similar to: using OR in doveadm search query

Hello, I found out an unexpected behaviour of search queries with mixed "AND" and "OR". With search query "\( condA OR condB condC \)" I get an error: Fatal: Use parenthesis when mixing ANDs and ORs if I switch left and right OR-part and use the query "\( condB condC OR condA \)" I get a result, but it is not the expected result of the query "\(

Hi, We store our mail archive in a tree of subfolders. I am trying to speed up text searching on our mail archive but when running "doveadm -D -v index -u neil shared/Exalon/Aandeelhouders" the following output is produced: doveadm(neil): Debug: Loading modules from directory: /usr/lib/dovecot/modules doveadm(neil): Debug: Module loaded:

On 14.12.2016 12:18, Juergen Raschke wrote: > Hello, > > > I found out an unexpected behaviour of search queries with mixed > "AND" and "OR". > > > With search query "\( condA OR condB condC \)" I get an error: > Fatal: Use parenthesis when mixing ANDs and ORs > > if I switch left and right OR-part and use the query > "\( condB

Hi, I'd like to propose extending the supported syntax for AssemblerPredicates to allow sets of SubtargetFeatures to be listed, but where only one in the list has to be enabled for the predicate to be true. The condition string which forms a AssemblerPredicate already allows multiple features to be defined, separated by commas, and this means all of these features must be present. For

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 3:41 PM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > Thanks for the answers! The plan makes sense to me. > > Regarding phis, what about diamonds, e.g.: > > > define i32 @f(i32 %x) { > br .., label %bb0, label %bb1 > bb0: > %cmp = icmp sge i32 %x, 0 ; x > 0 > br i1 %cmp, label %bb2, label %bb3 > bb1: > %x2 = add nsw

Hi all, Is it planned to add support of rotations to IR? Thanks, Aleksey Zasenko -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151119/c897b935/attachment.html>

> Yes, this happens because your SOLR server is reporting 500 Internal > Server Error. Do you mean this is normal behaviour of dovecot? I have the impression it causes dovecot to stop indexing all other mailboxes. -- Willem-Jan de Hoog

Hi, A question. We are using fts_solr. When searching for content in BODY I noticed that dovecot only supports full words. "BODY calibration" returns results but "BODY calibra" does not. Nor "BODY calibra*". Solr does support searching with wildcards so why is it that dovecot does not? regards, -- Willem-Jan de Hoog

Greetings I have been trying to use metaplot to create a forest plot of my meta-analysis results. My data is in the form of ORs, so I've been inputting the ORs as the point estimate (mn) and the SEs of the logORs as the SE (se). However, whilst the point estimates appear to be displayed properly, many of the confidence intervals go below zero (not possible for an OR, as far as I know). I

On Sun, Feb 5, 2017 at 12:25 PM, Nuno Lopes <nunoplopes at sapo.pt> wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Many thanks for working on this! > SSI/e-SSA is the only way I'm aware of for doing efficient sparse > analyses, so I'm definitely in favor of adding support for it in LLVM! > > I read the discussion so far and did a cursory review of the patches, and > I have just a

Hi, While running doveadm index on a mailbox this gets printed: doveadm(neil): Error: fts_solr: Indexing failed: 500 Internal Server Error doveadm(neil): Panic: file http-client-request.c: line 792 (http_client_request_send_payload): assertion failed: (ret == 0) doveadm(neil): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x88662) [0x7f0a52750662] ->

I have a command I execute: awk 'BEGIN { ORS=" " } { print "\"" $1 "\"" }' input_file which gives me exactly what I need, all field one's in quotes on one line each separated by one space. I now need to print a single quote around all of this, but the ORS flag is screwing me up, it's causing every attempt I try to repeat for every record.

I have not found an easy way to compress a file on filesystem. Especially I'd like to compress a pdf from pdf() function/device. Is it possible to compress It on the flight? I'd like to do something like: pdf(gzipconnection()) dev.off() If It is not possible, how can I create a gzip with the pdf? Thanks Daniele A. ________________________________ ORS Srl Via Agostino Morando 1/3

Hi R help list I'm simulating logistic regression data with a specified odds ratio (beta) and have a problem/unexpected behaviour that occurs. The datasets includes a lognormal exposure and diseased and healthy subjects. Here is my loop: ors <- vector() for(i in 1:200){ # First, I create a vector with a lognormally distributed exposure: n <- 10000 # number of study subjects

I''m already successfully testing before_filters in application_controller courtesy of this blog post: http://www.movesonrails.com/articles/2008/01/23/spec-ing-your-application-controller However, i can;''t work out how to test the sort of method that is added to application_controller so that all controllers can use it. It must be something simple that i''m doing

Hello! I noticed that in some cases clang generates sequence of AND+TST instructions: For example: AND x3, x2, x1 TST x2, x1 I think these instructions should be merged to one: ANDS x3, x2, x1 ( because TST <Xn>, <Xm> is alias for ANDS XZR, <Xn>, <Xm> -

Hi, does anyone know of a function to calculate odds ratios in multiway tables (stratified) (+ the other usual statistics involved) i mean: say we have a table r*c*d, For every d (depth) we have a r*c table, and in this table the odds ratio's are calculated for every 2*2 subtable in it. logically this function would look like): ORs(multiwaytable) or ORs(data$var1r,data$var2c,data$var3d)

I have data for different items (ID) in a database. For each ID I have to get: - Timestamp of the observation (timestamp); - numerical value (val) that will be my response variable in some kind of model; - a variable number of variables in a know set (if value for a specific variable is not present in DB it is 0). To get to the above mentioned values I have to cycle

I have just uploaded an updated version of my boolean package (v1.05), which should be propagating through CRAN's mirrors soon. Boolean permits estimation of Boolean logit and probit models (see Braumoeller (2003), full reference in help file, for derivation). Boolean logit and probit are a family of partial-observability n-variate models designed to permit researchers to model causal

I have just uploaded an updated version of my boolean package (v1.05), which should be propagating through CRAN's mirrors soon. Boolean permits estimation of Boolean logit and probit models (see Braumoeller (2003), full reference in help file, for derivation). Boolean logit and probit are a family of partial-observability n-variate models designed to permit researchers to model causal