similar to: Validates inclusion of include fails at plugin.

The parts of klibc specific to the x86_64 architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit f889dd04bef1aed36ba18161c727af47338e167a tree c25f184d2e3337b52dfe3abd191ec639d4d9543d parent f30fa3db62972125afa68d3b53d03cdb843d3bbd author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:53 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

The parts of klibc specific to the ia64 architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 951dc85bd690c6cc5a971815665da947160cbe51 tree 0843c8aa67a3c46a362d12c392c41c25d85ac9cd parent bd0599e5290ca1a16bb7a68f7c362d395c612eb3 author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:24 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

Dear R-Helpers, I want to compare the results of outputs from glmmPQL and lmer analyses. I could do this if I could extract the coefficients and standard errors from the summaries of the lmer models. This is easy to do for the glmmPQL summaries, using > glmm.fit <- try(glmmPQL(score ~ x*type, random = ~ 1 | subject, data = df, family = binomial), TRUE) > summary(glmmPQL.fit)$tTable

The parts of klibc specific to the ppc architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit a82c9b6e9b3428bae592241d1ac276054bc46fc5 tree 70852f39dd495c9bffc307d38f6da673d91ab08a parent 078d6614054391efe17093f8d70340e2c0644ffb author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:37 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

The parts of klibc specific to the ppc64 architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 6db62c809bf46ac8a9f743513384d29fd339f877 tree e4850136d00d6b9fc1d5fb7eae9a329ac79947e1 parent a82c9b6e9b3428bae592241d1ac276054bc46fc5 author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:40 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

Hi, I wrote yesterday ( http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails-spinoffs/2005-November/001307.h tml ), but with no replies. This mail is not to spam, just a further clarification of the problem: This little bit of code illustrates the problem: <script language="javascript"> function ac(elm) { var val = $F(''val''); new

Hi: We are currently building an internal solution based on LLVM/Clang technologies which involves generating LLVM IR based on Bitcode generated by Clang from C codes. We have a C function which prototype looks like the following: typedef struct { int (*allocFunction)(void* x, void* y); void* YY; } Type4; int bar (Type1 *x, Type2 *y, Type3 *z, Type4 bar) When we compile this code

The parts of klibc specific to the s390 architecture. Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> --- commit 418ab99cc64fed344e2d3e446208f48655cccb31 tree 958352848ed34bcf1aacdf5357ba453f96e38cbb parent 6db62c809bf46ac8a9f743513384d29fd339f877 author H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun 2006 16:58:42 -0700 committer H. Peter Anvin <hpa at zytor.com> Sun, 25 Jun

Hi, I have a question regarding the LLParser and the new type system rewrite when running the JIT. I think there may be a problem with the parser not picking up on named types currently defined in a given Module (global context). However, I don't have much experience with the LLVM internals so there's a good chance that I'm not fully understanding the new changes ;) For Example:

Merge s390 and s390x into s390. Compiled and tested on s390/s390x and i386. Also cross compilation for s390/s390x tested. This patch shouldn't break the build of any architecture. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> --- Makefile | 1 scripts/Kbuild.install | 4 +- scripts/Kbuild.klibc

From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Merge s390 and s390x into s390. Patch is against current linux-2.6-klibc tree and seems to work. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> --- As a side note: a bitops patch is missing to make this working. Martin will send it soon. If it's needed earlier I can send it as well. Makefile

Using the LLVM C++ API, if I want to create an array via an Alloca instruction like: Value *a = ir_builder.CreateAlloca( my_type, my_size ); and then I want to initialize each element of the array with values computed elsewhere like: for ( vector<Value*>::const_iterator i = v.begin(); i != v.end(); ++i ) { builder.CreateStore( *i, a ); // How do I increment 'a' to point to

You've omitted a comma. races2000 is a data frame, which for purposes of extracting rows behaves like a 2-dimenional object. The following works fine: hills2000 <- races2000[races2000$type == 'hill', ] Additionally, you might like to ponder > type <- races2000[names(races2000)=="type"] > type[1:4] Error in "[.data.frame"(type, 1:4) :

Dear R help list, I have a training dataset that looks like Table1. I have an unknown dataset that looks like Table2. I want to have a program that should search the training dataset and identify that the unknown sample belongs to which category (type1, type2 or type3) and also if the unknown does not belong to any of the categories, it should let me know. The real dataset has 600 variables and

Dear R help list, I have a training dataset that looks like Table1. I have an unknown dataset that looks like Table2. I want to have a program that should search the training dataset and identify that the unknown sample belongs to which category (type1, type2 or type3) and also if the unknown does not belong to any of the categories, it should let me know. The real dataset has 600 variables and

Hi All, New to R, but committed. I looked in a number of places but can't figure out my current problem. I have date of the type: Time Type1 Type2 Type3 1 .50 .25 .25 4 .55 .25 .20 5 .65 .20 .15 etc which describe the frequency of types 1, 2 and 3 (adding up to 100%) over time. I would like to create a stacked bar chart showing these

Hello, I have to run a general linear mixed model which looks at 2 dependent variables at the same time (var1 divided by var2). I have tryed to search for such a kind of model structure but since I just started using R my search was not successful. Especielly since I only have an old SAS GENMOD code structure from my project supervisor as an indication. My question is no, does there exist a code

Hello, I would like to be able to update an existing column in a dataframe, like this... data$score[data$type=="1" & data$year=="2001"]<-data$score * 0.111 data$score[data$type=="1" & data$year=="2002"]<-data$score * 0.222 data$score[data$type=="1" & data$year=="2003"]<-data$score * 0.333 ...but, if possible,

Hi all, A while ago there was a discussion on changing the current "set of trees" representation of TBAA metadata to be more expressive, prompted by the need to support C structs. Dan Gohman also talked about the issue here: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2012-11/Gohman-AliasAnalysis.pdf. It was suggested that the trees be replaced by a type DAG then. While working on this compiler

Basic question: I looked around quite a bit, still having a little trouble manipulating the distance between the Y-axis label and the plot. In this case, I would like to move the Y axis title closer to the plot. # Data tC <- textConnection(" Time Type1 Type2 Type3 1.3 .50 .10 .40 4.5 .45 .20 .35 5.2 .40 .30 .30 ") data1 <- read.table(header=TRUE, tC) data2 <-