similar to: RHEL Load Balancer Add-on vs KeepAlived

On 02/25/2018 08:29 PM, TomK wrote: > Hey Guy's, > > A success story instead of a question. > > With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and > keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster.? ( Used > Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled ) > > If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM

Hey Guy's, A success story instead of a question. With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used Gluster, NFS Ganesha v2.60, HAPROXY, keepalived w/ selinux enabled ) If someone needs or it could help your work, please PM me for the written up post or I could just post here if the lists allow it.

Prior to upgrading to CentOS 7.4 everything was fine, after upgrade I'm seeing /etc/keepalived# keepalived -f /etc/keepalived/keepalived.conf --dont-fork --log-console --log-detail --dump-conf -m -v Starting VRRP child process, pid=17224 Registering Kernel netlink reflector Registering Kernel netlink command channel Registering gratuitous ARP shared channel Opening file

I would like to see the steps for reference, can you provide a link or just post them on mail list? On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 4:29 AM, TomK <tomkcpr at mdevsys.com> wrote: > Hey Guy's, > > A success story instead of a question. > > With your help, managed to get the HA component working with HAPROXY and > keepalived to build a fairly resilient NFS v4 VM cluster. ( Used

Hey guys, I'm trying to install keepalived 1.2.19 on a centos 6.5 machine. I did an install from source. And when I start keepalived this is what I'm seeing in the logs. It's reporting that the VRRP_Instance(VI_1) Now in FAULT state. Here's more of that log entry: Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA Keepalived_vrrp[44943]: VRRP Instance = VI_1 Sep 29 12:06:58 USECLSNDMNRDBA

CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2015:0703 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2015-0703.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 893386b534fbeda5a2f1702fab60cc087b037ece82635bb316c3e13fb5856e83 keepalived-1.2.13-5.el6_6.i686.rpm x86_64:

Is anyone successfully using dag's keepalived-1.1.10-1.1.el3.rf on centos 3.4? It's giving me some strange issues (LVS Topology never shows up, even though I can manually set it w/ ipvsadm) Attempting to rebuild it has been less than successful, as anyone who tries will see in their appropriate BUILD/keepalived-1.1.10/config.log and in the rpmbuild output. It complains about openssl

hello list, I am attempting to load balance SSL web servers using haproxy on centos 5.7. I am using HA-Proxy version 1.4.18 Here is the stanza in the config regarding SSL: listen https 192.168.1.200:443 mode tcp balance roundrobin option forwardfor except 192.168.1.200 option redispatch maxconn 10000 reqadd X-Forwarded-Proto:\ https

Hello, I get this error when trying to build Keepalived 1.2.1 on a CentOS-4 box: # gcc -g -O2 (..) -D_WITH_LVS_ -D_WITH_VRRP_ -c smtp.c In file included from ../include/vrrp.h:31, from ../include/smtp.h:34, from smtp.c:27: *../include/vrrp_ipaddress.h:32:27: linux/if_addr.h: No such file or directory* In file included from ../include/vrrp.h:31,

Hello, We are using CentOS 6.6 and keepalived 1.2.13 on two servers for failover, no load-balancing. Failover is governed by the NIC being present, and the Apache and Tomcat processes being present. Both servers are configured as 'EQUAL' (not master/backup). An initial priority of 100 is set, and if a process or NIC fails, then this is reduced by 60 - causing a lower priority to be seen

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2017:1305 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2017-1305.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 14c601eb6b4c0822d34a1d0b1feaca81c00f8dd95c1b4ea6a5dfd9d504185c25 keepalived-1.2.13-9.el7_3.x86_64.rpm Source:

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2019:1877 Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:1877 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 259a12a1d3cd1c507dcfbd58d6d6fc63113a2e4ed7c1f5b061526d2426712b5c keepalived-1.3.5-8.el7_6.5.x86_64.rpm Source:

I'm about to do an overhaul of the DNS service at work and my plan is to use powerdns recursor + dnsdist + keepalived. --- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! On 2019-07-25 14:28, Leroy Tennison wrote: > If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client then a > master and (possibly multiple) slave server configuration can be set > up (I'm

If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client then a master and (possibly multiple) slave server configuration can be set up (I'm assuming ISC DNS - their solution to redundancy/failover is master and slave servers, this may be the way it is with all DNS). keepalived can be used for fail over and will present a single IP address (which the clients would use) shared among the

hello, all! if i want to use lvs function of keepalived , i must install ipvsadm ? tks! -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20110308/b8e27203/attachment-0002.html>

Em 29-09-2015 15:03, Gordon Messmer escreveu: > On 09/29/2015 09:14 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: >> And if I do an ifconfig command I see no evidence of an eth1 existing. > > "ifconfig -a" will show you all of your interfaces. Maybe there is a confusion here. Sounds like Tim thought keepalived would create that eth1, like a tunnel interface, but it won't. You have to

I am trying to figure out a way to have the two packages running on the system. Is there a way to tell shorewall NOT to define IP addresses for a specific port so keepalived(vrrp) can create them and not cause a conflict. Or for that matter the other way around would work. Any help would be appreciated.

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2019:0022 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0022 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 4171b23d7282f67bd3938bcac81eee43583a4936513b5e5346e958087bed3b86 keepalived-1.3.5-8.el7_6.x86_64.rpm -- Johnny Hughes CentOS Project {

Hello, First , thanks to Tom for it''s great job ! Netfilter is really easy and powerfull with shorewall. So, I have configured two firewalls whith shorewall using keepalived for the redundant VRRP stuff. FW-a is MASTER and FW-b is BACKUP. Everything works correctly and FW-b upgrade to MASTER when FW-a is down or disconnected. FW-b downgrade to BACKUP when FW-a comes back. But when I

On 7/25/19 3:28 PM, Leroy Tennison wrote: > If you don't want multiple DNS server entries on the client I'm ok with them, only the problem is that the clients take their timeouts when a server is unreachable, and users panic. > then a master and (possibly multiple) slave server configuration can be set up (I'm assuming ISC DNS - their solution to redundancy/failover is master