similar to: package conflict with libmodplug in rpmforge and in rpmforge and epel

Dear All, there's a security update for libmodplug: This update is needed to fix a security vulnerability with this package. This notification was issued on 2011-05-10 and last updated on 2011-05-09. Update to upstream version 0.8.8.3 (CVE-2011-1574, CVE-2011-1761). I've the following priorities configured: priority = 1 [base] priority = 1 [extras] priority = 1 [updates] priority = 2

Hi folks, I hope this is the right mailing list to ask since on the repoforge website there is no list or contact information. I have a problem with updating the perl-Nagios-Plugin package. I have installed perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.33-1.el6.rf.noarch, and running yum update leads to: > Error: Package: perl-Nagios-Plugin-0.35-1.el6.rf.noarch (rpmforge) > Requires:

When did they change/lose their name? I was trying to go there here at work, and the site was blocked. I put in a ticket, and get a response that I may have been looking for repoforge, and rpmforge is for raw food diets.... mark

Hey, I ran into a yum conflict regarding an repoforge extra package obsoleting a base package. The thing is that I set a lower priority to repoforge extra... Any idea how come I ran into this issue...? The question is more about the yum priorities than repoforge. ... 1743 packages excluded due to repository priority protections ... --> Running transaction check ---> Package

Hello, RepoForge used to be one of the important repositories for CentOS/RHEL. I know that RepoForge is considered to be clinically dead nowadays. On the other hand RepoForge is still physically alive. We would like to harness community opinion on RepoForge status and future. In case that you use or used to use the RepoForge I kindly ask you to fill up this form to help us with the decision.

"yum update" output: ............................... --> Running transaction check --> Processing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 for package: gnumeric ---> Package goffice.i386 0:0.6.6-1.el5.rf set to be updated --> Finished Dependency Resolution 1:gnumeric-1.6.3-15.el5.2.i386 from installed has depsolving problems --> Missing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 is needed by

On 6/5/2015 10:05 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > > ... audacity... > > I just got it from an epel repository, > but it caused problems with yum. what sort of problems? -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

On 9/30/2015 8:15 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 9/30/2015 5:11 PM, Kommander Mighty Aura wrote: >> Hello. I have been trying to add rpmforge as a repository, but yum does >> not seem to be updating the package lists. I tried... > > rpmforge is a dead repo, no longer maintained, I would not use for > anything anymore. rpmforge was renamed to repoforge, although they

On 6/5/2015 10:44 AM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > Shortly after installing, I got a pop-up > notice that security updates wre available. > On doing yum update, I got error messages: > --> Finished Dependency Resolution > Error: Package: vlc-1.1.13-1.el6.rf.x86_64 (@rpmforge) > Requires: libthreadutil.so.2()(64bit) > Removing:

Hi all, I've just migrated my mail system from procmail to managesieve/sieve and I'm having trouble trying to duplicate a could of rules I used to use in my procmail config. One particular rule would be this: :0 Wfh * ^Sender: owner-scientific-linux-devel at LISTSERV.FNAL.GOV | (sed -e '/^Subject:/ s/\[SCIENTIFIC-LINUX-DEVEL\] *//g'| sed ':a;N;$!ba;s/Precedence:

Using the instructions on: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge#head-f0 c3ecee3dbb407e4eed79a56ec0ae92d1398e01 I enter the command: rpm --import http://apt.sw.be/RPM-GPG-KEY.dag.txt and it comes back to the prompt, like it worked, but attempting to confirm the download: rpm -K rpmforge-release-0.5.2-2.el6.rf.*.rpm results in: error:

Hey, folks, a co-worker raves that vlc is the bestestplaysthemostformats media player there is, including being able to resize videos. I see it's only over on repoforge for CentOS, but trying to install it at home (I'm running 5.8, 32-bit), it wants about 30 or more dependencies, and one or two of them, of course, have conflicts. Has anyone installed it in a 5.x environment? If so,

I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do not play well together and that if I use both, epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority. Alas I had it the other way around. rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity. I no longer need audacity, but would like to fix the situation before some other problem crops up. Would fixing the priorities and telling yum to reinstall all the

Hello. I have been trying to add rpmforge as a repository, but yum does not seem to be updating the package lists. I tried $ yum check-updates [...] Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: <mirror> * epel: <mirror> * extras: <mirror> * rpmforge: mirror.ate.info * updates: <mirror> and searched for any package available there, like i3 and mpv. It is still like

Ah ah, the demo effect... just after I said I did not have much issues with repos... ^_^ A collegue installed some packages (for perconna) and since then a server insists on replacing 2 base packages with 2 rfx packages, even when I gave a lower priority to rfx... Installed: perl-IO-Compress-Base-2.020-127.el6.x86_64 Installed: 1:perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.020-127.el6.x86_64 Installed:

On 07/02/2015 03:11 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 7/1/2015 2:35 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >> OK, here ya go -- >> >> Obsoleting Packages >> >> perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >> perl-IO-Compress-Bzip2.i686 2.021-136.el6_6.1 @updates >> perl-IO-Compress.noarch 2.052-1.el6.rfx rpmforge-extras >> perl-Compress-Zlib.i686

Following Fabian's blog post re: RPMForge being rebuilt for EL5, I've a question: Are there any compatibility problems between RPMForge and EPEL? In other words, if I enabled EPEL previously, will I be able to enable RPMForge as well without running into trouble? -- Florin Andrei http://florin.myip.org/

Dear CentOS Gurus I have been using "repoforge.org" primarily to obtain two RPMs, "lshw" and "flash-plugin". I recently realized that "repoforge.org" should not be used, as it has had no updates for a long long time. But, when I search for the RPMs within the repos: base centosplus contrib epel extras updates the lshw program is nowhere to

Michael Hennebry wrote: > I've been informed that rpmforge and epel do > not play well together and that if I use both, > epel should have the higher (lower numbered) priority. > Alas I had it the other way around. > rpmforge messed up my effort to get audacity. > I no longer need audacity, > but would like to fix the situation before some other problem crops up. > >

Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 05:11:12PM -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> This is annoying. I've been trying to get motion working correctly on CentOS 6. First, there was no ffmpeg rpms. Now, I try to install it, and <snip> >> I've run into problems with libfaad being missing before. Here's the real question: how were the ffmpeg and ffmpeg-libs