similar to: assessment free information for repository decision making

I'am running into this https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206101 while trying to handcraft a kickstart file for CentOS7. Does anybody knowns a workaround? -- LF

Am 16.04.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > Am 16.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: >> Is there any nice way to get tlsv1.2 support to centos 5? >> upgrading os to 6 is not option available. > > > Unfortunately not. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066914 -- LF

Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> > wrote: > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu >>> : >>> Any new information here? >> >> maybe some cooperation with the fedora

> Am 11.04.2018 um 15:48 schrieb Fabian Arrotin <arrfab at centos.org>: > ... > - or we try to build those and continue to provide ansible +1 -- LF

Johnny, Should we give up hope on this issue? On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: > Am 22.02.2015 um 07:20 schrieb Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>: > > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 6:47 AM, Leon Fauster < > leonfauster at googlemail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb

in fact: modgnutls provides easy way to get tlsv1.2 to rhel 5 -- Eero 2015-04-16 21:02 GMT+03:00 Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > well. this hack solution might work: > http://www.tuxad.de/blog/archives/2014/11/19/openssl_updatesenhancements_for_rhel__centos_5/index.html > > -- > Eero > > 2015-04-16 17:30 GMT+03:00 Leon Fauster <leonfauster at

Am 16.06.2018 um 12:25 schrieb Johnny Hughes via CentOS <centos at centos.org>: > We have now set the mailing list to rewrite headers. That also has set > the From: of the email to the Mailing list and not the Original Author. > The author is moved to the CC: block and you can still easily see who > sent it and my email client (thunderbird) still does things the same way >

Am 25.08.2015 um 16:31 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > 25.8.2015 4.03 ip. "Leon Fauster" <leonfauster at googlemail.com> kirjoitti: > >> >> In the hope that some skilled developers are here: >> >> We have a commercial product that do not run under CentOS6 >> >> /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not

Am 15.09.2015 um 19:09 schrieb Keith Keller <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>: > On 2015-09-15, Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com> wrote: >>> On 2015-09-15, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: >> >> this also helps to boot >> >> http://www.rodsbooks.com/refind/ > > rEFInd will work on EFI-based Macs, but not on old PPC

Am 06.08.2015 um 22:21 schrieb Chris Murphy <lists at colorremedies.com>: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Bowie Bailey <Bowie_Bailey at buc.com> wrote: > >> Doing a new install on the two 1TB drives is my current plan. If that >> works, I can connect the old drive, copy over all the data, and then try to >> figure out what I need to do to get all the

> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > >> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >> >> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >> >> Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake >> >> has the current EL6

https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about Intel Core i7-6700 Quad-Core Skylake has the current EL6 variant support for it? Any experience? Feedback would be greatly appreciated. Thanks, LF

In the hope that some skilled developers are here: We have a commercial product that do not run under CentOS6 /lib64/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found Is it possible to compile software (compile switch?) on a system that uses a newer glibc but in such a way that can be used (executed) on a system with an older glibc (like here: compiled on glibc 2.14 based system but C6 is on

I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. Thanks for the effort! LF

Am 20.02.2015 um 13:53 schrieb "Phelps, Matthew" <mphelps at cfa.harvard.edu>: > Any new information here? maybe some cooperation with the fedora community would help to share the effort. Tom Callaway (aka spot) is the maintainer of fedoras repo http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/spot/chromium/ https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/spot/chromium/ thought ... --

How about using gnutls? Eero 16.4.2015 12.46 ip. "Leon Fauster" <leonfauster at googlemail.com> kirjoitti: > Am 16.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > > Is there any nice way to get tlsv1.2 support to centos 5? > > upgrading os to 6 is not option available. > > > Unfortunately not. > > -- > LF > > >

well. this hack solution might work: http://www.tuxad.de/blog/archives/2014/11/19/openssl_updatesenhancements_for_rhel__centos_5/index.html -- Eero 2015-04-16 17:30 GMT+03:00 Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > Am 16.04.2015 um 11:46 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > > Am 16.04.2015 um 11:43 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at

yep, but still lack critical features :) like livebackup. 2015-06-17 12:26 GMT+03:00 Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: > Am 17.06.2015 um 11:17 schrieb Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi>: > > It's so sad that centos is using very old versio on kvm > > and due that fact live backup without downtime is not possible. > > > just some

Am 15.09.2015 um 17:12 schrieb Keith Keller <kkeller at wombat.san-francisco.ca.us>: > On 2015-09-15, wwp <subscript at free.fr> wrote: >> >> Searching the web, I see very few possibilities to install a recent (I >> need gnome2) GNU/Linux distro on such hardware. I gave Linux MintPPC 11 >> (http://www.mintppc.org/content/list-macs) a try, but the netinstall

On 05/11/2017 12:45 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 11.05.2017 um 16:29 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >> >>> Am 11.05.2017 um 14:48 schrieb Leon Fauster <leonfauster at googlemail.com>: >>> >>> https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/intel >>> >>> shows mainly Xeon CPUs. What about >>> >>>