similar to: btrfs in centos 6

On 12.02.2013 08:25, shyam btrfs wrote: > Hi Arne, Jan, > > I am using btrfs directly from Linux 3.8rc5 (commit > 949db153b6466c6f7cad5a427ecea94985927311). I am trying to use qgroups > functionality & with a basic random-write workload, it constantly > keeps leaking memory & within few minutes of IO, there is either > out-of-memory killer trying to kill some tasks or

Hi there, I'm resending this to the list as I didn't get an answer from sfrench.. > I hope I'm right here. I just followed the "Ask the developer" link on > the CIFS homepage... > > I have to mount a little share from a Windows server, which I did with > smbmount in the past. Now the server has been upgraded to Win2003, and > I'm facing the

Hi guys, I was playing on vmware with btrfs on complete disks /dev/sd{b,c,d,e}. Next I decided to use partitions, so I created /dev/sd{b,c,d,e}1 and used those, worked fine! Afterward, I mistakenly re-ran an old command on the full disk ( mount -t btrfs -o subvol=. /dev/sdb /mnt/ ) notice this is sdb not sdb1, and I got this spectacular kernel freeze. Let me know if that''s some bug.

Under xen, either stock xen-2.0.1+linux-2.6.9 or Fedora''s latest (2.6.10-1.1109_FC4), drdb (<http://www.drbd.org/>),as soon as I try to write to one of its devices, causes "Badness" in the kernel and, ultimately, a spontaneous reboot. Under non-xen 2.6.10-1.1109_FC4 and 2.6.9-1.678_FC3, drbd works fine. The error: Jan 25 21:01:23 turing kernel: Badness in blk_plug_device

Hi, I setup two nodes, 192.168.20.20, and 192.168.20.21, The os is Ubuntu1204 with Kernel version 3.0: root at Server21:~# uname -a Linux Server21 3.2.0-23-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10 20:39:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Server20 reboot for the disconnection with iSCSI SAN, so Server20 recovery resource locks for Server21. Server20: Feb 27 09:29:31 Server20 kernel:

Hi, I setup two nodes, 192.168.20.20, and 192.168.20.21, The os is Ubuntu1204 with Kernel version 3.0: root at Server21:~# uname -a Linux Server21 3.2.0-23-generic #36-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 10 20:39:51 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Server20 reboot for the disconnection with iSCSI SAN, so Server20 recovery resource locks for Server21. Server20: Feb 27 09:29:31 Server20 kernel:

Unfortunately this is a prebuilt proxmox server which is running on debian wheezy and I cannot even install the latest version of libguesfs because of this. On Sep 9, 2014, at 10:18 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 09, 2014 at 08:22:37PM +0300, Keresztes Péter-Zoltán wrote: > [...] > > The btrfs driver in your kernel is unable to mount one of the

Oh nice, I can reproduce it here too, although only if I first load the 'logfs' module. It does seem to be a plain bug in the logfs module. Do you mind if I post the 1MB image you sent me into a public kernel bug report? Rich. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- mount -o -t logfs /dev/vda /sysroot/ [ 107.679255] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL

Hello, My computer locked up and I had to press the reset button. Ever since then I can''t mount the btrfs filesystem, here''s the output: [ 37.645583] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 37.645598] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c:1887 btrfs_remove_free_space+0x329/0x350 [btrfs]() [ 37.645600] Modules linked in: btrfs zlib_deflate libcrc32c ext4 jbd2 mbcache crc16

Hello I did the following commands and resulted in a segmentation fault. [root@localhost ~]# mkfs.btrfs /dev/sda6 WARNING! - Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 IS EXPERIMENTAL WARNING! - see http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org before using fs created label (null) on /dev/sda6 nodesize 4096 leafsize 4096 sectorsize 4096 size 46.93GB Btrfs Btrfs v0.19 [root@localhost ~]# mount /dev/sda6 /mnt/btra [root@localhost ~]#

In-Reply-To: <20060803002518.190834642@xensource.com> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:25:13 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > We allow for the fact that the guest kernel may not run in ring 0. > This requires some abstraction in a few places when setting %cs or > checking privilege level (user vs kernel). I made some changes: a. Added some comments about the SEGMENT_IS_*_CODE() macros.

In-Reply-To: <20060803002518.190834642@xensource.com> On Wed, 02 Aug 2006 17:25:13 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > We allow for the fact that the guest kernel may not run in ring 0. > This requires some abstraction in a few places when setting %cs or > checking privilege level (user vs kernel). I made some changes: a. Added some comments about the SEGMENT_IS_*_CODE() macros.

Unfortunately my laptop deadlocks from time to time, and too often it triggers this bug in btrfs which is quite hard to recover from. The bigger problem is that all the user sees (if anything) is seemingly unrelated info, namely, "RIP: btrfs_num_copies+0x42/0x0b" or somesuch http://marc.merlins.org/tmp/btrfs_num_copies.jpg It''s only if you have serial console, or netconsole,

Hi guys, my computer suddenly failed to boot. It seams that it is unable to mount /home which is btrfs. Here are the messages I get during the boot (the relevant part; hopefully): Feb 02 13:59:58 Edge kernel: kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:6185! Feb 02 13:59:58 Edge kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Feb 02 13:59:58 Edge kernel: Modules linked in: joydev coretemp kvm_intel kvm

Hi, Kernel crash when i tried to mount btrfs: -- Machine: HP Proliant DL 380 G4 -- Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy Server root at btrfs:/home/trey# uname -a Linux btrfs 2.6.24-16-server #1 SMP Thu Apr 10 13:15:38 UTC 2008 x86_64 GNU/Linux -- root at btrfs:/home/trey# fdisk -l Disk /dev/cciss/c0d0: 146.8 GB, 146807930880 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 17848 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 *

Hello all, Came across my first real "problem" in all the years I've been using Linux today and I'm stumped for an answer. I've recently built a back-up server on top of Centos 5.3 using a 3Ware 9650SE 4 port SATA card and 4 x 1.5TB drives in a RAID 5 array. I went for the 3Ware card as it has driver support already so any kernel updates won't require me to rebuild the

Hello Developers, it seems that i discovered a bug in btrfs while testing it on a zSeries mainframe :-) ## Test environment: - IBM System z900 Mainframe - Debian SID with 64 Bit Kernel - GIT Sources from git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mason/btrfs-unstable.git - System runs as z/VM guest - 3 Virtual CPUs - 1 GB RAM Storage ## Initial Test Setup - Setup a Debian SID System with

I've got a fully updated Fedora Core 4 server crashing hard every week or two. I use Samba via smbmount and autofs to read & delete log files on 17 XP boxs and 6 NT4SP6 boxes as well as a couple other Windows files servers every 5 minutes. The first indication of a problem I get is smbmount stops working, then the server becomes unresponsive to the point where only a power slam will fix

Hi, when mounting an intentionally corrupted btrfs filesystem i get the following warning and bug message. The image can be found here www.cccmz.de/~snakebyte/btrfs.2.img.bck.bz2 [ 297.406152] device fsid e14cf01de423381a-4bd40b603870018a <6>devid 2147483649 transid 9 /dev/loop0 [ 297.411937] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 297.412207] WARNING: at fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:805

Hi all, I have a bug with OCFS through configfs : to illustrate this, try : while true ; do ls -l /sys/kernel/config/cluster/ocfs2/heartbeat ; done& while true ; do echo 31> /sys/kernel/config/cluster/ocfs2/heartbeat/dead_threshold ; done& So, I have a kernel crash : BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000040 IP: [<ffffffffa01fd214>]