Displaying 20 results from an estimated 600 matches similar to: "LDAPcmp show errors (serverState, subRefs)"
2014 Dec 10
1
Samba 4.1.7 ldapcmp msDS-NcType Error comparing DCs
Dear all,
Running samba-tool ldapcmp on my both DCs samba 4.1.7 leads to the output
:
Attributes found only in ldap://s4master:
msDS-NcType
serverState
FAILED
How to deal with this?
I am missing something?
[root at s4slave ~]# samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://s4master ldap://s4slave
-Uadministrator domain
Password for [TPLK\administrator]:
* Comparing [DOMAIN]
2015 Jul 16
3
4.2.2 as AD with 2 DCs: database incoherency
On my site with samba 4.18 on centos 6:
'samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://DC1 ldap://DC2 -Uadministrator' failed with this result msDS-NC Type failed :
[root at s4master ~]# samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://s4master ldap://s4slave -Uadministrator
Password for [TPLK\administrator]:
* Comparing [DOMAIN] context...
* Objects to be compared: 606
Comparing:
'CN=Builtin,DC=tplk,DC=loc'
2016 Jan 14
1
Samab DC's not syncing
Hi,
I am running a Windows Domain based on 2 Samba AD servers. The setup is
running mostly fine but I have the impression that the 2 DC's are not
syncing their information. For instance:
- I added a Windows pc to the domain last week, when I started 'Active
directory users and computers' today on a windows pc I could not see that
pc, after rebooting one of the DC's the pc
2015 Jul 16
2
4.2.2 as AD with 2 DCs: database incoherency
Here I obtained:
---------------------
* Comparing [DOMAIN] context...
Failed search of base=DC=ad,DC=domain,DC=tld
ERROR(ldb): uncaught exception - LDAP client internal error:
NT_STATUS_UNEXPECTED_NETWORK_ERROR
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/samba/netcmd/__init__.py", line
175, in _run
return self.run(*args, **kwargs)
File
2016 Jun 28
6
unique index violation on objectSid
27.06.2016 18:45, mathias dufresne:
> Perhaps you don't have yet duplicate objectSid as that's not supposed to be
> possible.
> Rather than scripting something to look for objectSid used twice I would
> start with dbcheck and other tools to verify that your database is
> consistent and identical on all servers.
[root at pdc ~]# samba-tool dbcheck
Checking 3346 objects
2019 Apr 19
1
joined computer not appear in all DCs (DC4 not sync with DC3)
Hello,
I had posted this in another topic, but because the problem is different, I
decided to create a new topic.
Conf:
- Primary DC/pdc Emulator as DC3
- Second DC as DC4
After an upgrade from schema 45 to 69 in DCs, when adding a computer in the
domain and if the domain to respond is DC4 the synchronization for DC3 is
not done.
I already did several tests that I already knew and also new
2016 Nov 21
2
group policy update fails
Hai,
Since your getting.
finddcs: No matching server found
> ERROR: Invalid IP address '3(NXDOMAIN)'!
There is something wrong in the base of you setup.
Check all DC's for ipnumbers (A) and PTR records.
Dont forget to create the reverse zone yourself.
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Troubleshooting
2016 Nov 18
2
group policy update fails
Ok just to verify.
DC name=
ad41.dc.samges.ru
dnsdomain= dc.samges.ru
Kerberos domain ??
Im guessing you kerberos to dnsdomain mapping is wrong.
Can you post the
/etc/hosts
/etc/resolv.conf
/etc/krb5.conf
And, can you post this line u used for provisioning?
Greetz,
Louis
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: Mike Lykov [mailto:combr at samges.ru]
> Verzonden:
2012 Sep 12
2
ldapcmp failling
Hello,
I have three DC's in an environment, and ldapcmp is failing. How can I figure out either what went wrong, or how to resolve the issue so that the databases are truly in sync?
* Comparing [DOMAIN] context...
* Objects to be compared: 2277
Comparing:
'CN=Builtin,DC=ad,DC=domain,DC=com' [ldap://192.168.10.81]
'CN=Builtin,DC=ad,DC=domain,DC=com'
2016 Jan 18
4
Samba DC sync issues - help
Help, my Samba DC's refuse to sync :-(
I have 2 Samba 4.1.17 DC servers. I made some changes via Active Directory
USer and Computers on Windows. However even after a weekend the changes do
not appear on the second DC.
