Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "Centos 5.10, Firefox ESR 24.3.0, Rendering Failure"
2014 Feb 13
1
Centos 5.10 Firefox 24.3.0 HTML OL
Firefox used to render
<ol type="a">
<li>.................</li>
as
a. ...............
Now it does not. The HTML 4.1 spec at
http://www.w3.org/TR/html401/struct/lists.html#type-values
says use CSS instead.
These
<ol type="a">
<ol type="A">
<ol type="i">
used to work in the Centos 5 supplied Firefox. Now OL
2019 Jun 26
5
Alternitives to Firefox...
At Wed, 26 Jun 2019 16:39:12 -0400 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote:
>
> Robert Heller wrote:
> > OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS
> > 6.
> > And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become
> > hard [for me] to use).
> >
> >
> > What alternitives are there?
2016 Apr 29
0
C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare - bunny trail
On 04/29/2016 10:21 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 29 April 2016 at 09:55, isdtor <isdtor at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Always Learning writes:
>>> However the time-wasting problem remains, so too do the down-loaded
>>> extensions in /tmp, example tmp-xxx.xpi
>> The reason behind this is the missing patch referenced by Johnny's posting
>> that you
2006 May 05
2
Including a single function from a package
Hello all.
I'm building a package where I want to include a function from two
different packages. In particular, I want to include mvrnorm and
hyperg_2F1 from MASS and gsl, respectively (but the specific functions
do not matter). With what I've tried after reading the "Specifying
imports and exports" section from the "Writing R Extensions" manual, I
get an error:
2016 Apr 29
2
C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare
> Date: Thursday, April 28, 2016 22:27:16 -0400
> From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
>
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>>
>> Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR
>> 45.1.0
>
> Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see
>
2019 May 09
0
Firefox esr repackage
The price we pay.. :)
BTW, Mozilla publishes tarballs that you can simply extract and run (and will self-update), you can use those (it's what I am doing as a workaround in fact until RH catches up):
https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/60.6.3esr/linux-x86_64/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "CentOS
2019 May 08
0
Firefox esr repackage
I was told lately about this workaround, check it out.
https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2019/05/04/update-regarding-add-ons-in-firefox/
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
----- Original Message -----
> From: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
> Sent:
2019 May 08
1
Firefox esr repackage
cool!! that works for now.. thanks Mark!!
On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 11:21 AM mark <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote:
> > Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well
> > know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
> >
> > From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
2015 Sep 11
0
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Hodrien [mailto:J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk]
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 6:39 AM
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
>
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
> > does anyone running C6 have h.264 check box on www.youtube.com/html5 ?
> >
> > if
2016 Apr 29
0
C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
> Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0
Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-0695.html), and CentOS
rebuilt and released it.
What, exactly, would you like the CentOS maintainers to do
differently? Are you volunteering your time to help?
2018 Jul 05
0
Firefox 60.0.1.0 ESR Progress?
Mr. Hughes,
Thank very much for the update! That's the kind of info I was looking
for, if an ETA isn't reasonable to ask for. I can report a summary of
your note to my upstream authorities. I support both SL7 and C7
workstations, but had not yet seen the update on the sl-devel list.
I appreciate you taking the time to answer this thread! Thanks for
your hard work!
From: Johnny
2019 May 08
0
Firefox esr repackage
firefox_repackage via CentOS wrote:
> Hi everyone, I use firefox on centos 7 at work but due to the fairly well
> know extension signing problem, I cannot use ublock origin.
>
> From what I can tell, the latest version of firefox in the updates
> repository is 60.6.1-1.el7. It looks like Mozilla have just released
> firefox esr 60.6.2 which should fix the signing issue. (see
>
2019 May 10
0
Firefox esr repackage
Hi Nux,
The number will be higher than that. Some large systems just download
once to their own private mirror and install from there. Where I used
to work each download went to at least 6 systems, probably more.
Regards,
Martin
On 10/05/2019 10:12, Nux! wrote:
> I maintain a desktop oriented repo for CentOS and last I checked a year or so ago, I got over 150k+ unique IPs with yum user
2016 Apr 29
0
C5: The Firefox ESR 45.1.0 Nighmare
On 04/28/2016 10:20 PM, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2016-04-28 at 22:27 -0400, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 02:23:32AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>>> Centos replaced well-running customise Firefox with version ESR 45.1.0
>>
>> Errr... you mean Red Hat released a security update (see
>>
2013 Nov 04
0
Firefox ESR and Coldfusion
CentOS-6.4
x86_64
Firefox-17.0.10ESR
I am getting a missing plugin report from Firefox when trying to load this url:
http://yyyy.xxx.net//sco_launchv5.1.cfm?regKey=22349&CFID=0&CFTOKEN=1ED09F3E-5335-471C-BF35C63C0CAC4019
A Firefox search for plugins reports none found. I believe that this URL
refers to a Coldfusion script. Given the context I am working in I believe
that this script
2015 Sep 08
2
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
I was able to get h.264 support on www.youtube.com/html5 on fedora 21 by
installing
gstreamer1-libav
but that package does not exist in C6 (or it's popular third party repos)
What is the name of the package which adds h.264 to firefox on
youtube/html5 in C6?
2015 Sep 08
0
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
------------ Original Message ------------
> Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 14:57:22 -0700
> From: Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>
>
> I was able to get h.264 support on www.youtube.com/html5 on fedora
> 21 by installing
>
> gstreamer1-libav
>
> but that package does not exist in C6 (or it's popular third party
> repos)
>
> What is the
2015 Sep 11
0
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net>
wrote:
>
>
> > Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 15:24:50 -0700
> > From: Robert Arkiletian <robark at gmail.com>
> >
> >> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Richard wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > Date: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 14:57:22 -0700
>
2015 Sep 12
0
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 6:18 AM, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk>
wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Sep 2015, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane wrote:
>
> If anyone has clues on how to build and add just a portion of
>> gst-plugins-bad into the existing EL OS set of gstreamer plugins, please
>> share (even URL pointers).
>>
>> [1]
>>
2015 Sep 12
0
C6 firefox esr h.264 support on youtube
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 2:36 AM, Nicolas Thierry-Mieg <
Nicolas.Thierry-Mieg at imag.fr> wrote:
> On 09/11/2015 08:11 AM, Robert Arkiletian wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 3:46 PM, Richard <
>> lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net>
>> wrote:
>>
> <snip>
>
>>
>>
>> does anyone running C6 have h.264 check box on