similar to: Best practices: client/server VS Git

*Hi guys!* * * *I''m trying to perform a service creation using SC and if this service is already created, using an "unless" we can avoid it. * *Sound very simple, but for any reason, when instructions are called by puppet they are not working instead you call directly, same instructions, using DOS, where works sweet.* * * *Here is part of the code:* $cmd =

Hi all, First of all, as this is my first post, please accept my appologies if I have posted this to the wrong place. Any help, advice or guidance is always gratefully received :) I''m pretty new to Ruby and Ruby on Rails - in fact I only picked up the books a couple of days ago and already I''m thinking of porting some of my apps across! At present I''m working on a

Everyone, I am in the process of migrating over a samba Linux VM from an openvz based system to a vmware based system.? I am migrating over these services: apache samba rsync (daemon via xinetd) I'm trying to improve my documentation and I want to make a linux vm best practices SOP that can be used as the template for all new server setups.? Does anyone have any similar kinds of

On 2015-08-06 18:55, Roel van Meer wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I'm testing with a Samba4 AD network, and I have some problems with > DNS on the second DC, with which I could use a bit of your help. > > I have an AD with two DC's, both Samba 4.2.3. On the first DC, > samba_dnsupdate works fine. With stock 4.2.3 I get the error > > "TSIG error with

check the rights on : /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab 640 root:bind /var/lib/samba/private/dns 750 root:bind /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d 750 root:bind Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Roel van Meer >Verzonden: donderdag 6 augustus 2015 8:55 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: [Samba] 2nd

Hi, I am upgrading a Rails application from Rails 3.1.11 to 3.2.12, but have a problem with ` accepts_nested_attributes_for` in conjunction with multipart attributes. The app is used to manage oral exams, so there is a model `Exam`, which has many `Examdate`s. When creating an exam, I can also create the examdates, consisting of a date, a start time and an end time. While the date field is

is the time in sync on your servers ? >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Roel van Meer >Verzonden: donderdag 6 augustus 2015 9:28 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] 2nd DC, internal DNS: >dns_tkey_negotiategss: TKEY is unacceptable > >L.P.H. van Belle writes: > >> check the rights

Hey Aki Tuomi, how are you doing? I have tried many ways for getting 2.2.35 pre-built installed via 'apt-get install' in Debian Jessie and Stretch using the official repos. The reason I prefer to install pre-built instead of compiling it is because the I run it on dockers, so it's a lot easier and automated to just apt-get install it. I was using 2.2.31 devel in Debian Jessie, I

Hi everyone, I'm testing with a Samba4 AD network, and I have some problems with DNS on the second DC, with which I could use a bit of your help. I have an AD with two DC's, both Samba 4.2.3. On the first DC, samba_dnsupdate works fine. With stock 4.2.3 I get the error "TSIG error with server: tsig verify failure" but the DNS updates succeed anyway, and after applying

On 06/08/15 09:08, Roel van Meer wrote: > L.P.H. van Belle writes: > >> is the time in sync on your servers ? > > Yes it is. > > I managed to make it work by specifying the primary DC as nameserver > in /etc/resolv.conf of the secondary DC. As soon as I do that, > samba_dnsupdate works on the secondary. When I change it back to use > the local Samba as resolver,

L.P.H. van Belle writes: > check the rights on : > /var/lib/samba/private/dns.keytab 640 root:bind > /var/lib/samba/private/dns 750 root:bind > /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d 750 root:bind I'm using the internal DNS on both DC's, so I guess bind access rights aren't the issue. Thanks for your answer though :) Regards, Roel > >-----Oorspronkelijk

Got 2.2.34 running using debian strech image + strech-backports repos! Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 9:37 PM, Webert de Souza Lima <webert.boss at gmail.com > wrote: > Oh thank you Cedric, I hadn't check that. So 2.2.35 is unstable, huh? > I'll deploy 2.2.34 instead. > >

Hi! 2.2.35 is not unstable, but apparently it is in debian distribution, which is called 'unstable'. Aki On 27.04.2018 06:16, Webert de Souza Lima wrote: > Got 2.2.34 running using debian strech image + strech-backports repos! > > > Regards, > > Webert Lima > DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia > *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* > *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* > > On

L.P.H. van Belle writes: > is the time in sync on your servers ? Yes it is. I managed to make it work by specifying the primary DC as nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf of the secondary DC. As soon as I do that, samba_dnsupdate works on the secondary. When I change it back to use the local Samba as resolver, it no longer works. So it is a DNS issue (possibly related to replication

Dear All, I'm trying to model heteroscedasticity using a multilevel model. To do so, I make use of the nlme package and the weigths-parameter. Let's say that I hypothesize that the exam score of students (normexam) is influenced by their score on a standardized LR test (standLRT). Students are of course nested in "schools". These variables are contained in the

Hi all Jeff McCune and I are going to be at the SoCAL DevOps meet-up tomorrow night: http://socaldevopsmeetup.eventbrite.com/ So if you''re in the area and want to chat about Puppet, configuration management or DevOps then come down. Or even if you''d just like to have a beer. :) Also of interest to LAX peoples is a Puppet Labs training being run Aug 17-19. The link is below

To add to the social aspect, I can say from personal experience (as a student/enthusiast developer) that contributing to open source projects that use a decentralized SCM model (e.g. git) is easier than a centralized (e.g. subversion) model. I can create a clone on github (or local, or wherever), commit all that I want, then send pull requests or patches to the upstream maintainers. With a

Oh thank you Cedric, I hadn't check that. So 2.2.35 is unstable, huh? I'll deploy 2.2.34 instead. Thank you! Regards, Webert Lima DevOps Engineer at MAV Tecnologia *Belo Horizonte - Brasil* *IRC NICK - WebertRLZ* On Thu, Apr 26, 2018 at 7:51 PM, Cedric M <cedric.malitte at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > did you check in unstable ? > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/dovecot

Chris Lattner wrote: > The more I've thought about this, the more that I'm beginning to realize > that CVS is the root of the problem. Perhaps it is time for LLVM to > seriously start looking at switching over to a decentralized version > control system? I really am not "up" on the various options, but I've > heard rumars that there are now several good

Running some company specific software, which is an exam/test. It runs fine on Windows OS machines. On Vista machines it requires the addition of the msvbvm50.dll. The exam has a minimum of two sections of questions, say topic A, and topic B. When installed in WINE, it has required the addition of jet40 and vb5run in winetricks to make the program run. Running the exam with the minimum 2 topics