similar to: *-{up,down} env vars

On 12 November 2015 at 01:15, fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> wrote: > Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: >> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved >> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client >> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very >> user-friendly, though.

fauno <fauno at kiwwwi.com.ar> writes: > Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: >> (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved >> simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client >> process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very >> user-friendly, though. Especially on Windows.) >

On 11 November 2015 at 21:57, David Nicol <davidnicol at gmail.com> wrote: > it is entirely possible to write code that uses threads on Win32 and forks > on POSIX by abstracting the communication bits generically. Signalling could > work over pipes on both. > > https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365152(v=vs.85).aspx Hum... yes of course, but I

William Kennington <william at wkennington.com> writes: > Agreed. > On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > >> Considering how cheap that operation seems to be, would it make sense >> to call res_init() every time tinc retries a metaconnection? It's not >> doing that very often anyway... and it would solve

Am 02.02.2015 um 19:32 schrieb Nicol?s Reynolds: > William Kennington <william-5Om/gJxqp8Dx9BLsLxWUfA at public.gmane.org> writes: > >> Agreed. >> On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne-ypMCQUleWbRvynnTyRI/EA at public.gmane.org> wrote: >> >>> Considering how cheap that operation seems to be, would it make sense >>> to

Folks I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home server via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my home network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for any external query, but also let me access my computers inside my home. I already have this working using M$'s PPTP using my home Centos 6 gateway/router as the PoPToP server.

IPSec is not recommended solution nowdays. OpenVPN runs top of single udp or tcp port, so it usually works on strictly firewalled places like in hotels and so on. -- Eero 2016-04-04 23:18 GMT+03:00 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > On 04/04/2016 10:57 AM, david wrote: > >> I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan (and >> probably

Etienne Dechamps <etienne at edechamps.fr> writes: > (I realize that this means UPnP support could possibly be achieved > simply by suggesting that the user spawn some standalone UPnP client > process in the background from the tinc-up hook. That's not very > user-friendly, though. Especially on Windows.) something like this :P

On Sun, Feb 1, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Guus Sliepen <guus at tinc-vpn.org> wrote: > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 04:08:47PM +0900, crocket wrote: > >> If tincd is started before name resolution comes up, it keeps failing >> for ever to resolve domain names in Address= host configuration >> variable after name resolution becomes possible. >> >> I think tincd should

Greetings! I''m trying to set an environment variable in Rails. Why? I can''t use RMagick unless I do so. I can do it from the shell, run irb, and then require ''RMagick'' works. So far so good. But how can I do this from my application? I''m on a shared host so I''ve put in a ticket to have something like this added to httpd.conf: SetEnv

Hello. For the purposes of backporting, can you please confirm the relevant change for the environment variable security fix in 6.6 is: http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb/src/usr.bin/ssh/session.c.diff?r1=1.270;r2=1.271 FYI, not sure if the request originated with OpenBSD/OpenSSH but this has been assigned CVE-2014-2532. Thanks. --mancha

Are the dovecot environment variables mutable? I'd like to override like: set "${env.vnd.dovecot.username}" "someuser at example.org" Or better, I prefer to override %u Dovecot variable during the userdb lookup. Is either possible? PS, when Sieve does extdata lookups for username key, where does username come from? %u? Does an override as above change the dict

On 19.03.2018 06:40, MRob wrote: > Are the dovecot environment variables mutable? I'd like to override like: > > set "${env.vnd.dovecot.username}" "someuser at example.org" > > Or better, I prefer to override %u Dovecot variable during the userdb > lookup. > > Is either possible? > > PS, when Sieve does extdata lookups for username key, where

On 2018-03-19 06:31, Aki Tuomi wrote: > On 19.03.2018 06:40, MRob wrote: >> Are the dovecot environment variables mutable? I'd like to override >> like: >> >> set "${env.vnd.dovecot.username}" "someuser at example.org" >> >> Or better, I prefer to override %u Dovecot variable during the userdb >> lookup. >> >> Is

I've been setting custom env vars for Apache 1 of 2 ways; 1 - Changing the passwd file so Apache has a shell and loading a custom .bashrc file. 2 - Using the SetEnv directive in my httpd.conf file. I'm crazy about neither one as they both have limitations; 1 - I don't like giving Apache its own shell. 2 - The SetEnv directive only takes 2 args so if I have a var with multiple

Hello ppl. Im trying to install an aplication and for some reason ir says. "Cannot get enviorment variables" I spoke with the developer and he told me that it is because i dont have microsoft DAC installed. I installed it and the problem persists. I need to know how to see which ENV vars the software wants in order to create them. It is not a wine problem because I get the same error

SoftEther VPN Once setup, it just works.... Regards, Richard --- Richard Zimmerman Systems / Network Administrator River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc. 1111 S Main Street South Bend, IN 46601-3337 (574) 233-1133 (574) 280-7284 Fax -----Original Message----- From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of david Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:57 PM To: CentOS

On 04/04/2016 10:57 AM, david wrote: > I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan > (and probably others I haven't noted). I'd be interested in hearing > from anyone who wishes to comment about which to use, with the > following requirements: I recommend l2tp/ipsec. It's supported out of the box on a wide variety of client platforms, which

OpenVPN is the best opensource VPN for me it can connect to any connection such as airport, hotel, restaurant, resorts, malls it never let me down. And configuration is easy on those who have idea on what they want to achieve. On Tuesday, 5 April 2016, Eero Volotinen <eero.volotinen at iki.fi> wrote: > IPSec is not recommended solution nowdays. OpenVPN runs top of single udp > or tcp

How is IPSec "not recommended solution nowdays"? I tend to use IPSec for site-to-site connections i.e. the ones that run 24/7 and only require two experienced people to set up (the admins at both endpoints). For host-to-site setups I prefer OpenVPN since explaining to endusers how to set up an ipsec connection is neigh impossible whereas with OpenVPN I can simply tell them to install