similar to: grow and shrink effect - how to resize?

often when I "try to" visit the scriptaculous, it crashes IE - does anybody else experience this as well? _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/

Handle the swap partition on their own, rebuilding them using the existing UUID and label. --- resize/resize.ml | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- resize/virt-resize.pod | 8 ++++++++ 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/resize/resize.ml b/resize/resize.ml index 7d06f18..59ee5bf 100644 --- a/resize/resize.ml +++ b/resize/resize.ml @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ and

[Continuing a discussion from IRC so we have a permanent record] We want to shrink a disk image using virt-resize. Shrinking is harder and not really documented. It requires some manual calculations too. Here is the original: $ virt-df -a 209e6911-fe48-4321-900f-928b3400df88 Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use%

Hi, When is the Scale effect going to go back to being able to return an item to its original size? I loved that onmouseover, onmouseout combo. This is a terrific lib-- has made rethink javascript top-to-bottom. AR

I was wondering whether it''s possible to pass some arguments to the effect.cancel() - e.g. when canceling fading, I think the opacity should be reset to the default value or 1. Thank you _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org

I know nothing about this pass, but here are a few comments. > Does anyone know if the shrink wrap pass works for ARM architecture? First, how are you invoking it? Looks to be a command line option, so -mllvm -shrink-wrap should enable it. Assuming you have a Debug build, you can see the debug output using -debug-only=shrink-wrap. > I tried it seems not working. Which architecture

The current implementation in LLVM is experimental at best. It probably should be ripped out. Evan On Oct 30, 2013, at 2:10 PM, mcrosier at codeaurora.org wrote: > I know nothing about this pass, but here are a few comments. > >> Does anyone know if the shrink wrap pass works for ARM architecture? > > First, how are you invoking it? > > Looks to be a command line

On Mar 13, 2009, at 10:43 AM, John Mosby wrote: > > I started to reduce the traversals, then decided to work on edge > splitting because I believe it may be needed to finish shrink > wrapping. Hmm. I don't think edge splitting would be required for correctness, right? There is always a common predecessor / successor. For the first pass, we should not be shooting to

Hi John. > I am putting this information > into my temp. wiki page in hopes of getting it into the dev wiki when > that is available. The dev wiki is up at its temporary name http://google2.osuosl.org/wiki/. Feel free to dump your stuff on there. On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 7:43 PM, John Mosby <ojomojo at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Evan, > Thanks very much for the review, I am

On Mar 1, 2009, at 2:57 PM, John Mosby wrote: > First, thanks very much for your comments! > > On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Evan Cheng <evan.cheng at apple.com> > wrote: > > On Feb 26, 2009, at 2:02 PM, John Mosby wrote: > > It is limited to X86 presently since that is the only target I have > > access to at the moment. > > What part of this is

I am new to Wine and really struggling. I'm trying to get DVD Shrink and DVD Decrypter running on my Kubuntu 5.04. My system is current. I have a 2.8Mhz machine with 1Gb memory and lots of space on my 160Gb hard drive. I have a Plextor DVD+-RW and an HP CD-RW. They are /dev/hdc and /dev/hdd respectively. Here is my /fstab file: # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # <file

Hello, I''m having the following code below - when I click on the button in order to toggle a div, it is working when the div is visible - after it is toggled once, the beforeStart stuff isn''t executed anymore! interestingly, when I change this Effect.toggle(this.bContentWrap, ''blind'', { to this: Effect.toggle(this.bContentWrap, ''slide'',

Here is an updated patch for shrink wrapping with: - spills/restores done with stack slot stores/loads - stack adjustment removed - refactoring (but still in need of more) - spill/restore insertion code unified with spill/restore placement code Documentation available here<http://wiki.github.com/jdmdj/llvm-work/shrink-wrapping-work> illustrates shrink wrapping with loops and discusses a

Hi, Shrink-wrapping capabilities, i.e., better placement of prologue and epilogue sequences, landed in r236507 but are not yet enabled by default. Since r236507 AArch64 is shrink-wrapping ready, meaning we can turn the pass on for this target. I’ve done the same for X86 in r 238293. Now, I need your help to test and benchmark how shrink-wrapping perform on those targets. The goal is to decide

Hello Momchil, (CC’ing more people that could correct me if I’m wrong) Thanks for looking into this. More answers below: > On 9 Apr 2018, at 17:57, Momchil Velikov via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > So, I have this testcase: > > void f(int n, int x[]) { > if (n < 0) > return; > > int a[n]; >

Hi Arnaud, Thanks for following up with that and sorry for the breakage. Couple of comments: MachineLoopInfo *MLI; + RegScavenger *RS; Would it make sense to use a unique_ptr here? That should eliminate the need of having explicit deletes. +; RUN: llc -mtriple=aarch64-linux-gnu -o - %s Add -enable-shrink-wrap=true and a second RUN line with -enable-shrink-wrap=false. Then add check lines