similar to: Centos 5.10, Firefox ESR 24.3.0, Rendering Failure

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Centos 5.10, Firefox ESR 24.3.0, Rendering Failure"

2014 Feb 13
1
Centos 5.10 Firefox 24.3.0 HTML OL
Firefox used to render <ol type="a"> <li>.................</li> as a. ............... Now it does not. The HTML 4.1 spec at http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/lists.html#type-values says use CSS instead. These <ol type="a"> <ol type="A"> <ol type="i"> used to work in the Centos 5 supplied Firefox. Now OL
2019 Jun 26
5
Alternitives to Firefox...
At Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:39:12 -0400 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote: > > Robert Heller wrote: > > OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS > > 6. > > And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become > > hard [for me] to use). > > > > > > What alternitives are there?
2016 Apr 29
0
C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare - bunny trail
On 04/29/2016 10:21 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 29 April 2016 at 09:55, isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Always Learning writes: >>> However the time-wasting problem remains, so too do the down-loaded >>> extensions in /tmp, example tmp-xxx.xpi >> The reason behind this is the missing patch referenced by Johnny's posting >> that you
2006 May 05
2
Including a single function from a package
Hello all. I'm building a package where I want to include a function from two different packages. In particular, I want to include mvrnorm and hyperg_2F1 from MASS and gsl, respectively (but the specific functions do not matter). With what I've tried after reading the "Specifying imports and exports" section from the "Writing R Extensions" manual, I get an error:
2016 Apr 29
2
C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare
> Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016 22:27:16 -0400 > From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: >> >> Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR >> 45.1.0 > > Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see >
2019 May 09
0
Firefox esr repackage
The price we pay.. :) BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround in fact until RH catches up): https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/ -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "CentOS
2019 May 08
0
Firefox esr repackage
I was told lately about this workaround, check it out. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/ -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent:
2019 May 08
1
Firefox esr repackage
cool!! that works for now.. thanks Mark!! On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:21 AM mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: > > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
2015 Sep 11
0
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
> -----Original Message----- > From: John Hodrien [mailto:J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk] > Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 6:39 AM > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > > > does anyone running C6 have h.264 check box on www.youtube.com/html5 ? > > > > if
2016 Apr 29
0
C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: > Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0 Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html), and CentOS rebuilt and released it. What, exactly, would you like the CentOS maintainers to do differently? Are you volunteering your time to help?
2018 Jul 05
0
Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
Mr. Hughes, Thank very much for the update! That's the kind of info I was looking for, if an ETA isn't reasonable to ask for. I can report a summary of your note to my upstream authorities. I support both SL7 and C7 workstations, but had not yet seen the update on the sl-devel list. I appreciate you taking the time to answer this thread! Thanks for your hard work! From: Johnny
2019 May 08
0
Firefox esr repackage
firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote: > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin. > > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates > repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released > firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue. (see >
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
Hi Nux, The number will be higher than that. Some large systems just download once to their own private mirror and install from there. Where I used to work each download went to at least 6 systems, probably more. Regards, Martin On 10/05/2019 10:12, Nux! wrote: > I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user
2016 Apr 29
0
C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare
On 04/28/2016 10:20 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote: >>> Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0 >> >> Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see >>
2013 Nov 04
0
Firefox ESR and Coldfusion
CentOS-6.4 x86_64 Firefox-17.0.10ESR I am getting a missing plugin report from Firefox when trying to load this url: http://yyyy.xxx.net//sco_launchv5.1.cfm?regKey=22349&CFID=0&CFTOKEN=1ED09F3E-5335-471C-BF35C63C0CAC4019 A Firefox search for plugins reports none found. I believe that this URL refers to a Coldfusion script. Given the context I am working in I believe that this script
2015 Sep 08
2
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
I was able to get h.264 support on www.youtube.com/html5 on fedora 21 by installing gstreamer1-libav but that package does not exist in C6 (or it's popular third party repos) What is the name of the package which adds h.264 to firefox on youtube/html5 in C6?
2015 Sep 08
0
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 14:57:22 -0700 > From: Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > > I was able to get h.264 support on www.youtube.com/html5 on fedora > 21 by installing > > gstreamer1-libav > > but that package does not exist in C6 (or it's popular third party > repos) > > What is the
2015 Sep 11
0
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> wrote: > > > > Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 15:24:50 -0700 > > From: Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com> > > > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Richard wrote: > >> > >> > >> > Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 14:57:22 -0700 >
2015 Sep 12
0
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:18 AM, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote: > > If anyone has clues on how to build and add just a portion of >> gst-plugins-bad into the existing EL OS set of gstreamer plugins, please >> share (even URL pointers). >> >> [1] >>
2015 Sep 12
0
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg < Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.fr> wrote: > On 09/11/2015 08:11 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Richard < >> lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> >> wrote: >> > <snip> > >> >> >> does anyone running C6 have h.264 check box on