similar to: lastes sources don't include "drop_cache" option

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9560 Summary: drop-cache option Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: colundrum at gmail.com QAContact: rsync-qa at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7004 Summary: Use posix_fadvise to free cached file contents when done Product: rsync Version: 3.0.6 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: ted at

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10322 Summary: Slow Performance over Network rsync Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: Joerg.Grube at Gmx.De

Linda Walsh <flac at tlinx.org> wrote: ... > That brings up another question then... What is 'hi' (v. low?)... Zero, or close to zero, is low. 12 is high. ... > What's a subset stream? This is explained at: http://flac.sourceforge.net/format.html in the bulleted point beginning, "FLAC specifies a subset of itself as the Subset format." ... > Another

Emmanuel Florac via samba wrote: > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate users" > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate users" > Unknown parameter encountered: "winbind enumerate groups" > Ignoring unknown parameter "winbind enumerate groups" It may be irrelevant, but I have: winbind enum groups = Yes winbind enum users

Emmanuel Florac wrote: > id TESTAD\\testuser > returns "no such user" and > > getent passwd TESTAD\\testuser > > returns a "2" code. > ---- On linux, to get 'domain\user' to resolve, I had to have those entries in my /etc/passwd (and /etc/group for groups). I.e. *w/o krb*, (in samba 3.x), I had entries like:

The big problem that I have with non-directio is that buffering delays program execution. When reading/writing files that are many times larger than RAM without directio, it is very apparent that system response drops through the floor- it can take several minutes for an ssh login to prompt for a password. This is true both for UFS and ZFS. Repeat the exercise with directio on UFS and there is no

I realized in looking at my smb.conf, I'm not using these in a consistent manner, and .... well I just don't understand what the differences are between them. Sure I can read the smb.conf page: %U session username (the username that the client wanted, not necessarily the same as the one they got). vs. %u username of the current service, if any. ---

Hi list, Recently I was debugging L2 guest slow booting issue in nested virtualization environment (both L0 and L1 hypervisors are all Xen). To boot a L2 Linux guest (RHEL6u2), it will need to wait more than 3 minutes after grub loaded, I did some profile, and see guest is doing disk operations by int13 BIOS procedure. Even not consider the nested case, I saw there is a bug reporting normal VM

Hi We are building a Linux app under Centos 5.3, using gnu make 3.81 and gcc 4.12. The working directory is on a remote machine and is either a Samba share or a Windows 7 share. We find that in the case of a Windows 7 share the resulting executable has the sticky bit set in group: On Windows 7 share: -rwxrwSrwx 1 <snip> myapp On Samba share: -rwxrwx--x+ 1 <snip> myapp The

2011/10/26 Sage Weil <sage@newdream.net>: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2011, Christian Brunner wrote: >> >> > Christian, have you tweaked those settings in your ceph.conf?  It would be >> >> > something like ''journal dio = false''.  If not, can you verify that >> >> > directio shows true when the journal is initialized from your osd log?

Being able to programmatically force nbdkit to be less parallel can be useful during testing. I was less sure about patch 3, but if you like it, I'm inclined to instead squash it into patch 1. This patch is written to apply after my NBD_CMD_CACHE work (since I touched the nocache filter); but can be rearranged if we think this series should go in first while that one undergoes any adjustments

I'm trying to find out what's causing this slowdown -- it's INTOLERABLE.... over 1 minute and less than 1% done. (400MB file)... After trying 3 times, I gave up and logged in using X to the server and ran Tbird from there.... Mail sent out in < 1 minute, though the copy to dovecot took about 50% longer. So... I looked at the network trace. and everyfrackin' body was

Familiar? protocol error on a local file copy? How can I have a proto incompat when it it is talking to itself?... This was on the ERROUT... rsync: writefd_unbuffered failed to write 4 bytes to socket [sender]: Broken pipe (32) File-list index 531530 not in 531937 - 533437 (finish_hard_link) [generator] rsync error: protocol incompatibility (code 2) at rsync.c(652) [generator=3.0.9] rsync:

Since v1: - rework .can_cache to be tri-state, with default of no advertisement (ripple effect through other patches) - add a lot more patches in order to round out filter support And in the meantime, Rich pushed NBD_CMD_CACHE support into libnbd, so in theory we now have a way to test cache commands through the entire stack. Eric Blake (24): server: Internal hooks for implementing

The following script is used as a first attempt to discover IO patterns in a dbase setup: #------------------------------------------------------------------ #pragma D option dynvarsize=128m dtrace:::BEGIN { } pid$target::kaio:entry { self->doit = 1; } pid$target::_aiodone:return { self->doit = 0; } io:::start /self->doit || execname == "oracle"/ {

Yves Goergen wrote: > The issue still exists. Can anybody explain to me why dovecot creates > IMAP folders with the wrong filesystem permissions? On a lark, I looked through my dirs @ permissions. Shorted lines a bit so they'd fit w/o extra lines between them using: (get rid of text before permissions, and shorten user/group to a few letter) find . -type d -ls|sed -r

This is my still-working-on-it code for btrfs directIO read. I''m posting it so people can see the progress being made on the project and can take an early shot at telling me this is just a bad idea and I''m crazy if they want to, or point out where I made some stupid mistake with btrfs core functions. The code is not complete and *NOT* ready for review or testing. I looked at

On Monday 20 October 2008 16:14, Chris Lattner wrote: > It would be nice if you could share the artificial testcase, e.g. by > attaching it to a bugzilla. Feh. The file you are trying to attach is 1195 kilobytes (KB) in size. Non-patch attachments cannot be more than 1000 KB. We recommend that you store your attachment elsewhere on the web, and then insert the URL to it in a

On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 05:29:24PM +0300, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 5:07 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > > These ones? > > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libguestfs/2020-August/msg00078.html > > No, we had a bug when copying image from glance caused sanlock timeouts > because of the unpredictable page cache flushes. > > We