similar to: write barrier support in CentOS 6

Hi, Not sure if I should post in samba-technical or just samba list. Please advise. Back in February I was trying to do a samba-tool classicupgrade but kept getting SIGSEGV: https://lists.samba.org/archive/samba/2017-February/206409.html I didn't progress much after that. This week I've compiled samba-4.6.5 and installed that. Following the HOW-TO for classic upgrade

Hi, I have two KVM hosts (CentOS 7) and would like them to operate as High Availability servers, automatically migrating guests when one of the hosts goes down. My question is: Is this even possible? All the documentation for HA that I've found appears to not do this. Am I missing something? My configuration so fare includes: * SAN Storage Volumes for raw device mappings for guest vms

Hi, I'm having trouble with the classic upgrade. We have three samba servers: Server1: CentOS 5/Samba 3.6 (with smbldap-tools) Server2: CentOS 6/Samba Version 4.2.14-SerNet-RedHat-23.el6 Server3: CentOS 7/Samba Version 4.2.14-SerNet-RedHat-23.el7 Server 1: CentOS 5/Samba 3.6 (with smbldap-tools) Serves our OpenLDAP backend for centralised authentication (LDAP replicated to two other servers

How about trying commercial RHEV? Eero 22.6.2016 8.02 ap. "Tom Robinson" <tom.robinson at motec.com.au> kirjoitti: > Hi, > > I have two KVM hosts (CentOS 7) and would like them to operate as High > Availability servers, > automatically migrating guests when one of the hosts goes down. > > My question is: Is this even possible? All the documentation for HA

CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) amanda-3.3.3-13.el7.x86_64 amanda-client-3.3.3-13.el7.x86_64 amanda-libs-3.3.3-13.el7.x86_64 dump-0.4-0.22.b44.el7.x86_64 Hi, I have been using amanda backup for quite a long time now. I'm busy migrating some older hosts to CentOS 7 but have found that the available amanda packages (see above) have not been compiled on a host that has the 'dump'

CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) Hi, Last night our CentOS 7 server rebooted. Seemingly it's a very clean reboot. I can't find a shred of evidence as to why it happened though. Things I've checked: * sa reports * /var/log/{messages,secure,dmesg,cron} * /var/log/audit/audit.log * lastlog The host is used for KVM virtualisation and connects via multipathing to our OmniOS SAN via

Hi, I've done a classic upgrade to from samba 3.6.23 to samba 4.6.5 bringing across all the user accounts. The samba 3.6.23 we set up with smbldap as an NT Domain with OpenLDAP. After a lot of effort the classic upgrade worked well but now I'm a bit stuck with idmapping. The new AD DC is running 4.6.5 on CentOS7 and I can connect using ADUC. I set up a separate AD DM on a another CentOS7

Hi All, I'm migrating a CentOS 6 bind instance (chrooted) to a CentOS 7 box and am curious of people's opinions on chrooting vs selinux as a way of securing bind. The bind-chroot on CentOS 7 also comes with a script (/usr/libexec/setup-named-chroot.sh) that sets up the much maligned systemd and, through bind mounts, creates and extra level of chroot hierarchy giving:

# cat /etc/redhat-release CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) # uname -r 3.10.0-123.20.1.el7.x86_64 Hi, We use iSCSI over a 10G Ethernet Adapter and SRP over an Infiniband adapter to provide multipathing to our storage: # lspci | grep 10-Gigabit 81:00.0 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ Network Connection (rev 01) 81:00.1 Ethernet controller: Intel Corporation

Hi, WARNING: Long post ahead I have an issue when starting multipathd. The kernel complains about "blk_cloned_rq_check_limits: over max segments limit". The server in question is configured for KVM hosting. It boots via iBFT to an iSCSI volume. Target is COMSTAR and underlying that is a ZFS volume (100GB). The server also has two infiniband cards providing four (4) more paths over SRP

On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 10:53 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 07/02/17 21:45, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > > On 07/02/17 17:01, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > > > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > \ > > > > Next rid = 13001 > > > > krb5_init_context failed (Invalid

I had to move a perl script from an old server to a new one. Both the old and new servers are running "CentOS release 5.10 (Final)" and perl v5.8.8. (But the problem I'm running into appears to be a package management problem and not a Perl problem which is why I'm posting it to a CentOS list.) The line of code in the script that attempts to open a Net::SFTP connection,

The most recent message is: [3108269.919256] sd 2:0:1:0: timing out command, waited 1080s [3108269.919528] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Unhandled error code [3108269.919535] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] Result: hostbyte=DID_OK driverbyte=DRIVER_OK [3108269.919540] sd 2:0:1:0: [sdb] CDB: Read(10): 28 00 00 01 21 47 00 00 08 00 [3108269.919586] EXT4-fs error (device sdb1): ext4_find_entry: reading directory #2 offset 0

On 10/07/17 17:05, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: > On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 14:17:42 +1000 > Tom Robinson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've done a classic upgrade to from samba 3.6.23 to samba 4.6.5 >> bringing across all the user accounts. The samba 3.6.23 we set up >> with smbldap as an NT Domain with OpenLDAP. After a

This is a bit off topic, however it's related to a samba based network... I've got a small network (10 users) running samba on a Linux box with a HP network printer. This is working so well, that the only network problems that I have are with printers other printers "shared" by Win 95. Therefore: I was planning to turn an old 486 with an 80M HDD into a print server, however the

On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > Anyone? Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 862 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL:

On 07/02/17 17:01, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: > On Tue, 2017-02-07 at 15:58 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >> Hi, >> \ >> Next rid = 13001 >> krb5_init_context failed (Invalid argument) >> smb_krb5_context_init_basic failed (Invalid argument) >> # >> >> Is this a CentOS 6/7 difference issue or is the classicupgrade broken >> for

On 27/02/17 08:05, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 17/02/17 07:58, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Fri, 2017-02-17 at 07:48 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> Anyone? >> Can you please post a gdb backtrace --full? >> >> > Hi, > > I replied last week with a full backtrace but I didn't see my post come through. The email was only >

Rhelpers: Having a problem solving this. I have an xyplot call that looks like this: print(xyplot(temp_species_EAM_Pred_Pop$x+temp_species_NULL_Pred_Pop$x~temp_species_EAM_Pred_Pop$Action,main=current_species, xlab="Action",ylab="Predicted Pop", xlim=c(xmin,xmax),ylim=c(ymin,ymax),

On 15/02/17 14:40, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: > On 13/02/17 10:18, Andrew Bartlett via samba wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-02-13 at 10:00 +1100, Tom Robinson via samba wrote: >>> On 12/02/17 03:13, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >>>> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017 12:34:23 +1100 >>>> Tom Robinson via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: >>>>