similar to: Question about Kerberos and what is the different if compile with internal heimdal or mit-krb5

My college is kerberized, and so in many situations authentication is both faster and more secure using kerberos tickets. Sadly I have run into a problem. The Heimdal included in FreeBSD seems to be incompatible with my school's servers running MIT kerberos when authenticating over gssapi. For example ssh in verbose mode returns: debug2: we sent a gssapi-with-mic packet, wait for reply

On Mon, Oct 24, 2005 at 03:35:41PM -0400, William Jojo wrote: > > Has anyone been able to get Heimdal 0.7.1 with Samba 3.0.20b to compile successfully without commenting out the __cplusplus stuff in include/includes.h? If I comment it out, it's fine on FC3. The Heimdal people are using "private" as a structure member name, so I know it's a Heimdal problem :-). I think you

Hi! I already asked a similar question before, but it keeps popping up in different contexts and forms, and the more I use samba myself, the more often it comes to me too, especially in context of using various security tokens for auth. And the more I think about all this, the more sane it looks to me. The thing is: mit-krb5 has much better user-level support than heimdal. But samba does not

I started working on a chat program but, I''m having this problem chatroom.rhtml <div id="chatroom"> </div> <%= periodically_call_remote( :update => "chatroom", :url => {:action => :chat }, :frequency => 2) %> chat.rhtml <h1><%= @chat.room %> room.</h1>

Howdie, Is there a way to get the default BSD 5.3 openssh to compile against the MIT kerberos libraries? I have set NO_KERBEROS=yes in /etc/make.conf so that the heimdal kerberos is not built, and rebuilt world, then installed /usr/ports/security/krb5 and rebuilt world again. sshd is however not being built against MIT at all. [root@foobar] ~ # ldd /usr/sbin/sshd /usr/sbin/sshd:

Hi all, I was hoping to setup a realm trust between a Samba AD domain and a kerberos realm running mit-krb5, however it looks like that isn't currently supported. Is that correct, or am I missing something (I'm running Samba 4.9.4)? Having noticed that "samba-tool domain trust" only seems to cater for trusts involving other AD domains, I tried to workaround that (in the

On Mon, 2023-03-20 at 10:39 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy wrote: > Indeed. For the record, current set of tests not supported by > > --with-system-mitkrb5 build: > > > > ---------------------------------------- > > $ cat selftest/skip_mit_kdc > > # We do not support RODC yet > > .*rodc > > .*RODC > > ^samba4.ntvfs.cifs.ntlm.base.unlink >

I have a freshly installed FreeBSD 6.0-BETA1 system, which comes with Heimdal & OpenSSH w/GSSAPI enabled (version 4.1p1 FreeBSD-20050605) Most of the servers I connect to have OpenSSH w/GSSAPI enabled but they use MIT Kerberos (1,3.x and 1.4.x) Now, I can use ticket authentication between all systems where the libraries are all the same (Heimdal or MIT), but trying to use, for example,

On Sun, 2023-03-19 at 09:29 +0200, Alexander Bokovoy via samba- technical wrote: > Hi, > > > I would be against a blended build against both MIT Kerberos and > Heimdal > Kerberos in a distribution. It is not going to bring you anything > good, > support wise. > > Andreas and I have submitted a talk to SambaXP about MIT > Kerberos/Heimdal Kerberos-based Samba AD

I have some problem whit Kerberos. OS: FreeBSD 5.3 Domain: W2k3 native mode. 1)I am Installing Heimdal 0.6.1 over port. Config /etc/krb5.conf %/usr/local/bin/kinit ivan ivan@NKMK.RU's Password: kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP 2)Compile and install Heimdal 0.6.4 over source %/usr/local/bin/kinit ivan ivan@NKMK.RU's Password: kinit:

What is the difference between Heimdal and MIT as far usability goes? MIT seems to be the default on major linux distrobutions, but I here a lot about people preferring Heimdal, but I can't find any reasons why. Is one generally more stable/faster/reliable than the other? There is already a blank wiki page at http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_%26_Kerberos so if anyone has any good

Hi there I'm still going round in circles trying to get winbindd authentication against a 2003 server working. I have what appears to be the same problem as: http://www.ssite.org/articles/view.aspx?class=2&articleid=2 There's something wrong with the SMB Packet signing on this machine. In parallel, I succcessfully built and have got working samba-devel on FreeBSD 5.1 against the

Has anyone been able to get the Lace (ajax chatroom) ported over to Ruby for a Ruby on Rails implemention? (The current version is PHP-based) ... or is there a ROR-chatroom distribution that exists? Thanks! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.

I use ubuntu 9.04 + wine latest version. after I install camfrog by wine. then I try to run it. I can IM with person, but I can't enter to chatroom. After I try to enter into chatroom, program is close. [Exclamation] [Exclamation]

samba-3.0.21c, heimdal-0.7.2 The heimdal documentation[1] talks about a samba integration when both samba and heimdal are using ldap as their backends. I quote: "Now you can proceed as in See Using LDAP to store the database. Heimdal will pick up the Samba LDAP entries if they are in the same search space as the Kerberos entries." There is absolutely no further documentation. I tried

Hi, thank you for your answer :) ohhh that is new I thought that samba 4 was to this day incompatible with a schema update >= v67 (it is I think somewhere it is written in the documentation that the reason why windows > 2016 can't be used as domain controller is partly due to the schema that is what bothered me)) I already have set up an ADFS (win 2016) (works with heimdal krb

Hi, I'm running OpenSSH 3.8 & 3.9, compiled against Heimdal 0.6.3 for it's GSSAPI & AFS integration. A couple weeks ago, we upgraded our MIT KDC from (ugh) Kerberos 5 1.0.6 to the lastest and greatest 1.3.5. However, it seems that as part of the upgrade, our GSSAPI credentials passing in OpenSSH stopped working. Actually, didn't completely stop... You can still do a

I have previously gotten samba 3.0.4 to work with the MIT implementation, now with 3.0.7, the configure is looking for -lgssapi and not finding it. I can get the AD to issue me a kerberos ticket, samba is just complaining about not geing able to find the gssapi library. Does anyone have a tried-and-true approach using the ports system? Thanks, Graham

Hi Louis, Thanks for your message. However, I already have NFS working completely. I'm only trying to work out root NFS access on the client.? I tried your NFS translation fix via idmapd.conf? but that isn't working for me. I've discovered that's because CentOS 7 is using gssproxy so apparently your fix won't work. The fix from Red Hat (adding some lines to krb.conf seen in my

Hi everyone, I've done a lot of reading on this issue over the last couple of days I had a "Red Hat Linux release 9 (Shrike)" box running 3.0.3a and the stock redhat krb5 package and it was authenticating against a w2k AD domain (over which I have very little control save for my little OU). things were working ok, but I wanted to update it to the new bug fixed versions.