similar to: I have a question regarding the virtual scsi adapter.

-----Original Message-----From: John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> Reply-to: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] SCSI drives and Centos 7 Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 13:31:11 -0700 On 4/29/2017 12:42 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > what does `lspci` have to say about this raid card ? > > John, > > Thanks for the prompt

Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 10:17:55 -0400 > On Apr 29, 2017, at 9:50 AM, Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at PoMec.Net> wrote: > > find a way to make the installation disc of Centos 6 identify the SCSI > drives. What model LSI card? Is that card on the RHEL hardware support list? Does LSI/Dell have drivers on their site? Have you tried drivers from LSI/Dell and using the dd(driver disk)

Hey, I am testing Glusterfs as a storage backend for dovecot as a LDA and imap server. I have seen similar lines in the logs to these: May 21 10:46:01 mailgw dovecot: imap(eliezer at ngtech.co.il): Warning: Created dotlock file's timestamp is different than current time (1400658105 vs 1400658361): /home/vmail/ngtech.co.il/eliezer/Maildir/.Mailing_lists.ceph_users/dovecot-uidlist May 21

Since I have lots of filtering rules in thunderbird I was thinking of using sieve instead. I want to filter incoming mail into subdirectories. like "from" store at folder "old". the script is: require ["fileinto", "envelope"]; if envelope :is "from" "eliezer at test.dom" { fileinto "old"; } else { # The rest goes into

On 4/29/2017 12:42 PM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > what does `lspci` have to say about this raid card ? > > John, > > Thanks for the prompt : > > lspci demonstrates : > > 02:01.0 RAID bus controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID (rev 01) > 02:02.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7902B U320 (rev 10) > 02:02.1 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7902B U320

OK So i took the time and finally built a RPM for the softether vpn server and client. I have not tested them for usage but I found out that only the server side can work with multiple protocols while the client side works only with one protocol. The actual protocol is called "ethernet overl HTTPS". More info on the product: http://www.softether.org/ The gui is only for windows as

Hey John, I do not require encryption at all, it's a secure and internal channel but it requires me to connect via either pptp or l2tp. This is the reason I am asking. I had the chance of finding the SoftEther Project which gives a lot in terms of VPN Client and Server. At: http://www.softether-download.com/en.aspx But yet to try it. Also they have all sorts of beta versions but not

On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Gregory P. Ennis <PoMec at pomec.net> wrote: > Thanks for your help. I did not want to replace this machine with new > equipment, but it looks like I may need to do just that. > > Here are the results with respect to the lsi raid board for : > > lspci -nn > > > 02:01.0 RAID bus controller [0104]: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic MegaRAID

I'd be looking at your logs to see if there is any indication why the wifi does not come up during boot > sudo journalctrl -b # current boot > sudo journalctrl -b -1 # previous boot Kal On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer at ngtech.co.il> wrote: > NetworkManger should work pretty nice and good as required. > Just run the right cronjob every

You could say the same thing about computers in general: I hate them, they automated many tasks in life and took many jobs out of the market!. Eliezer ---- Eliezer Croitoru Linux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: eliezer at ngtech.co.il -----Original Message----- From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Gary Stainburn Sent: Monday, January 16, 2017

I hate to bring up the raid card wars again, but... :) It's pretty well established that 3ware is a good "real" hardware raid card for SATA drives. So what is a good card for SCSI raid? My searches have come up with Adaptec and LSI as the main players here. Are the LSI MegaRAID cards "real" hardware raid? Which cards can give good raid 5 performance? -- Bowie

Author: cz147101 Repository: /hg/zfs-crypto/gate Revision: a0a1d0c8868e9d02c246eee283f447c052b5aceb Log message: 6317422 lsimega should support LSI MegaRAID 320-2e adapter Files: update: usr/src/pkgdefs/SUNWlsimega/postinstall

Hello, I noticed the default megaraid_sas driver version in upstream Linux 2.6.32.25 is pretty old, version 4.01, and it seems to be very buggy. It fails to bring up disks and boot fails. Many people have reported this issue on various hardware using LSI RAID adapters, and on various Dell servers (R310/R410/R510/R710) using Dell PERC H700 RAID adapters (which are rebranded LSI adapters).

Hello, I noticed the default megaraid_sas driver version in upstream Linux 2.6.32.25 is pretty old, version 4.01, and it seems to be very buggy. It fails to bring up disks and boot fails. Many people have reported this issue on various hardware using LSI RAID adapters, and on various Dell servers (R310/R410/R510/R710) using Dell PERC H700 RAID adapters (which are rebranded LSI adapters).

Hey Gordon, I do not have any security issue in this network. I need to connect to a remote network on a secure network. The options are pptp or l2tp(no ipsec encryption) so I do want to use l2tp like in (lac\lns) and I am looking for a client for CentOS. Note that it works in ubuntu so it is possible to achieve the same with CentOS but I do not know what is behind the gui that initiates the

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Eliezer Croitoru <eliezer at ngtech.co.il> wrote: > I am unsure I understand what you wrote. > "XFS will create multiple AG's across all of those > devices," > Are you comparing md linear/concat to md raid0? and that the upper level XFS > will run on top them? Yes to the first question, I'm not understanding the second

-----Original Message-----From: John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> Reply-to: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> To: centos at centos.org Subject: Re: [CentOS] SCSI drives and Centos 7 Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2017 11:19:38 -0700 On 4/29/2017 10:49 AM, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: > I am remote from the unit today, and do not have a good way to look at > the board today, but the

On Wed, January 18, 2017 4:24 am, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > You could say the same thing about computers in general: > I hate them, they automated many tasks in life and took many jobs out of > the > market!. And they suck. All systems suck. And thanks to that I got my job. Valeri > > Eliezer > > ---- > Eliezer Croitoru > Linux System Administrator > Mobile:

Hello, This afternoon I wanted to upgrade to 7.1 two good old dell PowerEdge servers which were running FreeBSD 6.x. It went fine and quickly on the poweredge 1950, but it failed completely on the poweredge 1850. Facts: - boot cd and setup / operation of freebsd 6.x or 7.0 is fine Message log abstract: $ uname -v FreeBSD 7.0-RELEASE-p7 #0: Sun Dec 21 08:31:52 UTC 2008

On 08/09/2017 10:44 PM, mad.scientist.at.large at tutanota.com wrote: > what file system are you using? ssd drives have different characteristics that need to be accomadated (including a relatively slow write process which is obvious as soon as the buffer is full), and never, never put a swap partition on it, the high activity will wear it out rather quickly. might also check cables, often a