If I run
samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://dc1 ldap://dc2 -Uadministrator
--filter=msDS-NcType,serverState,subrefs
I see:
2015 Jul 16
0
4.2.2 as AD with 2 DCs: database incoherency
On 16/07/15 07:19, Daniel Müller wrote:
> On my site with samba 4.18 on centos 6:
>
> 'samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://DC1 ldap://DC2 -Uadministrator' failed with this result msDS-NC Type failed :
>
> [root at s4master ~]# samba-tool ldapcmp ldap://s4master ldap://s4slave -Uadministrator
> Password for [TPLK\administrator]:
>
> * Comparing [DOMAIN] context...
>
2016 Oct 12
3
Dragon egg not recognizing Target ARM machine
Hello Team,
Good Morning!!
This is Vishnu Prasanth doing my master's thesis on improving llvm compiler
optimization.
Currently I am trying to build dragon egg and when I gave take, it is not
getting recognized for ARM machine.
Can you please help me with.
Below are the errors when I gave the below command inside dragon egg
directory
GCC=GCC_DIR/gcc
2016 Jun 27
2
unique index violation on objectSid
Hi all!
Today, after two years of production, I get this error:
samba-tool user create test20160627 testpassword
ERROR(ldb): Failed to add user 'test20160627': -
../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1216: Failed to re-index objectSid in
CN=test20160627,CN=Users,DC=ad... - ../lib/ldb/ldb_tdb/ldb_index.c:1148:
unique index violation on objectSid in CN=test20160627,CN=Users,DC=ad...
Help me
2007 Jul 16
4
No adsl in dom0 - Fedora 7
Hi,
I am having problems establishing an adsl connection in dom0 (but ONLY
in dom0, without xen everything is ok). Following is my setup/situation:
1. Installed clean Fedora 7 (with virtualization option selected)
2. Booted with the non-xen kernel & setup adsl. Adsl connection works
without any problems.
3. Rebooted with xen kernel into dom0.
4. adsl connection can no longer be activated
2015 Jul 15
2
4.2.2 as AD with 2 DCs: database incoherency
Hi all,
I'm having a test AD domain composed with 2 DC, using Sernet's version of
Samba 4.2.2.
These two DC are Centos 6.6 (dc20) and Debian 7.8 (dc00).
These two are using TDB as a backend (as we have no other choice at this
stage of Samba's development).
*dc20*:~# ldbsearch -H $sam '(objectclass=group)' dn | tail -3
# returned 27392 records
# *27389* entries
# 3 referrals
2023 Mar 22
2
Error: /proc/self/status is larger than expected
Hello,
gaia ~ # uname -a
Linux gaia 6.1.12-gentoo-x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Mar 9 19:57:24 CST 2023 x86_64 Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3470S CPU @ 2.90GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
gaia ~ # dovecot --version
2.3.20 (80a5ac675d)
gaia ~ # cat /proc/self/status | wc --bytes
See attached for example content of /proc/self/status and the dovecot.conf through 'dovecot -n'
I am re-sending this message because
2016 Jun 28
0
unique index violation on objectSid
I'm understand, why I get error about unique index violation on objectSid:
samba-tool fsmo show
RidAllocationMasterRole owner: CN=NTDS
Settings,CN=PDC,CN=Servers,CN=Default-First-Site-Name,CN=Sites,CN=Configuration,DC=ad,...
Last created object have objectSid
S-1-5-21-763247336-2482037999-3416227170-2001 (it is record for computer)
Last symbols is 2001, and last assigned RID is 2001:
[root
2023 Mar 26
1
Error: /proc/self/status is larger than expected
Hi!
This requires a code change, which is currently in progress. It does require you to patch Dovecot yourself if you want to use it, once it's ready.
Aki
> On 26/03/2023 05:22 EEST Elisamuel Resto Donate <sam at samresto.dev> wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
> At this point I have resorted to add the error message to be ignored by the syslog daemon to at least keep it out of
2023 Mar 26
1
Error: /proc/self/status is larger than expected
Aki,
Thank you!
Regards,
-Sam
> On Mar 26, 2023, at 04:00, Aki Tuomi <aki.tuomi at open-xchange.com> wrote:
>
> ?Hi!
>
> This requires a code change, which is currently in progress. It does require you to patch Dovecot yourself if you want to use it, once it's ready.
>
> Aki
>
>> On 26/03/2023 05:22 EEST Elisamuel Resto Donate <sam at
2023 Mar 21
4
Error: /proc/self/status is larger than expected
Hello,
Writing to get some insight as to how I might rid myself of a the pesky
error message on the subject. Every binary throws out that error, every
LMTP delivery... basically every time any dovecot binary is executed. I
am unsure if this is configuration related or not, but intuition says it
is an issue with a kernel feature or compiler issue.
I saw the error message in the source code