Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "RHEL Load Balancer Add-on vs KeepAlived"
2018 Feb 26
1
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
On 02/25/2018 08:29 PM, TomK wrote:
> Hey Guy's,
>
> A success story instead of a question.
>
> With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and
> keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster.? ( Used
> Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled )
>
> If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM
2018 Feb 26
0
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
Hey Guy's,
A success story instead of a question.
With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and
keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used
Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled )
If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM me for the
written up post or I could just post here if the lists allow it.
2017 Sep 17
0
keepalived segfault after upgrade to 7.4
Prior to upgrading to CentOS 7.4 everything was fine, after upgrade I'm
seeing
/etc/keepalived# keepalived -f /etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf --dont-fork
--log-console --log-detail --dump-conf -m -v
Starting VRRP child process, pid=17224
Registering Kernel netlink reflector
Registering Kernel netlink command channel
Registering gratuitous ARP shared channel
Opening file
2018 Feb 26
1
NFS Ganesha HA w/ GlusterFS
I would like to see the steps for reference, can you provide a link or
just post them on mail list?
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:29 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote:
> Hey Guy's,
>
> A success story instead of a question.
>
> With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and
> keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used
2015 Sep 29
3
Keepalived vrrp problem
Hey guys,
I'm trying to install keepalived 1.2.19 on a centos 6.5 machine. I did an
install from source.
And when I start keepalived this is what I'm seeing in the logs. It's
reporting that the VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Now in FAULT state.
Here's more of that log entry:
Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA Keepalived_vrrp[44943]: VRRP Instance = VI_1
Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA
2015 Mar 19
0
CEEA-2015:0703 CentOS 6 keepalived Enhancement Update
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0703
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0703.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
893386b534fbeda5a2f1702fab60cc087b037ece82635bb316c3e13fb5856e83 keepalived-1.2.13-5.el6_6.i686.rpm
x86_64:
2005 Feb 21
1
keepalived on centos 3.4
Is anyone successfully using dag's keepalived-1.1.10-1.1.el3.rf on
centos 3.4?
It's giving me some strange issues (LVS Topology never shows up, even
though I can manually set it w/ ipvsadm)
Attempting to rebuild it has been less than successful, as anyone who
tries will see in their appropriate BUILD/keepalived-1.1.10/config.log
and in the rpmbuild output. It complains about openssl
2011 Oct 18
3
haproxy ssl
hello list,
I am attempting to load balance SSL web servers using haproxy on centos 5.7.
I am using HA-Proxy version 1.4.18
Here is the stanza in the config regarding SSL:
listen https 192.168.1.200:443
mode tcp
balance roundrobin
option forwardfor except 192.168.1.200
option redispatch
maxconn 10000
reqadd X-Forwarded-Proto:\ https
2011 May 18
0
Can't build Keepalived 1.2.1 on CentOS-4
Hello,
I get this error when trying to build Keepalived 1.2.1 on a CentOS-4 box:
# gcc -g -O2 (..) -D_WITH_LVS_ -D_WITH_VRRP_ -c smtp.c
In file included from ../include/vrrp.h:31,
from ../include/smtp.h:34,
from smtp.c:27:
*../include/vrrp_ipaddress.h:32:27: linux/if_addr.h: No such file or directory*
In file included from ../include/vrrp.h:31,
2014 Nov 12
0
Keepalived - spurious failovers
Hello,
We are using CentOS 6.6 and keepalived 1.2.13 on two servers for
failover, no load-balancing. Failover is governed by the NIC being
present, and the Apache and Tomcat processes being present. Both servers
are configured as 'EQUAL' (not master/backup). An initial priority of
100 is set, and if a process or NIC fails, then this is reduced by 60 -
causing a lower priority to be seen
2017 May 26
0
CEBA-2017:1305 CentOS 7 keepalived BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:1305
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1305.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
14c601eb6b4c0822d34a1d0b1feaca81c00f8dd95c1b4ea6a5dfd9d504185c25 keepalived-1.2.13-9.el7_3.x86_64.rpm
Source:
2019 Jul 31
0
CEBA-2019:1877 CentOS 7 keepalived BugFix Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:1877
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:1877
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
259a12a1d3cd1c507dcfbd58d6d6fc63113a2e4ed7c1f5b061526d2426712b5c keepalived-1.3.5-8.el7_6.5.x86_64.rpm
Source:
2019 Jul 25
1
how to increase DNS reliability?
I'm about to do an overhaul of the DNS service at work and my plan is to
use powerdns recursor + dnsdist + keepalived.
---
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
On 2019-07-25 14:28, Leroy Tennison wrote:
> If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client then a
> master and (possibly multiple) slave server configuration can be set
> up (I'm
2019 Jul 25
0
how to increase DNS reliability?
If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client then a master and (possibly multiple) slave server configuration can be set up (I'm assuming ISC DNS - their solution to redundancy/failover is master and slave servers, this may be the way it is with all DNS). keepalived can be used for fail over and will present a single IP address (which the clients would use) shared among the
2011 Mar 08
2
keepalived+LVS
hello,
all!
if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ?
tks!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110308/b8e27203/attachment-0002.html>
2015 Sep 29
1
Keepalived vrrp problem
Em 29-09-2015 15:03, Gordon Messmer escreveu:
> On 09/29/2015 09:14 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
>> And if I do an ifconfig command I see no evidence of an eth1 existing.
>
> "ifconfig -a" will show you all of your interfaces.
Maybe there is a confusion here. Sounds like Tim thought keepalived
would create that eth1, like a tunnel interface, but it won't. You have
to
2003 Jan 31
0
Shorewall and keepalived
I am trying to figure out a way to have the two packages running on the
system. Is there a way to tell shorewall NOT to define IP addresses for a
specific port so keepalived(vrrp) can create them and not cause a
conflict. Or for that matter the other way around would work. Any help
would be appreciated.
2019 Jan 06
0
CESA-2019:0022 Important CentOS 7 keepalived Security Update
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0022 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0022
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
4171b23d7282f67bd3938bcac81eee43583a4936513b5e5346e958087bed3b86 keepalived-1.3.5-8.el7_6.x86_64.rpm
--
Johnny Hughes
CentOS Project {
2005 Mar 15
2
shorewall restart with keepalived (redundant firewalls)
Hello,
First , thanks to Tom for it''s great job ! Netfilter is really easy
and powerfull with shorewall.
So, I have configured two firewalls whith shorewall using keepalived
for the redundant VRRP stuff.
FW-a is MASTER and FW-b is BACKUP.
Everything works correctly and FW-b upgrade to MASTER when FW-a is
down or disconnected. FW-b downgrade to BACKUP when FW-a comes back.
But when I
2019 Jul 25
4
how to increase DNS reliability?
On 7/25/19 3:28 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote:
> If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client
I'm ok with them, only the problem is that the clients take their timeouts
when a server is unreachable, and users panic.
> then a master and (possibly multiple) slave server configuration can be set up (I'm assuming ISC DNS - their solution to redundancy/failover is master