Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "2.2.10 - core dumps"
2014 Feb 09
1
Dsync crash (v2.2.10, sdbox+sis → mbox)
Hi,
I'm trying to use dsync to convert sdbox + sis mailboxes to mbox (mbox
is chosen here to "re-attach" the attachments to their original place)
# dsync -Dv -u $LOGIN -o
"mail_location=sdbox:/zfspool/clone_srv_mail/$LOGIN" -o
"mail_attachment_dir=/zfspool/clone_srv_attachments" backup
2017 May 22
0
core from 2.2.29.1
I've got this in my logfile, should I worry?
May 19 14:45:04 imap(liscia_mcs): Panic: file mail-index-transaction-update.c: line 19 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq)
May 19 14:45:04 imap(liscia_mcs): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x9cd16) [0xb7568d16] ->
2010 Mar 14
2
Dovecot 2.0beta3: Crash with mail_log plugin enabled
Latest from Mercurial. Dovecot crashes with 'mail_log' and 'notify' plugins enabled when deleting a message:
[08:22] root spectre:~# gdb /usr/lib/dovecot/imap /tmp/core
GNU gdb 6.8-debian
Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later <http://gnu.org/licenses/gpl.html>
This is free software: you are free to change and
2010 Mar 22
1
mbox + bzip2 +dovecot = crash?
I have some archived mails in compressed (by bzip2) mboxes and I would
like to read them via imap Unfortunately it looks like dovecot
crashes when tries to read them :(
#v+
kjonca at alfa:~/Mail/Old/Junk%sudo /usr/sbin/dovecot -n
[sudo] password for kjonca:
# 1.2.11: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# OS: Linux 2.6.32.7+2 i686 Debian squeeze/sid
log_path: /var/log/dovecot
2010 Aug 18
2
1.2.13 QRESYNC crash.
Aug 18 22:07:31 twosheds IMAP(dwmw2): : Panic: file mail-index-transaction.c:
line 637 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed:
(seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq)
* PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE SORT
SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT IDLE CHILDREN
NAMESPACE UIDPLUS
2014 May 12
0
dsync - Panic: file mail-index-transaction-update.c: line 19
Hi,
we have started to switch our users mails from mbox to maildir and see
for some users panics.
May be someone has a hint on whats causing that and how to fix it?
It's dovecot 2.2.10 on Redhat.
dsync(s109487): Error: Corrupted index cache file
/srv/vmail/s109487/mail/.imap/GS Drehbuch 1/dovecot.index.cache: Broken
physical size for mail UID 42
dsync(s109487): Error: mail parser:
2008 Jul 03
2
assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq)
Hi guys,
Anyone know what this error with deliver is (v1.1.1)?
2008-07-03T09:45:19+01:00 mail4 deliver(alexander): Panic: file
mail-index-transaction.c: line 642 (mail_index_transaction_lookup):
assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq)
Seen a few of these this morning.
Mark
--
Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader
Product Development *
2008 Oct 20
5
SIGBART/SIGSEGV while SELECTing virtual folder
Hello!
I just installed Dovecot's latest nightly build (20081020) and tried the
virtual folder features. I started with a really simple "all" folder:
| # virtual/all
| *
| all
But selecting this folder causes dovecot to panic (in most cases).
While trying to debug this, I got slightly different results and I am
not really sure yet if this is just non-deterministic, depends on
2007 Jul 23
1
postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.base.i386.rpm vs postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.plus.i386.rpm
Hi,
what are the differences between
postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.base.i386.rpm vs
postfix-2.2.10-1.1.el4.centos.mysql_pgsql.plus.i386.rpm. Changelogs are
the very same and there's no announcement.
Thanks,
David Hrb??
2014 Jan 02
1
Problem building dovecot 2.2.10 with pigeonhole 0.4.2
Hi,
I am on CentOS 5.10 x86_64 and I am trying to build RPMs for Dovecot
2.2.10 with pigeonhole 0.4.2.
I am getting an error that autogen.sh is missing from pigeonhole 0.4.2
source (as available from:
http://pigeonhole.dovecot.org/releases/2.2/dovecot-2.2-pigeonhole-0.4.2.tar.gz):
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.89185: line 92:
2014 Jan 31
2
Dovecot 2.2.10 shared mailbox
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello all,
I've just upgraded my dovecot from version 2.1.7 to 2.2.10 and since
then I encounter errors when I'm enabling SHARED MAILBOX:
here is part of dovecot.conf:
....................
mail_plugins = $mail_plugins zlib expire acl
namespace {
type = shared
prefix = Shared.
separator = .
list = children
2014 Feb 27
0
Error "Initializing mail storage ..." after upgrading to 2.2.10
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 Feb 2014, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
> But on one mailbox I do get an error:
>
> Error: user rechnnugseingang-animationsinstitut: Initialization failed:
> Initializing mail storage from mail_location setting failed
>
> Error: Invalid user settings. Refer to server log for more information.
