similar to: proxy_maybe & director incompatibility

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "proxy_maybe & director incompatibility"

2012 Mar 15
3
v2.1.2 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz.sig There are a ton of proxying related improvements in this release. You should now be able to do pretty much anything you want with Dovecot proxy/director. This release also includes the initial version of dsync-based replication. I'm already successfully using it for @dovecot.fi
2012 Mar 15
3
v2.1.2 released
http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz http://dovecot.org/releases/2.1/dovecot-2.1.2.tar.gz.sig There are a ton of proxying related improvements in this release. You should now be able to do pretty much anything you want with Dovecot proxy/director. This release also includes the initial version of dsync-based replication. I'm already successfully using it for @dovecot.fi
2008 Nov 19
2
CRAM-MD5 and proxy_maybe
When using proxy_maybe CRAM-MD5 authentication fails when the connection is proxied. Is this expected behavior? Is proxy_maybe too simplified for this case? We're using SQL so I could rewrite the query with IFs to fake proxy_maybe and return the password as NULL and nologin as Y, but if it works that way couldn't it work with proxy_maybe? This works: password_query = \ SELECT NULL AS
2013 Feb 19
3
Dovecot 2.2. proxy_maybe and twice SSL connections
Hello. 1. I have two identically hosts 2. I have set up replication between two hosts 3. I have 'Y' AS proxy_maybe in password_query. 4. password_query returns one of this one hosts 5. I set this parameters in dovecot config: disable_plaintext_auth = yes ssl = yes auth_mechanisms = plain login for enforce use encrypted connections by client programs.
2012 Feb 25
1
Proxying improvements in v2.1.2
I just committed a couple of features that will make life easier for some types of proxying setups: 1. IMAP proxying has already for a while supported sending local/remote IP/port to backend server, which can use it for logging and other purposes. I've now implemented this for POP3 as well, although only the remote IP/port is forwarded, not local IP/port. I implemented this also for LMTP in
2011 Dec 29
1
Trouble with proxy_maybe and auth_default_realm
Hello, I'm using proxy_maybe and auth_default_realm. It seems that when a user logs in without the domain name, relying on auth_default_realm, and the "host" field points to the local server, I get the Proxying loops to itself error. It does work as expected - log on to the local server without proxying, if the user does include the domain name in the login. (IP's and
2010 Feb 01
1
proxy_maybe regex
Does anyone know if dovecot support regex lookups for proxy/proxy_maybe, rather than mysql/ldap etc? I've been comparing it with perdition to see which one might be better for us to do layer7 username switching. Perdition supports the ability to not have any auth/db looks, but rather just a regex file that parses the usernames as they come in and forwards to the particular machine on the
2011 Mar 25
1
Ignored proxy_maybe var and no local login when "host = Proxy FQDN"
Hi help is preciated, PROBLEM The dovecot-ldap.conf of "proxy server A" is working when the "host" attribute is the FQDN of other server: pass_attrs = uid=user,userPassword={SSHA}password,\ =proxy_maybe=,maildrop=host,=port=143,=destuser=%u,=starttls=any-cert pass_filter = (&(objectClass=posixAccount)(uid=%u)) CASES When the "host" attribute is the
2008 Nov 26
3
Dovecot Proxy with MySQL auth
We are looking at deploying several pop/imap servers to house the mail for 15,000 or more mailbox accounts. We are contemplating on the design and are looking at using MySQL auth (we already have a MySQL environment in place for our user auth to live) and proxy_maybe so each server can proxy for all the others and we just have a network load balancer distribute the incoming connections to all of
2010 Jul 07
2
dovecot director service
hi, we are using the dovecot-rc1 version, and we are testing the director service, as there is little documentation on this service, a pair of questions.. if i'm not wrong, the proxy_maybe it's not implemented, yet? will be soon? this limitation does not allow use the same two directors servers like mail backend servers? the fairlure of one director server it's automatically
