similar to: auth: Error: net_accept() failed: Too many open files

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "auth: Error: net_accept() failed: Too many open files"

2015 Mar 26
1
Error: open() failed with file /var/vmail/... Too many open files
Hello guys we have Dovecot 2.0.19 and we are getting those errors opening files of dovecot Too many open files, we?ve tried to increase limits in /etc/security/limits Wih ulimits ?a core file size (blocks, -c) 0 data seg size (kbytes, -d) unlimited scheduling priority (-e) 0 file size (blocks, -f) unlimited pending signals (-i) 63735
2010 Aug 19
1
Dovecot 2.0 and BSDI 4.X
All right, I am trying to migrating to 2.0 but running into problems. from my typescript: Script started on Wed Aug 18 23:24:58 2010 doctor.nl2k.ab.ca//usr/home/doctor$ tail -f /var/log/maillog | egrep dovecot Aug 18 23:25:31 doctor dovecot: master: Dovecot v2.0.0 starting up (core dumps disabled) Aug 18 23:25:31 doctor dovecot: log: Error: net_accept() failed: Invalid argument Aug 18 23:25:31
2014 Jan 16
0
[Dovecot auth crash]
Hi, I have a problem with dovecot auth and i don't know what happen .. running dovecot 2.1.7 When i try a login with user there is a crash in auth process: Jan 16 02:56:52 az-mail14 dovecot: auth: Panic: file auth-request.c: line 618 (auth_request_is_disabled_master_user): assertion failed: (request->requested_login_user != NULL) Jan 16 02:56:52 az-mail14 dovecot: auth: Error: Raw
2011 Mar 24
3
Dovecot 2.0.9: Thunderbird 3.1.9: Very slow while open sent folder with many (4k>) mails
hi, one customer told us, that he has performance problem in his Thunderbird 3.1.9, while open his sent folder, which has round about 4000 mails in it, and 20k in his Inbox. For example TB, tries to sync the sent-folder list (over SSL) from the sent folder for now over 15min. In the log, I can't see any strange things, so for me, Dovecot works ok. Maybe, I should use better cache options?
2012 Jun 08
1
2.1.7 altmove not working
Hi list, I've just set up a 2.1.7 server, and have migrated a couple of accounts across from a 2.0.15 server, keeping the old configs. I have a strange problem on the new box in that altmove just doesn't work. I have my main storage under /home/email, indexes under /home/indexes and ALT under /home/email_archive. When I run the altmove command, the following broken symlink is created
2015 Nov 17
0
lmtp panic
Gentlemen, imap hits the same problem Nov 17 14:02:06 mx10 dovecot: imap(oleg.vasilyev at bgoperator.com): Panic: file mail-index-util.c: line 37 (mail_index_uint32_to_offset): assertion failed: (offset < 0x40000000) Nov 17 14:02:06 mx10 dovecot: imap(oleg.vasilyev at bgoperator.com): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x8215e) [0x7f8c8ce0915e] ->
2015 Nov 23
0
lmtp panic
Timo, -rw------- 1 vmail vmail *1,7G* ????. 16 22:54 ./mailboxes/noreply-05-08-2015/dbox-Mails/dovecot.index.cache the largest one Best regards, Sergey Schwartz Senior System Administrator Biblio Globus Tour Operator www.bgoperator.ru T: +7 495 5042500 ext 1532 E: sergey.schwartz at bgoperator.com 21.11.2015 04:25, Timo Sirainen ?????: > Do you have a huge >4GB dovecot.index.cache
2010 Oct 10
9
Dovecot 2.0.5 and BSDI 4.3 again
Right, Changes made to dovecot-2.0.5/src/lib-master/master-service.c conn.listen_fd = l->fd; conn.fd = net_accept(l->fd, &conn.remote_ip, &conn.remote_port); i_error("conn.fd: %d",conn.fd); i_error("l->fd: %d",l->fd); i_error("&conn.remote_ip:
2015 May 06
0
dovecot-proxy with managesieve, director and backend dovecot imap
hi all, I've been tasked to add sieve/managesieve to an existing dovecot cluster running 2.1.7 on debian wheezy which is made up of 2 dovecot-proxy hosts as directors and some back end dovecot imap hosts all running the same version. My problem is that I thought to put the service on the director/proxy hosts since they wouldn't have too much load on it, but when I do I get the
2015 Nov 13
2
lmtp panic
root at mx10:~# doveadm force-resync -u oleg.vasilyev at bgoperator.com noreply-05-08-2015 doveadm(oleg.vasilyev at bgoperator.com): Warning: fscking index file /srv/vmail/current/bgoperator.com/oleg.vasilyev/storage/dovecot.map.index doveadm(oleg.vasilyev at bgoperator.com): Warning: mdbox /srv/vmail/current/bgoperator.com/oleg.vasilyev/storage: rebuilding indexes doveadm(oleg.vasilyev at