Is above error the
2014 Apr 03
0
dovecot 2.2.10 & fts_lucene: Failed to initialize backend
Hey there.
Lurking most of the time here, currently I'm trying to make FTS work?
2014 May 14
0
Error open(/var/lib/dovecot/db/shared-mailboxes) after update 2.2.10 -> 2.2.13
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 May 2014, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
> I did an update from dovecot 2.2.10 -> 2.2.13 and now I'm getting errors:
>
> May 14 10:40:00 imap(hansdampf): Error:
> open(/var/lib/dovecot/db/shared-mailboxes) failed: Permission denied
>
> Currently the permissions on shared-mailboxes rw-rw-rw but teh error
>
2015 Aug 15
0
Multidomain / IP Address Setup (Dovevot 2.2.10 on CentOS7 ) is failing: Fatal: Couldn't parse private ssl_key: error:0906D06C:PEM
### CORRECTION
Am 15.08.2015 um 03:22 schrieb dravion.smith at gmx.net:
>
> #### BUT ####
> If i try something like this in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf
>
> local imap.mydomain01.tld {
> protocol imap {
> ssl_cert =
> </etc/ssl/domains/mydomain01.tld/imap/imap.mydomain01.tld.crt.pem
> ssl_key =
>
2015 Aug 15
0
Multidomain / IP Address Setup (Dovevot 2.2.10 on CentOS7 ) is failing: Fatal: Couldn't parse private ssl_key: error:0906D06C:PEM
>I think you should post doveconf -n output.
with your dovecot -n output provided this mail would not need to be sent
>On 08/14/15 20:30, dravion.smith at gmx.net wrote:
>>
>> ### CORRECTION
>> Am 15.08.2015 um 03:22 schrieb dravion.smith at gmx.net:
>>>
>>> #### BUT ####
>>> If i try something like this in /etc/dovecot/conf.d/10-ssl.conf
2015 Aug 15
2
Multidomain / IP Address Setup (Dovevot 2.2.10 on CentOS7 ) is failing: Fatal: Couldn't parse private ssl_key: error:0906D06C:PEM
Am 15.08.2015 um 08:16 schrieb Christian Kivalo:
> [snip]
>
> Note that you will still need a top-level "default" ssl_key and ssl_cert as well, or you will receive errors.
>
> in addition to your two domain specific ssl certs have you also defined a "default" ssl_key and ssl_cert as required as required by the documentation?
>
> regards
> - c
Did you
2015 Aug 15
0
Multidomain / IP Address Setup (Dovevot 2.2.10 on CentOS7 ) is failing: Fatal: Couldn't parse private ssl_key: error:0906D06C:PEM
Am 15. August 2015 08:58:04 MESZ, schrieb "dravion.smith at gmx.net" <dravion.smith at gmx.net>:
>
>Am 15.08.2015 um 08:16 schrieb Christian Kivalo:
>
>> [snip]
>>
>> Note that you will still need a top-level "default" ssl_key and
>ssl_cert as well, or you will receive errors.
>>
>> in addition to your two domain specific ssl
2015 Oct 13
1
Problems sync with mail client MAC and dovecot-2.2.10-4.el7_0.1.el7_0.1.x86_64
Hello,
i have installed Centos 7.1.1503 with Dovecot 2.2.10-4.el7_0.1. With
Thunderbird all works fine, but when i configure the email client of Mac
(Yosemite) with IMAP i can see a error in the log and the client not see
the emails:
Oct 9 14:31:34 localhost dovecot: imap(xxxxxxx at xxxxxxx): Fatal: master:
service(imap): child 18639 killed with signal 11 (core dumps disabled)
I have read the
2015 Nov 25
2
CentOS rpm dovecot 2.2.10 auth/db-ldap.c TLS bug/patch
Hello,
CentOS rpm dovecot 2.2.10 ?ontains bug auth/db-ldap.c TLS (not connect
LDAP+TLS server ldaps://), exist bug/patch
https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=8267
As far as the correct patch in upstream dovecot quite a lot of changes
at this point if there is a correct patch?