similar to: Delayed variable expansion for P_PATH/P_STRING is missing (loadparm.c)

Here's a second set of diffs for sanity-checking smb.conf files. This one implements a basic set of checks on netbios names. No, it won't recognize someone using an ip address, but it will realize the dots don't belong: $ testparm Load smb config files from /usr/local/samba/lib/smb.conf WARNING: netbios name "127.0.0.1" contained a dot, which is only legal in DNS domain

Hi Timo, congrats to the merger with OX. Currently the implementation of RFC 5257, ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1, has only low priority on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap I want to explain a scenario that would benefit from annotation support to - maybe - increase the priority in your roadmap: I'm currently working on a project to publish bank customer related documents inside a banking

We use rsync to provide an rsync share on a linux server with a javascript program on Windows clients which ensures all client data is backed up each morning. After making no progress with my posting last month regarding making a module upload only to prevent someone from manually downloading the rsync share obtaining other users work (exclude = * wasn't possible because we need --delete to

Hi folks, This is a patch for rsync 2.6.9 - I'm not sure if this is the proper vehicle for submitting them. It's been working great for us for months, and I hope it's seen as offering useful utility in general. Steve (who is not a subscriber to this list) --- Stephen J Friedl | Security Consultant | UNIX Wizard | +1 714 544-6561 www.unixwiz.net | Tustin, Calif. USA |

Hi, a few months ago I posted a message about using LDAP to store rsync secrets in LDAP. I received a response about patching the rsync source code with a patch file. I am now finally getting around to doing this, and when I tried to use the patch command 'patch --verbose ./rsync-2.5.6/authenticate.c rsync-ldap.patch' , it gives me the following error: Hmm... Looks like a unified diff

Hi, I'm trying to get rsync 2.5.6 to authenticate users via openldap-2.0.23. I was looking through the mailing list archives and found a patch for rsync-2.4.6 that does this for me. I was just wondering if this is still valid, or if there has been a new patch or new implementation that has superceded this patch. Any help would be great. The message I am referring to is as follows:

In the bufferbloat age, anything that can make for a kinder, gentler bulk transfer protocol seems desirable. This add support for user and server selectable congestion control algorithms. As examples: --congestion-alg=lp # For the tcp-lp algorithm on the command line Or in a subsection: [mystuff] congestion alg = westwood # for a wireless connection And diffserv support: --diffserv=8 for

I am running R version 2.15.1 in Windows XP I am having problems with a function I'm trying to create to: 1. subset a data.frame based on function arguments (colname & parmname) 2. rename the PARMVALUE column in the data.frame based on function argument (xvar) 3. generate charts plotvar <- function(parentdf,colname, parmname,xvar,yvar ){ subdf <-

I compiled and tried rsync 2.5.0 but could not get the server running. loadparm.c:string_set() now calls free() which it did not do in 2.4.6 and this free() tries to free memory that was not allocated with malloc. Here is a gdb run (done after adding return before fork() in become_daemon) which shows where it crashes and what my minimal config file for demonstrating the bug was. The config file

hi*& Samba has troubles with joining to NT PDC, that has some scope id because: 1. smbpasswd does not know anything about scope id and you haven't any chance to join into NT PDC. 2. also many utils like smbmount doesn't know scope id 3. In smbclient you can specify scope id, but you should remember it and etc. It's not so usable. I'm asked about these problems in samba

I need to buy a Sager 5125 laptop immediately and I am concerned about the Optimus setup in this model. It comes with a Nvidia 330M/Intel Hybrid. I want to use this with Fedora 13. I do not care if I can switch. I just want it to work. I can also deal with only the onboard graphics working in linux. Do you think the HDMI output will work or I will need the 330M driver for that? I see nvidia

In case others find this of value, I wrote a patch to rsync 2.5.6 to give rsync in --daemon mode the ability to run a pre-transfer and post-transfer command. These options handle our need to prepare a server to receive files and to do some processing after receiving files. The options for /etc/rsyncd.conf are pretransfer script = /some/command/to/run posttransfer script =

https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=868 Summary: Null pointer segfault in netlink code Product: nftables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Ubuntu Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: nft AssignedTo: pablo at netfilter.org ReportedBy: john at

Whereabouts would I want to put a Ruby file that extends a Rails class? Say, adding a method to ActiveRecord::Base or something along those lines. I''ve read that those classes go in /lib, but my application doesn''t seem to see the changes I''ve made. Obviously I''m missing something... Any suggestions would be appreciated! -Brasten

Samba Team, We are trying to determine if the Samba version 2.2.8 will allow for NTLM V2 authentication. Could you please update me on what version of Samba allow for NTLM V2. Thank you in advance. Sam Martinez (303 236-1834) U.S. Geological Survey

This is a patch to control unix permissions when uploading to a rsyncd-server by setting rsyncd.conf options. cu, Stefan -- Stefan Nehlsen | ParlaNet Administration | sn@parlanet.de | +49 431 988-1260 -------------- next part -------------- diff -ur rsync-2.5.5/loadparm.c rsync-2.5.5-umask/loadparm.c --- rsync-2.5.5/loadparm.c Mon Mar 25 05:04:23 2002 +++ rsync-2.5.5-umask/loadparm.c Sun Mar 2

Hi, If anyone is interested, the included patch to rsync-2.6.2 allows you to specify the port number for an rsync server as a global option in rsyncd.conf with 'port = <N>' (where <N> is your favorite port number). Note that this parameter only takes effect when the server is started, not when clients connect. Also, specifying the port in rsyncd.conf takes precedence

On 21 Mar 2015, at 10:14, Florian Sager <sager at agitos.de> wrote: > > Hi Timo, > > congrats to the merger with OX. > > Currently the implementation of RFC 5257, ANNOTATE-EXPERIMENT-1, has > only low priority on http://wiki2.dovecot.org/Roadmap > I want to explain a scenario that would benefit from annotation support > to - maybe - increase the priority in your

Hi all, in our LAN we use a Samba server (version 2.2.9) on Linux (Debian Woody) to provide file services to workstations running (mostly) W2K. WinCVS is a GUI frontend to the popular CVS version control system. After the swap to and from daylight savings time WinCVS erroneously flags all files in cvs working directories on Samba shares as modified (because of the icon color WinCVS users refer to

Hi! I am doing backups from a number of machines to an rsync server. For some time I was trying to come up with a solution, which would prevent users from peeking at each other's files, which are backed up. Finally, I've hacked rsync, introducing a new option "write only" for rsyncd.conf. When set to true, this option forbids the transfers from server to the client, thus solving