similar to: CentOS 5 + Quagga + SELinux

Hello, does anybody know if quagga for CentOS 5.3 is compiled with -enable-multipath? I want to implement ECMP over 2 ISP. Thanks, Cristi Carstea

Hi, > Can you manually do on the xen interfaces what the scripts would? How about > doing it on some other interface configured in a similar way? Toying with the vif-route script, I might have found a workaround for this issue. If I disable the ifconfig and ip route commands from vif-route script, and bring up vif interface by hand later on, everything seems to work. In other works,

Package: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae Version: 3.0.3-0-2 Severity: normal If quagga is running, and I start & stop a domain, the VIF interface doesn't go down properly (in addition to other problems). Here's what I do: 1. Boot the computer. By default, quagga is running (zebra + ospfd). 2. xm create test7.cfg, wait until the domU starts. 3. xm shutdown test7, wait until the domU

Hi, I''ve setup quagga on a shorewall firewall server. The only purpose for this is to use BGP to connect to a "peering platform" supplied by our data centre supplier. There are some very large ISP''s (and other various providers including google) on this peering platform and connecting to it will speed up access to/from our services and hosted servers. The physical

Hey, I have a very trivial parsedfile based type - http://pastie.org/311146 - that works fine when deployed and run under puppetd -t. However, when being run by the daemonized puppet, it results in this error: Mon Nov 10 03:50:48 +0000 2008 //Node[ams-proxy-2]/quagga/Quagga::Daemon[zebra]/Quagga_service[zebra] (err): Failed to retrieve current state of resource: No ability to determine if

Hi folks, At work, we're considering the idea to replace the presente router with a stardard box with CentOS as a SO and GNU Zebra as a routing software. The line is a 4Mbps SDSL. ?What do you think about Zebra and what are your experiencies with it? Any feedback will be so appreciated. TIA.

I'm looking for an open source router solution, and someone from the list recently recommended zebra (www.zebra.org). I haven't yet identified all my needs, but I'm guessing that it will do all my routing needs for a, say, class C set of IP addresses, particularly if I ever have to do anything BGP-related. Anyone have any pointers before I delve in? Or possibly a recommendation for

I''m getting an error when shorewall is trying to add the default routes for my multi-isp configuration. I''ve attached a shorewall dump... If anyone can give some input I''d appreciate it. RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument ERROR: Command "ip -4 route replace default scope global table 254 nexthop via 67.110.119.245 dev eth3 weight 1 nexthop via 66.29.181.113

Hello! I have trouble with multipath routing. Those options are enabled in kernel: [*] IP: policy routing [*] IP: equal cost multipath [*] IP: equal cost multipath with caching support (EXPERIMENTAL) <*> MULTIPATH: round robin algorithm But issuing: ip r a 1.2.3.0/23 scope global equalize nexthop via 80.245.176.11 \ dev eth0 weight 1 nexthop via 80.245.176.13 dev eth0

Hi Guys, I would just like to have advice and pointers of the best way would be, Someting like BGP or OSPF? I have 2 internet connections at diffrent locations. let say connection A and B 1.) router A has a fast internet connection and a seperate interface for clients using /lan/pppoe/ipsec etc and another ethernet interface going to router B 2.) router B has similiar setup as router A and

There has been numerous threads etc regarding this but all that has left me is more than a little confused :-(. I have setup and environment consisting of two OpenVPN tunnels and wish to load balance at the packet level between them. I am currently running on Linux edm 2.4.21-20.EL.c0custom #2 Tue Oct 12 08:52:23 BST 2004 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux And have install Quagga at each end to provide

I have some problem with traffic shaping on debian testing. I actually posted a full config on the list a while ago but didn''t get any answers. The problem is that traffic doesn''t get into the user classes (~150) when I associate a class with a qdisc. I tried sfq, fifo but none works. If I dont''t associate a qdisc with a class classification occurs well.

Hi, I want to run zebra on CentOS 4.5 box acting as a firewall and router. I 'd rather like to user RPM. So I am lokking for a proper RPM. I now googled. But I could not find any for EL4 for CentOS 4. YOUR IDEAS? -- Thank you Indunil Jayasooriya -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hello, Here is my network: ------------------ ------------- ----------- Linux box ----------- GRE --------- Cisco ---------- ------------------ ------------- What I wan to accomplish. I want ripv2 to go across (both ways) through the GRE tunnel. No packets are being passed thought the GRE

First of all, My apologies for this maybe slight OT post, but I have so much confidence and read so much good replies on this list, that I am still asking my question. I''m looking for a linux distribution to use on our school''s homemade routers. The routers are small miniITX based systems with 2 network interfaces. I added a 4 port D-Link network card in some cases, when I

I am trying to set up my Shorewall box to forward multicast packets to my local net. I do have some problems with mrouted (see below), but I can join and add routes using smcroute. Multicast works when shorewall is disabled. I got a lot of help from the following. http://lists.shorewall.net/pipermail/shorewall-users/2005-January/016674.html I cannot get the multicast packets to pass the fw when

I was wondering if anyone is running Quagga on Xen? What is throughput/latency like? Was looking for about a gig of mixed packet size BGP throughput. Hardware is Opteron 4 Way Quad cores, was thinking paravirt with a couple of dedicated cores and maybe the addition of Solarflare 10GB Direct IO NICs might give the required performance level but I am unsure. The other option is multi-queue Intel

Hi, I''ve a local LAN consisting of about 150 machines. I''m using a Linux machine as the gateway machine which inturn connects to two different ISPs. My question is can a Linux based machine match the performance of a hardware based routers provided by Cisco,... OR is my decision to go for a Linux based solution is a wrong one?. Is there so much difference between these

My setup: LAN A | |-- Wireless-r1 --| |-- Wireless-r2 --| ..................| .................LAN B LAN A is my primary (external) LAN. LAN B is my wireless LAN. LAN A does iBGP and OSPF routing. Each wireless router does the following: 2 Bridged Ethernet + STP connections to LAN A 2 Bridged Ethernet + STP connections to LAN B 2 VLANs on LAN A 5 VLANs on LAN B UCARP on each wireless

Hi Everyone, I have a routing situation where Tinc looks like it could come in extremely useful, but I have a query I hope someone can cast an eye on, as I'm unsure whether Tinc can help me here. I currently have a Quagga OSPF linux router which connects LAN A to LAN B over the quickest available of two routes (both routes at both ends connect to Quagga boxes to prevent collisions). One of