similar to: btrfs on bcache

Dan Williams wrote: > The consensus from LSF was that bcache need not invent a new interface > when md and dm can both do the job. As mentioned in patch 7 this series > aims to be a minimal conversion. Other refactoring items like > deprecating register_lock for mddev->reconfig_mutex are deferred. > > This supports assembly of an already established cache array: > >

Hi! I would like to conduct a Cochran`s Q Test in R, but have not found any suitable function. My first idea was: J <- as.table(matrix(c(6,16,2,4),ncol=2, dimnames = list("C" = c("Favorable","Unfavorable"),"Drug A Favorable"=c("B Favorable","B Unfavorable")))) L <- as.table(matrix(c(2,4,6,6),ncol=2, dimnames =

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet at google.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet at google.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet at google.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

I just add a partition /dev/sdb3 and use "mkswap /dev/sdb3" to make it swap space. How can I label the /dev/sdb3 like "SWAP-sdb3"? what I want is put on /etc/fstab as entry like: LABEL=SWAP-sdb2 swap swap defaults 0 0 LABEL=SWAP-sdb3 swap swap defaults 0 0 Thanks

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

More prep work for immutable biovecs - with immutable bvecs drivers won't be able to use the biovec directly, they'll need to use helpers that take into account bio->bi_iter.bi_bvec_done. This updates callers for the new usage without changing the implementation yet. Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo at daterainc.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe at kernel.dk> Cc: Geert

Hi, the situation: Label: ''RootFS''  uuid: c87975a0-a575-405e-9890-d3f7f25bbd96     Total devices 2 FS bytes used 284.98GB     devid    2 size 311.82GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sdb3     devid    1 size 897.76GB used 286.51GB path /dev/sda3 RootFS created when sda3 was 897.76GB and sdb3 311.82GB. I have now freed other space on sdb. So I deleted sdb3 and recreated it occupying all

I got the following error, but there''s no "cycle" I commented out File["/dev/sdb3"] and it works, but of course would choke if I ran it and the requirement were not met err: Could not apply complete catalog: Found cycles in the following relationships: File[/dev/sdb1] => Exec[echo -e "0,290\n,290\n," | sfdisk /dev/sdb] Here''s the node: node

Recently our sysadm accidentally powercycled our server (RedHat8) after 198 days of uptime, and upon boot it insisted on checking one partition (/dev/sda7) in our RAID. When it was done, the files were in the state of August 23 last year, with anything newer either gone or invisible. I guess something went wrong with journaling data. What can I do to restore the current state (except restore from

Chainloading a Linux system with syslinux fails unexpectedly with the lines: WARN: No MBR magic, treating disk as raw. ERR: Unable to find requested disk / partition combination. boot: coming after the usual lines SyslinuxBOOT .... (in UEFI menu) linuxBLFS (in syslinux menu) SUMMARY (additional gory details available upon request) ~~~~~~~~~

Hi, I have two 320 GB SATA disks (/dev/sda, /dev/sdb) in a server running CentOS release 5. They both have three partitions setup as RAID1 using md (boot, swap, and an LVM data partition). # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sdb1[1] sda1[0] 104320 blocks [2/2] [UU] md1 : active raid1 sdb2[1] sda2[0] 4192896 blocks [2/2] [UU] md2 : active raid1 sdb3[1]