similar to: Scriptaculous and DWR

My company uses DWR as our AJAX library to deal with our Java code on the back-end. I would really like to use script.aculo.usto do all the cool things it can do. Unfortunately, it seems the DWR and script.aculo.us/prototype have functions and variables that use the same names. Is there a good way to place script.aculo.us in it''s own namespace? Has someone experienced a similar

Hello Everyone, Does anyone have any insight into the DWR library (http://getahead.ltd.uk/dwr/index)? I want to know the pros/cons of using DWR Vs Prototype/Scriptaculous libraries. I am a great fan of the prototype/scriptaculous combination and have been working with them for the last 3-4 months but for some reasons I have been asked to look into DWR. Due to it''s tight integration

I''m curious if anyone has used Scriptaculous and DWR in conjunction with each other. I''ve got a conversion coming up that I like Script.. for its drag-n-drop stuff and DWR for its Java integration. Jamie

Isn''t the difference that the scriptaculous one only gets child nodes from the node you specify, whereas the prototype one gets all in the entire document? Still, it would be nice to just have the one, and let you pass in the document element if you wanted all of them. Just guessing, really. I haven''t looked at the code in question. Greg > -----Original Message----- >

I seem to recall the Effect.Appear setting the final opacity to 0.99 to avoid some bug on some browser; anyone remember the specifics? Seems like we should probably just conditionally check for the broken browser and set to 0.99 for only that one, otherwise leave it at 1.0, but I know I don''t have the full picture of why it was necessary or whether it still is. Greg

I saw a Flash-based photo-flipper on TagWorld ( http://www.tagworld.com/thepostalservice) and thought it would be nice to do something similar in Scripaculous. Anyone interested in taking a shot at it? Since rotation isn''t supported in CSS, what I would imagine would be a z-ordered "stack" of DIVs, possibly of slightly different sizes or just x/y-offset a bit from each other.

What I have so far. In my main HTML: <script type="text/javascript" src="/javascripts/tiny_mce/tiny_mce_src.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> tinyMCE.init({ mode: "textareas", theme: ''advanced'', theme_advanced_toolbar_location: ''top'' }); ... </script> My Ajax form

Hi ! I'm getting an uncaught exception requiring the Scriptaculous libraries when everything says XHTML 1.0 Strict: class ApplicationController < ActionController::Base before_filter :set_content_type protected def set_content_type response.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/xhtml+xml; charset=ISO-8859-1' end end <?xml version="1.0"

Is there a reason scriptaculous provides what appears to be a redundant function? The reason I''m asking is that it only seems to be used twice throughout all of scriptaculous, and it doesn''t appear to work properly (for some reason it''s returning the actual element, rather than an array with all of the elements) If there is no reason, I''ll modify it to use

I was wondering whether somebody could point me to some documentation on how I would convert a moofx class to scriptaculous. Please see this very basic class: fx.ScrollThumbs = Class.create(); fx.ScrollThumbs.prototype = Object.extend(new fx.Base(), { initialize: function(el, options) { this.el = $(el);

Hello, I''m working with scriptaculous, and i''ve narrowed down a bug i''m having to the following code: http://rate.urbanpug.com I''m using the latest release (as of sending this mail) of scriptaculous. I''ve actually seen this bug before, and random tweaking fixed it. Unfortunately, i can''t figure it out this time. I''ve reduced the bug

Using older versions of prototype.js (1.4.0_rc2) and scriptaculous (1.5._rc4), I had a master table containg other tables (sections), each of which had rows. Using tbody''s as containers, I could drag the section tables up and down over the other section tables AND drag the rows in a section table up and down within that table or into the rows of the other section tables, all very

Hi folks. I''m working on a project where I need some drag and drop, but I need to implement what happens in a very different way, so I''m creating my own class for it. I don''t want to reinvent the wheel and redo Thomas'' excellent drag/drop functionality, nor do I want to copy/paste his code over into mine. So, I was wondering, has anyone tried to extract

Issue 1: <%= @pic %> instead of <% @pic %> -----Original Message----- From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of rails-spinoffs-request-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 11:13 PM To:

Joe Athman St. Paul Travelers - IS Investments 651-310-7597 -----Original Message----- From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of Athman,Joseph J Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:14 PM To: rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org Subject:

Trying the accordion feature as offered at: http://wiki.script.aculo.us/scriptaculous/show/accordion+feature The objective is to remove the "jump" reported in the Rico accordion feature. My demo of the scriptaculous feature, however has a noticeable jump when tested if FireFox. and IE Win. See: http://www.jimdavis.org/accord3.html Have I implemented this incorrectly? Jim

Yea that''s what I am seeing also. Think I got round this before by turning the structure into a table :( Andrew - Thanks for your input.. > -----Original Message----- > From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On > Behalf Of Andrew Tetlaw > Sent:

Nope, nothing new. I haven''t had time to get back to it since I last posted the code, but I might over the next few days as there''s a bit of a lull at work. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs- > bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org] On Behalf Of

I never got it to work back on one of the early release candidates of scriptaculous 1.5. However, I thought I read in one of the release notes that it was fixed. Are you using the latest version? I ended up just disabling the sortable while they were in ''editing'' mode, and then recreating it after they were done editing. Greg > -----Original Message----- > From:

Hi Guys, I'm currently using the Dojo Rich text editor on my site https://wideword.net but am not 100% happy with it as I'm a prototype kind of guy. So I started writing this Rich Text Editor the other day on an experiment. I used the In Place Editor as a template for it and have gotten it to more or less work under IE and Gecko. Unfortunately it still isn't working on Safari ( The