similar to: Pairing Data 2-D array

On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 1:53 PM, Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> wrote: > These are supported on GK20A and GM107. > > Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> > --- > > Was a bit torn on where to place the enums... we're about to gut all > the xml definitions so this seemed appropriate for now. > > Tested on GK20A only. > >

From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> We've previously had identical naming between vertex and texture formats, so it mostly made sense to define these together. However, upcoming patches are going to transition the driver over to using updated texture header definitions using NVIDIA's naming, and this will no longer be the case. Signed-off-by: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at

I sent this in with an old version, but it's in latest version as well. The fix is simple. In the summary.table function, the parameter is calculated incorrectly for a test of independence among all cells when the table is more than 2-way table. Example: Consider X: > X a b c 1 A1 B2 C1 2 A3 BA3 C2 3 A2 B1 C4 4 A1 B2 C3 5 A3 BA3 C2 6 A1 BA3 C1 7 A2 BA3 C2 8 A1

These are supported on GK20A and GM107. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Was a bit torn on where to place the enums... we're about to gut all the xml definitions so this seemed appropriate for now. Tested on GK20A only. src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nv50/nv50_formats.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/nvc0/nvc0_screen.c | 10 ++++

Why not fix the new names instead to be like the old names? Seems like that would be way simpler... On Feb 15, 2016 12:38 AM, "Ben Skeggs" <skeggsb at gmail.com> wrote: > From: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs at redhat.com> > > We've previously had identical naming between vertex and texture > formats, so it mostly made sense to define these together. > > However,

I'm attempting to create an array of treatment comparisons for modelling data generation. This involves comparison of one treatment (c2) with another (c3), relative to a common comparator (c1). Attached code gives me the correct array but need to remove duplicates. Duplicates relate only to c2 and c3 such that I need to remove r3 because c2 and c3 are same as r1 with c2 and c3 swapped r5

Hello I have a dataframe with 3 columns C1, C2 and C3. C1 and C2 are numerical data and C3 is the date of the data (format : %Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S") With the lattice package, I would like to plot C1 as function of C2 sorted by the dates, that is something like : xyplot(C1 ~ C2 | as.Date(C3)) It plots somethings but not the truth. I have compared the output with the output of this script

Hi, I have a three dimensional array, e.g., my.array = array(0, dim=c(2,3,4), dimnames=list( d1=c("A1","A2"), d2=c("B1","B2","B3"), d3=c("C1","C2","C3","C4")) ) what I would like to get is then a dataframe: d1 d2 d3 value A1 B1 C1 0 A2 B1 C1 0 . . . A2 B3 C4 0 I'm sure there is one function to do

Hello. I'm trying to make k-step-ahead forecasts using ARFIMA(0, d, 0) models by taking the first T+k-1 coefficients in the binomial expansion of (1-B)^d, regarding (1-B)^d x(T+k) as an AR(T+k-1) on x(T+k), where x(T) is the series value at time T and k = 1, 2, 3, . That is, I forecast the series k values forward using the first T+k-1 coefficients in the binomial expansion of (1-B)^d as

Dear all, A question on modelling proportional data in R. I have a test experiment that was designed in a particular way, and which I can analyse "by hand" to an extent. I am really struggling to get R to give me sensible results in modelling it "properly", so must be doing something wrong here. As background, I conduct a series of experiments and count the

Dear useRs, Thanks for any advices # I do not know where are the examples how to mark groups # based on signal occurence in the additional variable: cf. variable c2, # How to calculate different calculations for groups defined by (split by occurence of c2 characteristic data) #First example of simple data #mexample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

sapply() stems from S / S+ times and hence has a long tradition. In spite of that I think that it should be enhanced... As the subject mentions, sapply() produces a matrix in cases where the list components of the lapply(.) results are of the same length (and ...). However, it unfortunately "stops there". E.g., if you *nest* two sapply() calls where the inner one produces a matrix, very

[I originally sent this to R-bugs@stat.math.ethz.ch and it didn't bounce, but when I received no response I thought I had better check to see if I had the correct address.] System: Sun Solaris 2.5.1 R: Version 0.65.1 Release (October 07, 1999) There seem to be at least 2 bugs associated with the use of flush=T in the scan function. 1) If flush=T is used, scan() will only ask for 1 line from

System: Sun Solaris 2.5.1 There seem to be at least 2 bugs associated with the use of flush=T in the scan function. 1) If flush=T is used, scan() will only ask for 1 line from standard input. Repeat by: > R R : Copyright 1999, The R Development Core Team Version 0.65.1 Release (October 07, 1999) R is free software and comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. You are welcome to redistribute it

Hello, I am relatively new to R, and I am trying to select the last observation within a group, where the group is defined by two variables. One of the variables is a date. In the below example, C3 varies within C2, which varies within C1. I need to select the last observation in C3 for 4 groups (C1*C2): 1x, 1y, 2x, and 2y. In my real dataset, C2 is a date (mm/dd/yy) C1 C2 C3 1 x 1 1

=BE=B4=C6=F4=D5=DF=A3=BA =A1=B0=B5=DA=CB=C4=BD=EC=B1=B1=BE=A9=B3=AF=D1=F4=B9=FA=BC=CA=C9=CC=CE=F1= =BD=DA=A1=B1=BD=AB=D3=DA2003=C4=EA10=D4=C2=D4=DA=B1=B1=BE=A9=BE=D9=B0=EC=A1= =A3=BD=EC=CA=B1=A3=AC=B9=FA=BC=D2=C1=EC=B5=BC=C8=CB=A1=A2=CD=E2=B9=FA=D5=FE= =D2=AA=BA=CD=C0=B4=D7=D4=C3=C0=A1=A2=B5=C2=A1=A2=B7=A8=A1=A2=B0=C4=B4=F3=C0=

I have the following situation I want to analyse with prcomp. Each subject has a curve called the contrast sensitivity function (CSF). This curve's overall shape is due to the additive output of 3 "channels" (eigenvectors). #this shows 3 SF channels; net CSF = c1 + c2+c3 x<-1:100 c1<-dnorm(x,mean=20,sd=20) c2<-dnorm(x,mean=50,sd=20) c3<-dnorm(x,mean=80,sd=20)

Hi all, I frequently encounter datasets that require me to repeat the same calculation across many variables. For example, given a dataset with total employment variables and manufacturing employment variables for the years 1990-2010, I might have to calculate manufacturing's share of total employment in each year. I find it cumbersome to have to manually define a share for each year and

I need to know how to do the following in puppet. Say I have three classes, (c1,c2,c3) that are not related. These classes could be considered "attributes" that may or may not apply to an individual host on my network. I need to know how to write a manifest, or series of manifests to allow me trigger a command (call it ''foo'') if all three classes are defined. I also

hello, i can't figure out how to set position of panels of my stripplot - i`d like the panels of one level of the factor stage (nr. of panels within each stage, A: 12, B: 12, C: 12, D: 4, each panel representing a site) to be in one column, with A to D from left to right and with descending site.nr at each row. like: A1 B1 C1 D1 A2 B2 .. .. A3 .. .. .. how is this achieved? any help