similar to: CentOS-docs Digest, Vol 95, Issue 5

On 10/03/2014 12:11 AM, centos-docs-request at centos.org wrote: > Send CentOS-docs mailing list submissions to > centos-docs at centos.org > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-docs > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > centos-docs-request at centos.org > >

posting messages at 3am on a bright white page can give me auras, migraines, & seizures. A pc screen is much brighter than a piece of paper. "http://www.linux-ha.org/wiki/Main_Page looks pretty dead to me. has nothing to do with centos." Yes it does, I am saying I can't evade cents bureaucracy. "you can most definitely be anonymous and use CentOS. That is perfectly

I have just deployed a new CentOS 6.4 image on AWS, and I'm having issues with init.d scripts not starting up. I've verified the following; 1) They work on their own after boot 2) They're set to run at runlevel 3,4, and 5 via chkconfig 3) The system boots up in runlevel 3 (no GUI) 4) There are no lingering PID files around after boot 5) Permissions

Hello, We had been seeing SIP-guessing attacks on our Asterisk server here. While it wasn't that hard to write a once-a-minute cron job to spank the lusers, that runs once a minute and creates little spikes in the usage and I/O graphs, and is slower to respond than I'd really prefer. I felt that it'd be much cooler to get something more comprehensive put together. We don't use

Has anyone checked to make sure that this won't upset sshguard? [1] Offhand, it looks like it will [2][3]. [1] https://www.sshguard.net/ [2] https://bitbucket.org/sshguard/sshguard/src/2ed7e0aee18b7271daab92d5335c14e04bb2cc89/src/parser/attacks.txt?at=master&fileviewer=file-view-default#attacks.txt-9 [3]

Just to add another alternative while we're discussing the subject, I've got a soft spot for CSF as a replacement for fail2ban, and it has a lot of additional features as well. https://www.configserver.com/cp/csf.html P. On 22/05/2020 18.32, Jerry wrote: > On Thu, 21 May 2020 23:22:04 -0700, lists stated: >> I use SSHGuard on well ssh (doh!), but supposedly you can use it

On Thu, 21 May 2020 23:22:04 -0700, lists stated: >I use SSHGuard on well ssh (doh!), but supposedly you can use it for >postfix and dovecot also. I can tell you it is well supported. I am >on Centos 7 using firewalld. SSHGuard works fairly well with Postfix; however, it is virtually useless with Dovecot. It never picks up on "auth fail" and a few others. I have submitted

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Keith Keller <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > On 2016-08-28, TE Dukes <tdukes at palmettoshopper.com> wrote: > >> Right now, I'm just trying to take some load off my >> home server from badbots but I am getting hit on other services as well. > > Another possibility for you to look at is sshguard. It can

Hi, Sorry for the delay in replying. Been having a few mail problems ironically! Gmail smtp server stopped working! On 23/09/2019 4:13 PM, Bernd Petrovitsch via dovecot wrote: > It's not directly a solution within dovecot but "fail2ban" exists. Yes, I have fail2ban, but that bans based on IP address. And most mail password attacks these days are distributed, and although

Hi all, I wonder if there is a script to analyze logfiles for llogwatch and sshguard? Anyone knows? Adrian -- Adri P. van Bloois "Elegance is not a dispensable luxury but a factor that decides between success and failure." Edsger W. Dijkstra

Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Xen4CentOS kernel panic on dom0 reboot On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 10:17 AM, David Vrabel <david.vrabel at citrix.com>wrote: > > On 05/03/14 15:09, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > I've been using Xen4CentOS for the last 3 months. It's working fine and > > > dom0/domUs are stable but the server does a kernel panic when doing a > > >

On Thu, 2019-11-21 at 13:44 +0100, Adrian van Bloois wrote: > I wonder if there is a script to analyze logfiles for llogwatch and > sshguard? > Anyone knows? You can take an existing script, for another piece of software reported by Logwatch, retain the beginning and ending parts, and create your own version. The completed script should be placed in /etc to ensure it is not

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1326 Bug ID: 1326 Summary: `nft list' is very slow when output contains meters that has lots of elements Product: nftables Version: unspecified Hardware: x86_64 OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5

Here is something interesting... I went through the BIOS options and found that one R710 that *is* functioning only differed in that "Logical Processor"/Hyperthreading was *enabled* while the one that is *not* functioning had HT *disabled*. Enabled Logical Processor and the system starts without issue! I've rebooted 3 times now without issue. Dell R710 BIOS version 6.4.0 2x Intel(R)

I use SSHGuard on well ssh (doh!), but supposedly you can use it for postfix and dovecot also. I can tell you it is well supported. I am on Centos 7 using firewalld. ? Original Message ? From: adi at ddns.com.au Sent: May 21, 2020 11:01 PM To: voytek at sbt.net.au Cc: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re: fail2ban setup centos 7 not picking auth fail? On 22-05-2020 15:45, Voytek Eymont

On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 1:21 PM Zeno Davatz <zdavatz at gmail.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 6:59 PM Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > > > > Ben -- probably the ACR changes in 5.6 don't fall back nicely anymore > > when there's no firmware? The load shouldn't be failed, just GR > > disabled... > > > > Zeno -- if

Hello, trying out btrfs on my linux installation. I am running Funtoo with Linux 3.0 kernel. After a reboot kernel panicked (no access to error log since it is my root volume that failed). I get this using a rescue cd (2.6.38, btrfs v 0.19) and then trying to mount : [  752.129118] btrfs bad tree block start 0 131072 [  752.129152] btrfs: failed to read chunk root on sda5 [  752.132190] btrfs:

Ben -- probably the ACR changes in 5.6 don't fall back nicely anymore when there's no firmware? The load shouldn't be failed, just GR disabled... Zeno -- if you grab linux-firmware, it should be all better. Not sure if you're missing it on purpose or by accident. Cheers, -ilia On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:07 AM Zeno Davatz <zdavatz at gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi >

Dave, Take a look at this kernel as it is the one I think we are going to release (or a slightly newer 4.9.2x from kernel.org LTS). This version has some newer settings that are more redhat/fedora/centos base kernel like WRT what is a module and what is built into the kernel, etc. https://people.centos.org/hughesjr/4.9.x/ Thanks, Johnny Hughes On 04/14/2017 05:16 AM, Anderson, Dave wrote: >

PJ, I didn't have virsh installed (libvirt-client).? After having installed it, it still didn't see the process: virsh autostart testvm error: failed to connect to the hypervisor error: no valid connection error: Failed to connect socket to '/var/run/libvirt/libvirt-sock': No such file or directory Then, after having installed libvirt, it gives essentially the same error.