similar to: 3TB non-system disk reports wrong size on Centos 6 x86_64

My apologies in advance for asking such an elementary question. I called myself searching the Installation Guide and Deployment Guide, with no success. The situation is that I bought a Lite-On ATAPI iHAP122 that will not burn DVDs unless I use hdparm to turn dma off. I bought that drive because it was a rare beige drive. Until I can find a decent DVD burner and/or get a Windows machine put

Okay, I've been chasing performance for a while now. I have no idea if I should be trying to get better performance or if I'm getting all I can out of my hardware. Here is the information: /sbin/hdparm -I /dev/hdd /dev/hdd: ATA device, with non-removable media Model Number: ST328040A Serial Number: 7BY034XB Firmware Revision: 3.07 Standards:

Am 10.02.2020 um 12:43 hat Richard W.M. Jones geschrieben: > On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 01:25:28AM +0200, Mykola Ivanets wrote: > > From: Nikolay Ivanets <stenavin@gmail.com> > > > > I faced with situation where libguestfs cannot recognize partitions on a > > disk image which was partitioned on a system with "4K native" sector > > size support. >

пн, 10 лют. 2020 о 10:53 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> пише: > > On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 01:25:28AM +0200, Mykola Ivanets wrote: > > From: Nikolay Ivanets <stenavin@gmail.com> > > > > I faced with situation where libguestfs cannot recognize partitions on a > > disk image which was partitioned on a system with "4K native" sector > >

пн, 10 лют. 2020 о 13:43 Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> пише: > > On Sat, Feb 08, 2020 at 01:25:28AM +0200, Mykola Ivanets wrote: > > From: Nikolay Ivanets <stenavin@gmail.com> > > > > I faced with situation where libguestfs cannot recognize partitions on a > > disk image which was partitioned on a system with "4K native" sector > >

From: Nikolay Ivanets <stenavin@gmail.com> I faced with situation where libguestfs cannot recognize partitions on a disk image which was partitioned on a system with "4K native" sector size support. In order to fix the issue we need to allow users to specify desired physical and/or logical block size per drive basis. It is definitely not a complete patch but rather a way to

Well this is a new one.... Illumos/Openindiana let me add a device as a hot spare that evidently has a different sector alignment than all of the other drives in the array. So now I''m at the point that I /need/ a hot spare and it doesn''t look like I have it. And, worse, the other spares I have are all the same model as said hot spare. Is there anything I can do with this or

We run several RH7.2/7.3 servers & recently 2 of them, although still working fine, have started to show kjournald as generally using over 50% cpu% on 'top' - virtually continuously. Free cpu% generally less than 25% now! Both machines are also using software RAID5 EIDE ....... otherwise are standard server installs. Any info on what kjournald is & why it should have recently

I upgraded my Centos 4.7 server last night. Switched from a cheaper 50$ asus motherboard to a Supermicro motherboard. I also, using dd, copied entire 500g SATA seagate drive to new 500g SATA seagate drive so as to have two copies in case something went wrong. Anyway, now I keep getting this error: Nov 21 06:08:33 server kernel: hda: status timeout: status=0xd0 { Busy } Nov 21 06:08:33 server

Hello Folks, We have 2 (identical hardware) busy public 2U rack servers, both have several hundred users & peak email (for example) deliveries at 300/5min during the daytime. Both servers run RAID1 over 2 EIDE disk drives. One server is fine - it never has problems - it is running RH7.3 and CPU loads are normal. The other server has constant disk activity & kjournald at CPU load of

When --blocksize <val> is provided, qemu command line would add physical_block_size=<val>,physical_logical_size=<val> to -device directive. Example: qemu-kvm \ -drive file=raw.img,cache=writeback,id=hd0,if=none \ -device scsi-hd,drive=hd0,physical_block_size=4096,logical_block_size=4096 \ Signed-off-by: Tuan Hoang <tmhoang@linux.ibm.com> --- fish/fish.c |

> +/** > + * blk_check_logical_block_size - check if logical block size is supported > + * by the kernel > + * @size: the logical block size, in bytes > + * > + * Description: > + * This function checks if the block layers supports given block size > + **/ > +bool blk_is_valid_logical_block_size(unsigned int size) > +{ > + return size >= SECTOR_SIZE

Can my jpyeron user be blessed to update the WIKI, so a CentOS 6 and CentOS 7 VPAT can be posted? Recommending under FAQ or AdditionalResources -Jason > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Pyeron [mailto:jpyeron at pdinc.us] > Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 14:08 > To: 'centos-devel at centos.org' > Subject: VPAT for centos 7 - section 508 compliance statement >

Did you work this via the CentOS Board to make sure its ok to post ? Regards On 22/09/16 19:44, Jason Pyeron wrote: > I was able to rename my (very old) user to JasonPyeron . > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: centos-docs-bounces at centos.org >> [mailto:centos-docs-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Jason Pyeron >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 14:39

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:42 > > Gotcha, I also work with DoD for Navy systems and was surprised by > that. So you mean if we don't want to pay RHEL licensing fees, we can > use Centos? Since we are paying about $100 per RHEL license. But you will still need a (self?) support plan to be STIG compliant. >

> -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Ricles > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2014 11:23 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Firefox fails to authenticate .mil > sites with New DoDCAC > > I thought DoD used RHEL and not Centos, or did Centos did approved > DADEMS recently? DADMS is a Navy system, but yes Centos is approved for use by DISA. You would

We have internal DNS servers that will override the A record for selected hosts. Example mail.pdinc.us will have a different internal ip than external. This has always been a fine way to handle it as the zone files are for that specific host, and there have never been subdomains before. Now we want to just override the MX records for pdinc.us without having to merge or manage all the records for

Hi Gang, I recently rented a server at a datacenter with Centos 5.7 X64, Q9550 Processor, 8GB Ram, and dual 250GB SATA HDs (with 16mb cache). They had loaded it with KVM, and installed a 30-day trial of Virtualizor as the front-end for KVM. I was so impressed with how fasts the guests ran that I want to build a few of these machines for myself. I just installed one: same Q9550 processor, 4GB

> -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Murphy > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 3:58 > > I think the panic is the consequence of drive write failure. > So the actual > problem is before the panic call trace. Most of the time it panics without any warning, but once there was: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason Pyeron > > Sent: Sunday,

In the bang head and repeat mode here. The live usb partition is /dev/sda1 Reboot / power on It auto mounts the /dev/sda2 as ext4 on /mnt/disc/sda2 $ umount /mnt/disc/sda2 $ mkdir /root/foo $ mke2fs /dev/sda2 $ mount /dev/sda2 /root/foo Kernel panic Snip from the kernel panic: ?????? list_del+0xb/0x71 cache_alloc_refill+0xf1/0x186 ext2_fill_super+0x0/0xa37 .... system_call+0x7e/0x83 --