Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "semi-OT:R and rkhunter"
2015 Aug 07
2
semi-OT: rkhunter, fix "broken links"
Hi, folks,
rkhunter is reporting a broken link on one of our servers. This is
quite reasonable, since it's on a drive whose controller card I have
declared dead the other day. I've been googling, searching in the
manpage, and I've done an rkhunter --propupd, but it still finds the
broken link. Anyone know how to remove the link from the rkhunter d/b?
mark
2015 Aug 07
0
semi-OT: rkhunter, fix "broken links"
On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 09:45 -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> Hi, folks,
>
> rkhunter is reporting a broken link on one of our servers. This is
> quite reasonable, since it's on a drive whose controller card I have
> declared dead the other day. I've been googling, searching in the
> manpage, and I've done an rkhunter --propupd, but it still finds the
>
2010 Feb 26
0
rkhunter doesn't remove temp suspscan files in /dev/shm
Alle,
I know this is off-topic, so I apologize in advance, but we have
installed rkhunter from EPEL (because it has the current version, 1.3.6
vice the 1.3.4 rpmforge version) on our CentOS machine and find that it
does not remove the files in /dev/shm it uses for the SUSPSCAN test,
this triggering a warning for said test. This was a known bug that was
supposed to be have been fixed in V1.3.1.
2006 Feb 18
0
Does your rkhunter do an md5 check?
I rebuilt rkhunter-1.2.8-1.noarch.rpm by using the spec and tgz from
the rkhunter site (www.rootkit.nl). (I rebuilt it using his
instructions.) However rkhunter does not do an md5 check. The box
used to have fedora and each time there were updates it would
complain that the some of the md5's don't match. I contacted the
author using his contact feature on Wednesday but he hasn't
2006 Dec 02
1
How to install rkhunter properly
Hi list,
after a bit of struggling I found out how to cleanly install rkhunter
... maybe this is useful for you:
* Download rkhunter (I downloaded v 1.2.8)
* mv /etc/rpm/platform /root/etc_rpm_platform
* setarch i386 rpmbuild -ta --target=i386 rkhunter-1.2.8.tar.gz
* mv /root/etc_rpm_platform /etc/rpm/platform
* rpm -ivh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/rkhunter-1.2.8-1.noarch.rpm
* wget
2006 Oct 30
2
Problem rkhunter v. 1.2.8 - CENTOS 4
Dear Friends,
I am using CENTOS 4.3 - kernel 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL with rkhunter version
1.2.8, but the rkhunter program show me problem on file /bin/kill.
I compare files /bin/kill with other CENTOS 4 and it has same size.
====================== SHOE LOG ===========================
Rootkit Hunter 1.2.8 is running
Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:56:44 -0200
Determining OS... Ready
Checking binaries
*
2017 Aug 30
1
rkhunter and prelink
in my prior message, that should be in rkhunter.conf
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu>
wrote:
> This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line
>
> HASH_CMD=sha1sum
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
>
>> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting
2014 May 15
0
Fwd: For the CentOS list: rkhunter and NFS
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <m.roth at 5-cent.us>
Date: Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:40 PM
Subject: For the CentOS list: rkhunter and NFS
To: lesmikesell at gmail.com
Hi, Les,
Could you forward this to the CentOS list? That damn nixspam is
blocking my hosting provider's mailhost *again*; it was on and off
yesterday, and today it won't even let me remove it, and
2014 Apr 30
0
rkhunter 1.4.2 (epel) unary operator expected -ne found
Anyone seeing this?
/etc/cron.daily/rkhunter:
/usr/bin/rkhunter: regel 13967: [: eenzijdige operator werd verwacht, -ne gevonden
Translating: line 13967 unary operator expected -ne found
Line 13967 is: if [ `${IPCS_CMD} -u 2>/dev/null | awk -F' ' '/segments allocated/ {print $3}'` -ne 0 ]; then
rkhunter 1.4.2 release 1.el6 from epel on a CentOS 6.5
Thanks
Patrick
2014 Jan 17
1
rkhunter
I updated java-1.7.0-openjdk a few hours ago - it *was* listed as a
critical security update, and I don't want yelling from rkhunter. The man
page tells me I can tell it rkhunter --propupd <package name>... but it
doesn't know the name above as a package. Been googling a bit, and cannot
find a good example of a package (other than the manpage's coreutil).
Anyone got an example,
2017 Aug 30
0
rkhunter and prelink
This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line
HASH_CMD=sha1sum
On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from
> rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ]
> All file hash checks will be skipped because:
> This system uses
2017 Aug 30
0
rkhunter and prelink
On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 11:03 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote:
> > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line
> >
> > HASH_CMD=sha1sum
> >
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> >
> > > Can't remember if I posted this before...
2017 Aug 30
4
rkhunter and prelink
Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from
rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ]
All file hash checks will be skipped because:
This system uses prelinking, but the hash function command does not
look like SHA1 or MD5.
Now, googling, I find people saying to rm /etc/prelink.cache, then run
rkhunter --propupd.
Works. And then,
2011 Mar 08
1
rkhunter alert dovecot using port 1984
Hi all,
Debian Lenny, dovecot 1.0.15
My rkhunter script has picked up dovecot using port 1984 temporarily.
When I run it now however, it is gone.
Warning: Network TCP port 1984 is being used by /usr/lib/dovecot/imap.
Possible rootkit: Fuckit Rootkit
Use the 'lsof -i' or 'netstat -an' command to check this.
Does dovecot use this port for any reason? anyone seen this before?
2017 Aug 30
2
rkhunter and prelink
On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote:
> This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line
>
> HASH_CMD=sha1sum
>
> On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
>
>> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from
>> rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning
2001 May 09
0
Samba on LynxOS
Hello,
I tried to install Samba-2.0.8 and Samba 2.2.0 on our LynxOS System.
uname -a: LynxOS imklynxa 3.0.1 110298-G i386
gcc --version: 2.7-97r1
First problem in both packets: There is no LynxOS Version 3.0.1 in
config.guess. I added 3 lines and tried again. configure ended only with
a WARNING about the Network interface.
Second Problem I had with the make command.
Second Problem at 2.0.8:
2017 Nov 17
0
semi-OT:apcupsd
On 2017-11-17 10:16 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
> I can't seem to find apcupsd for C 6. Just went to epel's website, and not
> visible. Anyone have a clue?
>
> mark
I can't speak to epel, but we have copies of it if that helps you;
https://alteeve.com/files/apcupsd/
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.com/w/
"I am, somehow, less interested in
2017 Nov 17
7
semi-OT:apcupsd
I can't seem to find apcupsd for C 6. Just went to epel's website, and not
visible. Anyone have a clue?
mark
2008 Jun 16
0
Semaphore setup on database???
we are tried setup CENTOS 4.6 with Informix Dynamic server version 10 UC8 on DELL 6800.
The problem we have is while doing bdatabase backup (ontape), we have error happen. I guess the error come from "semaphoe". server semaphore are:
# sysctl -a|grep sem
kernel.sem = 250 32000 128 128
# sysctl -a|grep shm
vm.hugetlb_shm_group = 0
kernel.shmmni = 4096
2007 May 04
0
Semi-OT: useful things to do with XML browsers inphones
Requests
1. Directories linked to their databases
2 weather broadcasts
3 local traffic info.
4 local news headlines
5 sms send / receive
6 alarm on the phone of calendar events - not a call back, simply a beep and notice without pulling out a pda or opening outlook
Couple of other "one of's" too, some very esoteric like evening's TV lineup,
Dave Bour
Desktop Solution