similar to: Status of reserved keywords and builtins

So, to summarize, the open questions are: (1) Should as.complex(NA_character_) give complex(r=NA_real_, i=0) instead of NA_complex_? (2) Should the first argument in c(NA, x) and c(NA_integer_, x), where typeof(x) == "complex", be promoted to complex(r=NA_real_, i=0) instead of NA_complex_? My opinions: (1) No. The imaginary part of the

>>>>> Mikael Jagan >>>>> on Wed, 8 Nov 2023 11:13:18 -0500 writes: > So, to summarize, the open questions are: > (1) Should as.complex(NA_character_) give complex(r=NA_real_, i=0) > instead of NA_complex_? > (2) Should the first argument in c(NA, x) and c(NA_integer_, x), > where typeof(x) == "complex", be promoted

Hmm, it is not actually at odds with help(c), it is just that the autocoercion works different that it used to, so that as.complex(NA) == as.complex(NA_real) == NA_real_+0i) which now differs from NA_complex although both print as NA. I haven't been quite alert when this change was discussed, but it does look a bit unfortunate that usage patterns like c(NA, 0+1i) does not give complex NA

Hi all, Surprisingly (at least to me), `as.complex(NA_real_)` results in `complex(real = NA_real_, imaginary = 0)` rather than `NA_complex_`. It seems to me that this goes against the docs of `as.complex()`, which say this in the Details section: "Up to R versions 3.2.x, all forms of NA and NaN were coerced to a complex NA, i.e., the NA_complex_ constant, for which both the real and

>>>>> Michael Chirico >>>>> on Sun, 5 Nov 2023 09:41:42 -0800 writes: > This is another follow-up to the thread from September > "Recent changes to as.complex(NA_real_)". > A test in data.table was broken by the changes for NA > coercion to complex; the breakage essentially comes from > c(NA, 0+1i) > # vs

Hi, I have discovered that sample() fails with an uninformative error message when the x argument is a single NA of type double or integer. I can reproduce the problem with the following code: base::sample(NA) # NA is of logical type above base::sample(NA_character_) base::sample(NA_complex_) base::sample(NA_real_) base::sample(NA_integer_) The last two lines throw the following error: Error

Thanks Martin. My hang-up was not on what the outcome of as.complex(NA) should be, but rather, how I should read code like c(x, y) generally. Till now, I have thought of it like 'c(x, y)' is c(as(x, typeof(y)), y)` when "type(y) > type(x)". Basically in my mind, "coercion" in R <-> as.<newtype>(.) (or coerceVector() in C). So I tracked down the source

This is another follow-up to the thread from September "Recent changes to as.complex(NA_real_)". A test in data.table was broken by the changes for NA coercion to complex; the breakage essentially comes from c(NA, 0+1i) # vs c(as.complex(NA), 0+1i) The former is the output we tested against; the latter is essentially (via coerceVector() in C) what's generated by our

In R 2.8.0 on Windows (tested both under ESS and under R Console in case there was an I/O issue) There is a bug in printing val <- matrix(list(NA_complex_,NA_complex_),1). > dput(val) structure(list(NA_complex_, NA_complex_), .Dim = 1:2) > print(val) [,1] [1,] [,2] [1,] Note that a large number of spaces are printed instead of NA. Compare the unproblematic real case:

Hello, I'm trying to compile vmkit on a x86_64 linux box with gcc-4.1.2, but I'm running into troubles because of various problems with casts between pointers and integers. Is there anybody who succeeded in this task? Az I see, some of the problems can be fixed with an appropriate typedef/macro declaration, but in VMCore/JavaObject.cpp some lowlevel bitmanipulation is used, to mark

Hi Zsombor, Thanks for the patch! Unfortunately I can't apply it because the llvm API has moved from BinaryOperator::create to BinaryOperator::Create. Are you using svn head? Now on the x86_64 part. There has been very little work on porting vmkit on x86_64. If you're having compilation problems, I suppose it's in the garbage collector directory (GCMmap2). If you could make the

Dear R helpers Suppose val1 = c(10, 20, 35, 80, 12) val2 = c(3, 8, 11, 7) I want to select either val1 or val2 depending on value of third quantity val3. val3 assumes either of the values "Monthly" or "Yearly". If val3 = "Monthly", then val = val1 and if val3 = "Yearly", then val = val2. I tried the ifelse statement as ifelse(val3 =

Hello, I am trying to emulate the "stack" as like on x86 when using push/pop so afterwards I can use LLVM's optimizer passes to simplify (reduce junk) the code. The LLVM IR code: define { i32, i32, i32 } @test(i32 %foo, i32 %bar, i32 %sp) { ; push foo (On "stack") %sp_1 = sub i32 %sp, 4 %sp_1_ptr = inttoptr i32 %sp_1 to i32* store i32 %foo, i32* %sp_1_ptr, align

Hi, I'm trying to plot stacked barplot with lines on it. Here is the data. emp days val1 val2 score 1 21 1 0 1200 2 35 1 1 na 3 42 na na 3000 4 53 2 1 2100 5 64 1 0 na 6 73 na na 1400 My X-axis is days. I'm looking to plot val1,val2 as stacked bars and score as lines with different y-axis. I could get the bar plot and lines on it but the problem is the bars and lines are not aligning

What is the best way to produce a barplot from my data? I would like the barplot to show each person with the values stacked val1+val2+val3, so there is one bar for each person When I use barplot(data.matrix(realdata)), it shows one bar for each value instead. To post here, I created an artificical data set, but it works fine. fakedata <- as.data.frame(list(LETTERS[1:3])) colnames(fakedata)

Hi, I have data like this.... print(x) ID VAL1 VAL2 1 B A 2 P Q 3 T S What I would like is data like this... ID VAL1 VAL2 1 A B 2 P Q 3 S T So that VAL1 and VAL2 are alphabetically ordered. Any advice is welcome! San. [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

Thank you for the hint. I adjusted the code and it works: The code after replacing inttoptr with getelementptr: define { i32, i32, i8* } @test(i32 %foo, i32 %bar, i8* %sp) { entry: ; push foo (On "stack") %sp_1 = getelementptr i8, i8* %sp, i32 -4 %sp_1_ptr = bitcast i8* %sp_1 to i32* store i32 %foo, i32* %sp_1_ptr, align 4 ; push bar %sp_2 = getelementptr i8, i8* %sp_1,

Fairly straightforward code motion of MSR / TSC / PMC accessors to the sub-arch level. Note that rdmsr/wrmsr_safe functions are not moved; Linux relies on the fault behavior here in the event that certain MSRs are not supported on hardware, and combining this with a VMI wrapper is overly complicated. The instructions are virtualizable with trap and emulate, not on critical code paths, and only

Fairly straightforward code motion of MSR / TSC / PMC accessors to the sub-arch level. Note that rdmsr/wrmsr_safe functions are not moved; Linux relies on the fault behavior here in the event that certain MSRs are not supported on hardware, and combining this with a VMI wrapper is overly complicated. The instructions are virtualizable with trap and emulate, not on critical code paths, and only

Thanks for the answers. Although I am not sure if I've understood the docs about how inttoptr/ptrtointr are different when compared to gep. It says: "It’s invalid to take a GEP from one object, address into a different separately allocated object, and dereference it.". To go back to my intention why I am doing this, I would like to "emulate" some x86 instructions with