similar to: Multiple ISP + traffic shapping = poor download speed

Hi, I am migrating from one ISP to another, and would like to run both simultaneously for a while. So: (both netmask 255.255.255.248) [ISP1] 24.106.62.180 [ISP2] 209.181.237.230 | | | | \ / -----[ HUB ]----- | | -------- eth0 --------- | Linux FW/Server | ---------eth1 --------- | | [ HUB ] | 10.0.0.x/255.255.255.0 The default IP on

Hello,I have single linux router ( fedora core 1 ), 2 ISP, 1 internal network,1 IP space from every ISP My scenario: eth0 1.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 1 eth1 2.0.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 -> ISP 2 eth2 1.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP1 eth3 2.0.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 -> IP space from ISP2 Config I try: /etc/iproute2/rt_tables: 10 isp1 20 isp2 ip

Hello everybody: Here is my "network layout": ISP1 ISP2 | | | | +-----eth0---------eth1------+ | | | FC 3 box | | | +-----eth2---------eth3------+ |

I need to route: from 196.33.50.0/25 (default route) to ISP1 from 196.33.248.0/24 (default route) to ISP2 ISP1 --------- fire --+---- 196.33.248.0/24 / | ISP2 --------/ +---- router ----- router ----- 196.33.50.0/25 What I''ve done: Default route via ISP1 created routing table ISP2 for default route via ISP2 I would like to do the following but they get

Hi, At office, we have I ISPs. I want to lightly monitor each link latency in order to decide several routing. For that, I have only one external server: 1 IP, it's an OVH dedicated server. The quick picture is http://s24.postimg.org/n3436z64l/defaul_route.png Default route is via ISP1. If OVH-server pings IP1: - the request will go through ISP1: it's OK - the reply will go through

Hi there. Currently, our network design has two ISP lines and 3 subnets for LAN. Below are some details :- eth0 - isp1 eth1 - isp2 eth2 - subnet1 eth3 - subnet2 eth4 - subnet3 What i wanted to do is to assign incoming port 80 to our local squid server running on the firewall itself and assigned it to eth0(ISP1). I think it shouldnt be a problem as /etc/shorewall/rules provides a sample of the

I set up this config: +------+ -+ ISP1 +--+ +------+ | +-------+ +--+ linux | +------+ | +-------+ -+ ISP2 +--+ +------+ No problem. Standard setup with two ISP''s. Both routed subnets. Default gateway is ISP1. No magic here. Now I put a server behind the Linux box. I want the server to be reachable on an /extra/ IP in the routed subnet of ISP2. +------+ -+ ISP1

hello, i have 2 links to the ISP of 128kbit each, and i want to balance the trafic between them, but not staticly (local ip1-5 throw isp1, and the rest to isp2). I though at a ingress clasification, then routing by the mark, and at the exit nat (yes i must do nat :(((, but the clasification must be flow based, and i dont know how to do it. C _______________________________________________ LARTC

I''ve just started to recently look at CBQ and HTB, but I''ve been wondering whether or not something like the following is possible: I''ve got two external links: +--+ | |-----ISP1 |FW| | |-----ISP2 +--+ One link has a bandwidth cap, and the other doesn''t. What I want to do is, punt all outbound traffic out via ISP1

Hi, I want to configure QoS in my shorewall conf but I have a doubt. Now I am using tcrules with prerouting and with the file providers, like this. 2:P 192.168.0.11 0.0.0.0/0 tcp 25 So, with this way I route my smtp traffic with my provider number 2. Well, now I want to configure QoS with tcclasses and tcdevices, but if I do that I need to use the MARK in the tcclasses So, how

Dear list, Shorewall is running here with 2 ISP''s: ISP1: corporate ADSL-line with fixed set of IP''s ISP2: fast consumer-grade cable-connection with higher bandwidth All our main traffic (web, e-mail) is routed trough ISP1. Only for special purposes (frequent large ftp-transfers) ISP2 is used, configured trough tcrules. ISP2 is not so reliable as ISP1 (duh) and they sometimes

0 *H 010 +0 *H $Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi ALL, I''m new to TC and IPTABLES and i need help in setting up a filter/routing solution to an ISP. I''ve read all the HOWTOs and i''ve reading LARTC messages for a month now. I still don''t have a clue on how to do it ''cause sometimes people say

Hi, is it possible to have 2 different ISP in one server? i have 2 NIC cards im going to config ISP1 in NIC1 and ISP2 in NIC2? what should be the configuration for this setup? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20070412/4c62019f/attachment-0004.html>

Hi, I have a simple question. I have my firewall with 2 external Ip and 1 lan. For example ISP1 FW LAN----Mail Server ISP2 Ok, when i DANT the smpt port to my mail server, I can see that the conection in my mail server comes from the external IP of my ISP. I need to change this so the conection to my mail server cames from the LAN IP from my firewall Is this possible?

Hello! I have set up a LINUX router with two seperate uplinks to do load balancing. I made all the configuration after the "NANO-HOWTO to use more than one independent Internet connection" document. I patched my 2.4.24 kernel with patches, described in this document. My configuration is: --------------------------------------------------------------- #!/bin/bash

Hi all, I have managed to setup a Fedora 7 box with 3 ethernet cards and two ADSL modem/routers from different suppliers as LARTC recommends. I am able to direct traffic for specific internal IPs either to one or the other ADSL line. However, I am faced with two problems I am struggling for the solution: 1. I have opened a few ports on the ADSL router/firewalls to talk to internal hosts; say when

Dear all Lartc, I try to split my Internet access to my 2 ISP with 1 linux (GNU/Debian sarge) 3 NIC router, I want all my users conneted with ISP1 and just some IP connected with ISP2 Here is my configuration: Internal network: 10.117.71.0/24 Interface eth0 ISP1: IP for my linux box: 1.2.3.4/29 Interface: eth1 Gateway: 1.2.3.5 ISP2: IP for my

Hi; I have two dsl lines, which the low bandwidth connection(ISP2) is only used for failover. My setup is showed below; \ ISP1 \ / \ ____/NAT My internal net |-----|___| / \NAT / \ / ISP2 However, my interfaces which these lines are connected are both

Here''s my situation: I''ve got an Intel machine running a 2.6.9 linux kernel and this box has 4 modems attached to it via a usb to serial port expander. In order to force data down each of the modems, some pretty simple rules are used and they are as follows: iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport $PORT1 -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t mangle -A OUTPUT -p tcp --dport

Yes, this is a dumb question. I haven''t the time nor the resources to dig into the guts of this right now, so perhaps someone will take a few minutes to help, please. I just implemented a classic "nano" multipath setup. The script is at http://yesican.chsoft.biz/lartc/rc.nano1 What I need to know is if I need SNAT in the firewall when a packet comes in on the