2012 Nov 06
1
Auth USER lookup failed
Hello, I'm running dovecot 2.1.9 and I'm trying to configure shared folders. So, as described at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared I have configured a namespace like this: namespace { type = shared separator = / prefix = shared/%%u/ location = maildir:%%h/Maildir:INDEX=~/Maildir/shared/%%u subscriptions = no list = yes } In one user (user1) I have configured ACLs
2015 Nov 21
2
lmtp panic
Do you have a huge >4GB dovecot.index.cache file? > On 17 Nov 2015, at 13:04, Sergey Schwartz <sergey.schwartz at bgoperator.com> wrote: > > Gentlemen, > > imap hits the same problem > > Nov 17 14:02:06 mx10 dovecot: imap(oleg.vasilyev at bgoperator.com): Panic: file mail-index-util.c: line 37 (mail_index_uint32_to_offset): assertion failed: (offset <
2013 Jul 02
0
Dovecot METADATA plugin configuration
Debian Wheezy dovecot 2.2.4 (deb http://xi.rename-it.nl/debian/ stable-auto/dovecot-2.2.patched main) dovecot-metadata-plugin v14 /var/lib/dovecot 777 dovecot:dovecot /var/lib/dovecot/shared-metadata 700 dovecot:dovecot /var/run/dovecot 777 dovecot:dovecot /var/run/divecot/dict 666 mail:dovecot Test1 - create calendar UTF7 mailbox (no errors in
2015 Jun 11
0
Replication: "cross-updates" of mail meta-data
Hello I have a two-server dovecot setup using replication. Each server runs two dovecot instances, one for director and another for the backend. Initially I set up a single server, got it all working, then rsync'd the data and index partitions to the new one and started the clusters (I used rsync as a way to speed-up dovecot's initial replication). Both servers listen on a virtual IP
2020 Sep 07
0
Btrfs RAID-10 performance
Here's a few tips: 1. I assume that's a 2U format -24 bays.?You only have 1 raid card for all 24 disks ? Granted you only have 16, but usually you should assign 1 card per 8 drives. In our standard 2U chassis we have 3 hba's per 8 drives. Your backplane should support that. 2. Add more drives 3. Get a pci nvme ssd card and move the indexes/control/sieve files there.? On Monday,
2014 Jun 13
2
Dovecot and Postfix - dovecot doesn't create sockets
Hi, Problem: Sockets /var/spool/postfix/private/auth and /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-lmtp are not created The only error message I get comes from postfix: no auth (SASL) founhd. Takes np wonder, the s ockets don't exist. Any help is welcome. Thanks. Bernd doveconf: # 2.1.17: /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf # OS: Linux 3.11.10-11-default x86_64 openSUSE 13.1 (x86_64) ext4
2014 Oct 22
2
High I/O wait with Dovecot POP3
Hello, In the past we've had 4 loadbalanced servers configured with courier pop3 and dovecot handling respectively POP3 and IMAP connections. These 4 servers have a shared NFS storage on a Netapp FAS3220 controller with SAS disks. This setup is handling 50 POP3 sessions per second without any problems. Now we're installing 6 new loadbalanced servers to do the same job on the same
2014 Nov 16
1
UNIX perms appear ok (ACL/MAC wrong?)
Hi, I am struggling with Postfix/SASL/Dovecot-IMAP setup with ~/Maildir/ setup. Receiving the mail works fine, but viewing the mail(+listing) is failing. The setup I use is simple unix users from etc/passwd, (pam thru SASL) as I only host for a few people. The ~/Maildir folder has the ownership of the user, not mail or vmail, as I would have expected from the master.cf from Postfix, the
2013 Dec 12
1
what's wrong with this config file?
Hi. I'm setting up a new IMAPS server. Mail users don't have login access to the box but will each have unique UNIX-style UIDs: no back-end database or LDAP thing. So far. Their mail will get delivered to UNIX-style mailboxes in /var/mail/%u (where %u is the UNIX username obviously). Their IMAP folders will go in /var/imap/%u. These will contain subfolders once everyone migrates to the new
2020 Sep 07
2
Btrfs RAID-10 performance
Dne 07.09.2020 v 12:43 Sami Ketola napsal(a): >> On 7. Sep 2020, at 12.38, Miloslav H?la <miloslav.hula at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I sent this into the Linux Kernel Btrfs mailing list and I got reply: "RAID-1 would be preferable" (https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7b364356-7041-7d18-bd77-f60e0e2e2112 at lechevalier.se/T/). May I ask you