2008 Aug 11
1
proxy_maybe and IPv6
Hi, Using dovecot 1.1.2 on a dual-stack server, with the 'proxy_maybe' attribute to forward some clients to another server, it seems that only clients connecting with the same protocol version as the one used by address in the 'host' attribute in the password db are recognized as local. If an IPv4 address is specified as 'host', a dovecot proxy is created for clients
2020 Sep 28
1
custom userdb server, Exim, and proxying
Hi all, We have Exim using Dovecot for authentication. Dovecot, in turn, consults a custom internal server that answers Dovecot?s userdb queries. When IMAP connections arrive, for some users we want to forward those connections--without authentication--to an external IMAP server. For these users, we return ?proxy_maybe? and ?nopassword? in the authn response from our userdb server. This tells
2008 Jan 27
3
proxy configuration
Before I spend some time experimenting with what might be impossible, maybe someone can just tell me (either "how" or that it's impossible). I'd like to get perdition out of my environment (mainly to have one less moving part in my architecture). I'm looking at dovecot's built-in proxying. In my setup, I don't have dedicated front-end machines. A user can connect
2014 May 22
0
director with same director / backend servers
I know this has been covered somewhat, but I'm still not totally clear. I'm trying to setup a 3 node cluster with 3 directors and 3 backend systems. This post (from 2012) suggests that proxy_maybe should work with director: http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-December/069806.html However, these two posts (from 2013) seem to say that it will not:
2008 Jan 22
4
1.1beta14 cache bug ?
Helo all, After enable auth_cache_size = 20480 and auth_cache_ttl = 0, dovecot stops working for users that are in cache. See the log bellow: 1 - POP3 session OK jan 22 14:02:59 mailserver--03 dovecot: auth(default): client in: AUTH 1 PLAIN service=pop3 lip=10.0.149.3 rip=10.0.2.2 resp=<hidden> Jan 22 14:02:59 mailserver--03 dovecot: auth(default): cache(teste2 at
2019 Dec 11
2
Submission config being ignored
I'm having trouble setting up submission with Dovecot proxy. The submission config seems to be getting ignored, but I'm probably doing something wrong. Expected behaviour: have messages sent to submission ports (25, 465) relayed to `submission_relay_host`. -- root at imapproxy1:~# cat /etc/dovecot/conf.d/20-submission.conf submission_logout_format = in=%i out=%o submission_relay_host =
2015 Nov 04
0
ldap and proxy/proxy_maybe
Hello, ???I am trying to setup dovecot director and am receiving a lot of "Aborted login (proxy dest auth failed)" and "error proxying loops to itself" messages in the dovecot log. I don't fully understand the dovecot-ldap.conf file config? could someone please let me know if the following is correct. If so what could be causing the errors mentioned above, if not what
2008 Dec 05
1
proxy and master user
Hi For some application we need a master user on our IMAP servers. We use dovecot 1.1.7 in proxy mode, with proxy_maybe (some mailboxes are on the proxy itself, others are on remote servers, also running dovecot). But the proxy removes the '*master' suffix from the username when using the master user to log in on the proxy. So the base name of the user with the master password are
2010 Dec 04
3
1.2.15 - segfault if host field attribute not present in ldap. (proxy)
In case this is relevant: kernel: [17549.714369] imap-login[11704]: segfault at 0 ip b75c3d23 sp bf888178 error 4 in libc-2.11.2.so[b7551000+140000] If no host field attribute is present in ldap (like mailHost for qmail-ldap), and we are trying to use proxy, then dovecot segfaults. If more information's needed, let me know. Also, somewhat unrelated, but maybe the wiki needs to be edited
2019 Dec 06
1
director option
Hi, I think option-2 below seems better or am I missing something with director concept. 1. As director and back-end in same server (broken) not recommended, I need minimum 4 servers (2 for director, 2 back-end IMAP). Indexes and mail must be in NFS shared storage(not optimal), as a user may land on any of the back-end servers (assuming no static mapping of user from pass DB). 2) Proxy_may