similar to: password problems new centos 6.4 install and sl63 install.

Ahead of the Wednesday’s roundtable at the developers’ conference, here is version three of the proposal for first-class complex types in LLVM. I was not able to add Krzysztof Parzyszek’s suggestion of a “cunzip” intrinsic returning two vectors as I could not find examples of intrinsics that return two values at the IR level. The Hexagon intrinsics declared to return two values do not actually

Hey all, I volunteered to put together a proposal regard complex in LLVM. Consider the following to be a strawman meant to spark discussion. It's based on real-world experience with complex but is not expected to cover all use-cases. Proposal to Support Complex Operations in LLVM ---------------------------------------------- Abstract Several vendors and individuals have proposed

Hi! I want to know if a given element <- ('c64') is part of a vector<- ('c64', 'amiga', 'atari'). Does a function exist for this which gives back a logical value? thankx db

> The C55 and C64 builds diverge in exactly the same place as before (byte > 0x1000). The output from C55 build 11387 (svn head) diverges from C55 build > 11343 slightly later (byte 0x1116). Similarly, the output from C64 build > 11387 (svn head) diverges from C64 build 11343 slightly later (byte 0x1126). > So, your change clearly had an effect, not just on the 16-bit machine,

Hi, I am trying to track down a ISOLINUX boot problem on my workhorse computer. Booting slax-6.0.0-rc5.iso from www.slax.org (a live distro) from CD gives the following messages: Loading /boot/vmlinuz ........... Loading /boot/initrd.gz ............ Ready. _ Silence. The next message should be, but does not appear: Uncompressing Linux ........... This message appears with the same CD on an old

Tim Northover <t.p.northover at gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, 1 Jul 2019 at 19:56, David Greene via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> llvm.creal.* - Overloaded intrinsic to extract the real part of a >> complex value >> declare float @llvm.creal.c32(c32 %Val) >> declare double @llvm.creal.c64(c64 %Val) > > What are

> Why? I'd prefer we avoid introducing even more special cases. Is there > any reason why we should not define "complex <scalar type>", or to be > more restrictive, "complex <floating-point type>"? I really don't like > the idea of excluding 128-bit complex types, and I think that we can > have a generic facility. Hal, we had 128-bit

On 4/3/23 15:50, Michael Milton wrote: > Okay, but I'm afraid this will only mean something to Rust users. The > reason being that we encountered this issue in extendr: a Rust > extension library for R. The specific compiler errors we encounter > happen because bindgen (the Rust code generation library) read the > changed R header files, and generated a new type definition

All, Here is the second revision of the proposal for a complex type in LLVM. It clarifies a few things that came up during discussion and adds additional operations for complex types. -David Proposal to Support Complex Operations in LLVM ---------------------------------------------- Revision History v1 - Initial proposal [1] v2 - This proposal - Added complex of

Hi, There’s growing interest among our users to make better use of dedicated hardware instructions for complex math and I would like to re-start the discussion on the topic. Given that this original thread was started a while ago apologies if I missed anything already discussed earlier on the list or the round-table. The original mail is quoted below. In particular, I’m interested in the AArch64

Hi Tomas, Thanks for this explanation. As you can probably tell I'm not much of a C person, so I didn't realise this change would be invisible to C users. I suppose R's stability contract only applies to C, and therefore changes that break other languages such as Rust are out of scope. You are right that this error is confused by bindgen's inability to handle anonymous types, but

Hi there... I scanned the archives and did some Google'ing ... can find some references to these errors but didn't find a solution. This started when upgrading some servers from 5.5 to 5.6 release. It's net-snmp creating a lot of errors in the /var/log/messages suddenly. I do believe this is only happening on 64 bit installations but not 100% sure yet... [root at mail1

Hello Everyone- I'm in the process of slowly learning R and am having a little bit of trouble plotting an extra line onto a scatterplot. I'm sure the answer is quite simple but I am stumped. The code I am using is: headways <- read.table("headways.csv", header=TRUE, sep=",", na.strings="", dec=".", strip.white=TRUE) plot.new()

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, The shares are browsable again, but the printer can not get detected. If i list the shares from the PC the printer is connected to, it is visible.. But somehow it is not visible in konqueror, en thus not selectable. I used to use the ip adress, but since we are behind a router, these adresses vary... monkey9@tribal-sfn2:~> smbclient -L

Greetings, I have found that QCONST16(32.f, 10) yields different result (from gcc 4.4.7 ) when the code is compiled for TI C55 or C64 DSPs. gcc - result is 32767 TI compiler result is -32768 (C55 compiler version 4.4.1 and C6x compiler version 7.4.2) Although not in the current code, QCONST32(32.f, 26) results differ in similar fashion. Judging by the use #ifdef TI_C.. in the code base, these

> misc.c provides the ability to override some functions, including the > allocation and printing. fftwrap.c uses speex_alloc, then calls > kiss_fftr_alloc, which calls kiss_fft_alloc, which calls KISS_FFT_MALLOC, > which is defined as malloc in kiss_fft.h. It would make it more consistent > to define KISS_FFT_MALLOC as speex_alloc. That is the only change that I > would

Hi, I have following problems compiling bristuff-0.2.0RC8m. Has anybody seen them before and can point me in the right direction? zaphfc/make all: ---------------------- /usr/src/asterisk/bristuff-0.2.0-RC8m/zaphfc/zaphfc.c: In function 'hfc_findCards': /usr/src/asterisk/bristuff-0.2.0-RC8m/zaphfc/zaphfc.c:1000: error: invalid lvalue in assignment make[2]: *** [

Hello everyone. After all the problems I had demoting my DC and managed it to work again, it was working for only a week. Now i am getting this messages on the log: [2014/07/22 16:13:11.745783, 0] .../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_util.c:681(dcerpc_pipe_auth_recv) Failed to bind to uuid e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 for e3514235-4b06-11d1-ab04-00c04fc2dcd2 at

For me, this was a memory allocation problem. I am using a private heap, and somewhere between build 11522 and 11700, the allocation for two large buffers was changed from calloc to speex_alloc (I am sure that this was a cleanup change, and I have not had a chance to locate it yet). This was overrunning my heap, and enlarging the heap solved the problem. I suspect that Itay is having a

Hi, Using llvm-stress, I got a crash after Post-RA pseudo expansion, with machine verifier. A 128 bit register %vreg233:subreg_l32<def,read-undef> = LLCRMux %vreg119; GR128Bit:%vreg233 GRX32Bit:%vreg119 gets spilled: %vreg265:subreg_l32<def,read-undef> = LLCRMux %vreg119; GR128Bit:%vreg265 GRX32Bit:%vreg119 ST128 %vreg265, <fi#10>, 0, %noreg;