similar to: Need help with spec file for Apache-2.4.7

hello list! I am attempting to build an rpm of postfix that includes support for mysql. I've done this before with earlier versions on postfix but I am staring at this spec file until my eyes bleed and I just don't see why when I build the spec with rpmbuild mysql support isn't there. After I install the rpm I have a look at the modules as such: ldd $(which postfix) | grep -i

hello list, I'm trying to build a postfix rpm that has mysql support included. I've found the line where I need to define mysql support but it seems that I am being tripped up by some build dependencies: [root at beta SPECS]# rpmbuild -ba postfix.spec error: Failed build dependencies: MySQL-shared is needed by postfix-2.9.1-1.rhel5.x86_64 MySQL-devel is needed by

* .gitignore: Ignore RPM specfile & coverage data * Build.PL: Generate specfile during build * autobuild.sh: Build control file * virt-v2v.spec.PL: RPM specfile * MANIFEST.SKIP: Ignore test coverage data --- .gitignore | 3 + Build.PL | 3 +- MANIFEST | 3 + MANIFEST.SKIP | 1 + autobuild.sh | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++ virt-v2v.spec.PL | 160

Hi, To to build an RPM from the nut 2.0.3 source I've corrected the old nut.spec.in file. Please find a copy of the slightly updated spec file attached. The changes are documented at the bottom of the spec file. Regards, Will -------------- next part -------------- # don't know how different I can do this %define majorver 2.0 %define version 2.0.3 %define relver 1 %define nutuser

Hi all, While build a rpm from the httpd-2.2.6 sources (spec file included in the source package), i had a situation where packaging would fail at the step where several link are created for "logs" etc directories. <<..snip from httpd.spec...>> # symlinks for /etc/httpd ln -s ../..%{_localstatedir}/log/httpd $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/etc/httpd/logs ln -s ../..%{_localstatedir}/run

These are the changes I made to the spec file related to gobject bindings and gobject introspection. TBH I wasn't sure how to properly package this. Rich. diff --git a/libguestfs.spec b/libguestfs.spec index 095a848..1b6e43d 100644 --- a/libguestfs.spec +++ b/libguestfs.spec @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Summary: Access and modify virtual machine disk images Name: libguestfs Epoch:

On Sat, Sep 26, 2015 at 08:12:40PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > I don't really understand this. > The perl script wants to create /var/run/BackupPC/BackupPC.sock > which it seems it cannot do unless /var/run/BackupPC/ exists. > If as you say this disappears on re-booting, > I don't see how this program could work. Seems like a packaging bug in EPEL. Fedora does this

The patch below modifies the spec file for FC4 RPM builds as follows: 1.) Build binaries using the -lmcheck option; various samba commands and smbd process crash badly without; see, for example: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=164353 2.) The Fedora project's samba RPMS install mount.cifs; it would help to have samba.org's RPMS do the same. It would be nice to

I have recently built and packaged httpd-2.4.9 from source provided by apache.org together with apr-1.5.0 and apr-util-1.5.3. I removed mod_socache_dc from the httpd.spec file so that the complete build provides the following packages: apr-1.5.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm apr-debuginfo-1.5.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm apr-devel-1.5.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm apr-util-1.5.3-1.el6.x86_64.rpm

Hi there, I made up a very simple and generic rpm .spec.in. It's .in, so autoconf can replace the VERSION in it, so there's only one place to maintain the version number. This .spec.in is independent of any distribution and does not include any "advanced" features. It just packages the installed files up. There are two things that it does do extra: 1) create

Updates the installer to handle the scenario in which the guest and admin networks are the same by using an alternative httpd conf. Verified to work (eg oVirt managed vms are bootable) on the oVirt appliance so far. --- conf/ovirt-server.conf | 88 -------------------- installer/bin/ovirt-installer | 11 +--

Hi I am try to write rpm spec for install tomcat on a linux machine.But while build the rpm i found following error + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id /home/rpmbuild/BUILD/Install_tomcat-1.0 extracting debug info from /home/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/Install_tomcat-1.0-1.el6.x86_64/usr/local/jdk1.7.0_13/lib/visualvm/profiler/lib/deployed/jdk16/linux-amd64/libprofilerinterface.so ***

I have a couple of questions regarding openssh.spec and the rpm that gets generated from it. I am using 2.3.0p1 1. Why is openssl a prereq? openssh statically links to openssl during build by default (rightfully so, you don't want your security library a shared object if possible) 2. I don't understand the following line in the spec file during the install step (it makes it not build for

I am taking the liberty of forwarding this message to the list. I am not subscribed to it. If you want to reply to me, please send email to faheem at email.unc.edu Thanks, Faheem Mitha. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Faheem Mitha <faheem at email.unc.edu> Newsgroups: comp.security.ssh Subject: installing OpenSSH rpm on SuSE 6.2 Dear people, I tried

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=260 Summary: Expanded features in spec file. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: openssh-unix-dev at mindrot.org ReportedBy:

I've cleaned up Pekka Savola's newly revised sshd.init and additional sshd-functions and modified them to work they way i've been arguing they should work. Compatibility functions are defined in ./contrib/redhat/sshd-functions, which should get installed no matter what release of Red Hat Linux OpenSSH is getting built for, to be consistent across releases. Specific changes from

Hi, I want to use samba as AD on SLES 11 SP3. And I can make samba 4.5.x into some rpms which works well. Recently I try to build samba 4.8.0 using my spec file which works well on samba4.5.x. But when I test these rpms there is a problem. When I use ldap to access the domain to query some domain info, it remains me the directory service is not operational. This problem also appears in

Hi all, I'm planning to use Bacula in production environment. I've seen the Bacula packages are not provided neither by any official repo nor any third popular repo (as rpmforge). ?Anyone use bacula in CentOS 5? -- Thanks, Jordi Espasa Clofent

The packaging/lsb/rsync.spec file is broken as shipped: It has a "Sept" month (rpmbuild here takes only 3-letter month names), and RH gzips the manpages, so the %files list can't find them. I also added doc/README-SGML and doc/rsync.sgml to the %doc files. Patch follows. Thanks for all the good work! --- rsync-2.5.6/packaging/lsb/rsync.spec.orig 2003-01-28 06:28:35.000000000 +0100

Hello all, Tested the latest snapshot. ssh-keyscan seems to have gone in. :) Two issues about it (patched): 1) the man pages aren't installed, only uninstalled 2) RH spec file (and the others no doubt..) won't include it. General observations: for RSA keys only?, kinda obsoletes contrib/make-ssh-known-hosts*. -- Pekka Savola "Tell me of difficulties surmounted,