:
service lmtp {
executable = lmtp
protocol = lmtp
unix_listener /var/spool/postfix/lmtp-server {
group = postfix
mode = 0660
user = postfix
}
}
Mail gets delivered to
2016 Jan 17
4
Running without anvil?
Hi,
I'm using dovecot as a local mail store on my laptop using preauth
tunneling. It turns out I almost don't even need to start dovecot at
all; the only reason it needs to be running is so that FTS indexing can
be invoked. And because I don't want it to run any services, I can run
it as an unprivileged user, so long as I turn them all off:
# We don't want to serve any
2018 Oct 24
0
doveadm backup: Error: Both source and destination mail_location points to same directory
Hello!
I'm using 2 namespaces, "inbox" for INBOX and it's subfolders and
"special" containing folders like Sent, Junk or Drafts.??Though both
use mdbox I decided to represent those namespaces in different
locations "mdbox:~/mail" and "mdbox:~/mail_special_folders". The main
reason to use 2 namespaces was to keep special_use folders out of INBOX
by