similar to: Testing for the Xen Project

RFC v2 of this series This series implements a basic test job for OVMF guest. The test case will install an OVMF guest and try to boot it. It is also possible to derive a debian HVM installation test case from ts-ovmf-debian-install - the only difference should be the BIOS option. I tested running the test script without specifying BIOS, it worked fine. I just didn''t figure out a

Hi Ian-s, Two small patches for OSSTest. The first one turns on compiling the Linux modules for MegaRAID SAS, needed for the ultralisk machine in the Cambridge lab. The second adds an entry in the README file about the RebootTimeExtra host property, which I also needed to use for ulttralisk, as scrubbing 368GB of RAM really takes a lot! git://xenbits.xen.org/people/dariof/osstest.git misc Let

This took me a while to post, but given that we are not starting 4.4 just yet, this may be appropriate now. I may have misrepresented some stuff as it has been 4 weeks since I wrote these. Cheers Lars = Purpose of Roadmap = * Set a vision for interesting features * Track items * Help consumers of Xen with their planning = Release Models that work well = There was a brief discussion on two

Do you have anything detailing what the goal of each phase in Xenrt is? Phases 4 and 5 seem to be pretty much identical. Thanks, Paul Larson _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

flight 22184 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22184/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 7 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 22106 test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 9 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 22106 Regressions which are regarded as

flight 8803 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/8803/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking: test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 8769 test-amd64-i386-xl 4 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 8769 test-amd64-i386-pair 6 xen-install/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 8769

This information will be mirrored on the Xen 4.4 Roadmap wiki page: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Xen_Roadmap/4.4 We''re nearly to the completion of the code freeze, scheduled for tomorrow. After the code freeze, only bug fixes and features marked as "blockers" will be considered. At the moment, the only feature considered a blocker is experimental PVH dom0 support. In early RCs,

9d1fd58ff602 was bogous in not letting a new domain being created if its scheduling parameters --when running under the sedf scheduler-- were not fully specified, making creation fail like in this example here below: 2012-06-16 07:37:47 Z executing ssh ... root@10.80.248.105 xl create /etc/xen/debian.guest.osstest.cfg libxl: error: libxl.c:3619:sched_sedf_domain_set: setting domain sched sedf:

Aiming at a release some time in August, I''d like to cut RC1-s by Thursday next week (as I''ll be on a two week vacation starting Friday). Please indicate any bug fixes that so far may have been missed in the backports already done. A few fixes are currently stuck in master''s staging branch (or pending to make it there) - these don''t need to be named explicitly,

flight 13439 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13439/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-i386-i386-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 9 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 13379 test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 9 guest-localmigrate fail REGR. vs. 13376 Regressions which are regarded as

The marilith boxes use a conserver (http://www.conserver.com/) setup for serial access. Our installation exports the logs via http allowing us to grab them with wget. Sending debug keys with is handled separately via xenuse. xenuse ultimately speaks to the conserver too but it abstracts away the IP and port to use so this is preferred. With these changes the correct Serial hostprop for a

flight 13383 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/13383/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-pair 16 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 13379 Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 12

Fixes things on i386 for branches which no longer build an i386 hypervisor. --- Osstest/TestSupport.pm | 8 ++++++-- ts-xen-build | 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/Osstest/TestSupport.pm b/Osstest/TestSupport.pm index 1ac4cf7..d2e29d0 100644 --- a/Osstest/TestSupport.pm +++ b/Osstest/TestSupport.pm @@ -846,6 +846,7 @@ sub get_stashed ($$) {

I''ve been working on this on the odd occasion, I think it mostly works, or it did last I tried which was a while back. I''m sure it is too hacky in places. My plan was to clean it up on the next test day. I''m mostly just sending this for Wei''s benefit since he is independently looking at adding Debian HVM guest tests for OVMF purposes. Ian. commit

Hi all, These days I installed xen 4.3 unstable from source and recompiled qemu upstream with spice support. After xl create , the windows domU started successfully and spice client can visit the VDI. However, it display blue screen before entering the windows welcome screen. Is it a bug in current upstream qemu support? My domU configuration file is: builder =

Wednesday, October 9, 2013, 2:00:02 PM, you wrote: > create ^ > title it xen_platform_pci=0 doesn''t work with qemu-xen > owner it Anthony Perard <anthony.perard@citrix.com> > thanks Perhaps in general looking at the libxl and xend .. and .. qemu-xen and qemu-xen-traditonal compatibility shoud be added too. Perhaps i''m a bit blunt .. but for users

Hi, I seem to remember that there used to be ISO downloads of Xen available, for people wanting to give it an easy way for a test drive, and to submit (automated) feedback on which machines and configurations Xen ran (in)correctly. However, I do not seem to be able to find these ISO images for download at Xen.org anymore. Has the project stopped making these useful test images - and if so, why ?

Hi, I seem to remember that there used to be ISO downloads of Xen available, for people wanting to give it an easy way for a test drive, and to submit (automated) feedback on which machines and configurations Xen ran (in)correctly. However, I do not seem to be able to find these ISO images for download at Xen.org anymore. Has the project stopped making these useful test images - and if so, why ?

flight 22043 xen-unstable real [real] http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/22043/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 22033 build-armhf 4 xen-build fail REGR. vs. 22033 test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1

branch xen-unstable xen branch xen-unstable job build-i386 test xen-build Tree: qemuu git://xenbits.xen.org/staging/qemu-upstream-unstable.git Tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git *** Found and reproduced problem changeset *** Bug is in tree: xen git://xenbits.xen.org/xen.git Bug introduced: ae763e4224304983a1cde2fbb3d6e0c4d60b2688 Bug not present: