similar to: Will Devtools-1.1 or later become part of SCL?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 7000 matches similar to: "Will Devtools-1.1 or later become part of SCL?"

2014 Sep 14
1
default devtools enabled for users
Hi! I want to make the default environment for users the environment of devtoolset .. and i am thinking to do it this way: 1. make /bin/bash-devtools with the content scl enable devtoolset-2 bash "$@" 2. change for the prospective users the shell from /bin/bash to /bin/bash-devtoolset Is this the best way? Do anyone see or know of any pitfalls with this? Thanks a lot! Adrian
2013 Feb 26
2
[LLVMdev] make error building llvm/clang 3.2 on Linux
Just in case someone is having similar problems and/or following this thread, here's my final "solution" (at least, for now). In my bash build script, prior to configure, I set the C_INCLUDE_PATH and CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH to empty strings, and then set some other environment variables instead: export C_INCLUDE_PATH= export CPLUS_INCLUDE_PATH=
2016 Nov 18
3
SCL devtoolset-3 or 4 without eclipse?
Is there a way to install devtoolset packages without the bloat of eclipse? I just want the new compiler and toolchain, not a big IDE. BTW devtoolset-3 dependencies are broken in yum with C6 yum install devtoolset-3 ... ---> Package devtoolset-3-perftools.x86_64 0:3.1-12.el6 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: devtoolset-3-dyninst for package:
2019 Sep 27
1
passing extra arguments to devtools::build
This question was posed on SO : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/58118495/passing-extra-argumenets-to-devtoolsbuild but there has been no useful reply. Something seems to have changed in the |devtools|package, so that the following commands, that used to run now give an error I can't decipher: |>Sys.setenv(R_GSCMD="C:/Program
2013 Feb 21
4
[LLVMdev] make error building llvm/clang 3.2 on Linux
I'm attempting to build a native build of clang from the 3.2 source distribution tarballs, but I ran into this build error that's got me really puzzled. My platform is Linux - 32-bit Ubuntu (12.04) running on a PC. Here's the (abbreviated) output from make: *************************************** ... make[3]: Entering directory
2013 Dec 20
3
error con install_github() del paquete devtools
Hola a todos. Estoy intentando instalar el paquete likert utilizando devtools y obtengo el siguiente error library(devtools) install_github('likert','jbryer') Installing github repo(s) likert/master from jbryer Downloading likert.zip from https://github.com/jbryer/likert/archive/master.zip Error en function (type, msg, asError = TRUE) : <not set> Me pasa también con
2014 Aug 19
3
Is using devtools::release no longer allowed?
I recently tried to submit a package to CRAN using the release function in the devtools package and got the response: > The policies asked you to use the webform: do so in future. I think that the relevant line in the policies are: > When submitting a package to CRAN you should use the submission form at > http://CRAN.R-project.org/submit.html (and not send an email). You will be sent
2012 Nov 14
1
devtools - document() weiredness
Hello, Please try this: > library(devtools) > create("mdaa") > setwd("mdaa") > dev_mode() d> install() Produces ...* DONE (mdaa) Reloading installed mdaa But when I then try to build documentation d> document() devtools/roxygen just hangs with a "?" like so: Updating mdaa documentation Loading mdaa ? I know this scenario is strange as
2013 Dec 20
4
error con install_github() del paquete devtools
Si. Pero no funciona. En ordenador curro si funciona y tb tiene linux. Seguiré investigando has probado con: install_github('paquete",username='usuario')? 2013/12/20 Jose Luis Cañadas Reche <canadasreche@gmail.com>: > Hola a todos. > > Estoy intentando instalar el paquete likert utilizando devtools y obtengo el > siguiente error > > library(devtools) >
2015 Sep 08
3
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
> Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 15:24:50 -0700 > From: Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Richard wrote: >> >> >> > Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 14:57:22 -0700 >> > From: Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> >> > >> > I was able to get h.264 support on
2015 Jan 19
3
Chromium browser for C6
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Johnny, > > > > Any ETA on version 39.0.2171.95 > > > > cheers > > > > > > bump > _______________________________________________ > CentOS mailing list
2017 Jul 12
1
devtools::check "hangs"
Hi, checking my package with check from devtools leads to the output Functions with \usage entries need to have the appropriate \alias entries, and all their arguments documented. The \usage entries must correspond to syntactically valid R code. See chapter ?Writing R documentation files? in the ?Writing R Extensions? manual. * checking Rd contents ... OK * checking for unstated dependencies in
2015 Jan 19
2
Chromium browser for C6
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 1:13 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Johnny,
2015 Jan 20
3
Chromium browser for C6
On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > > > >> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > >> wrote:
2013 Sep 18
3
Chromium update
Latest chromium-el6 at http://people.centos.org/hughesjr/chromium/6/x86_64/RPMS/ is chromium-28.0.1500.95-213514.x86_64.rpm but latest chromium stable is 29.0.1547.xx wondering if there are any problems building version 29?
2015 Jan 21
3
Chromium browser for C6
On Mon, 19 Jan 2015, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/19/2015 06:49 PM, Fred Smith wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 05:55:44PM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/19/2015 04:10 PM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: >>>> On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 01/19/2015 12:23 PM, Phelps,
2012 Jun 20
0
Devtools 0.7
# devtools The aim of `devtools` is to make your life as a package developer easier by providing R functions that simplify many common tasks. Devtools is opinionated about how to do package development, and requires that you use `roxygen2` for documentation and `testthat` for testing. Future version will relax these opinions - patches are welcome! You can track (and contribute to) development of
2012 Jun 20
0
Devtools 0.7
# devtools The aim of `devtools` is to make your life as a package developer easier by providing R functions that simplify many common tasks. Devtools is opinionated about how to do package development, and requires that you use `roxygen2` for documentation and `testthat` for testing. Future version will relax these opinions - patches are welcome! You can track (and contribute to) development of
2012 Mar 02
0
devtools 0.6
# devtools The aim of `devtools` is to make your life as a package developer easier by providing R functions that simplify many common tasks. Devtools is opinionated about how to do package development, and requires that you use `roxygen2` for documentation and `testthat` for testing. Future version will relax these opinions - patches are welcome! You can track (and contribute to) development of
2012 Mar 02
0
devtools 0.6
# devtools The aim of `devtools` is to make your life as a package developer easier by providing R functions that simplify many common tasks. Devtools is opinionated about how to do package development, and requires that you use `roxygen2` for documentation and `testthat` for testing. Future version will relax these opinions - patches are welcome! You can track (and contribute to) development of