similar to: Replication master/master

two servers with replicated master/master. dovecot.conf = http://pastebin.com/jVnvyWZM with this setup letters processed local filter duplicated. ?ie when the mail client receives a letter begins processing using rules (filters) to move the letters in a different folder. summarized in this folder is two duplicate letters.? if you disable the filter, the message is not duplicated. But does not

Hi Evgeny, Quentin and Matthias found it was a problem about subreg live range update and will push a fix soon (http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20170123/424126.html). Thanks, Wei. On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:35 AM, Wei Mi <wmi at google.com> wrote: > Sure. Will keep you posted. > > Thanks, > Wei. > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Evgeny

Hi Wei, Thank you for information. Please let me know about any progress in fixing the failures. I can help with checking that the final patch gives the same level of performance improvements. Kind regards, Evgeny Astigeevich Senior Compiler Engineer Compilation Tools ARM > -----Original Message----- > From: Wei Mi [mailto:wmi at google.com] > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 6:20 PM

Hi Sanjay, Thank you for your analysis. It’s interesting why the x86 machine is not affected. Maybe the x86 backend is smarter than the AArch64 backend, or it might be micro-architectural differences. I don’t mind to keep the changes on trunk. What I’d like to see is who will/should be involved in solving the issue. What kind of help/support is needed? Should we (ARM Compilation Tools) start

Confirm there is no change in IR if the hack is disabled in the sources. David wrote that these instructions are created by SCEV. Are other targets affected by the changes, e.g. X86? Kind regards, Evgeny Astigeevich Senior Compiler Engineer Compilation Tools ARM From: Sanjay Patel [mailto:spatel at rotateright.com] Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 10:45 PM To: Evgeny Astigeevich Cc: llvm-dev; nd

> On Jan 23, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > All targets are likely affected in some way by the icmp+shl fold introduced with r292492. It's a basic pattern that occurs in lots of code. Did you see any perf wins on your targets with this commit? > > Sadly, it is also likely that many (all?) targets are negatively

Hi , I 've been trying to get my 2 Samba DCs to replicate between each other but it fails DC1: Freebsd-9.1-Release, Samba 4.02, hostname ldap1, objectGUID: a2454bb4-9f94-4879-a5ff-c1a40537cb5e DC2: Freebsd-9.1-Release, Samba 4.02, hostname ldap2, objectGUID: 0103c98e-0b54-4ca4-a4e5-2259fa6b0563 ===the output showrepl command========== [root at ldap1 ~]# samba-tool drs showrepl

Thank you for information. I’ll build clang without the hack and re-run the benchmark tomorrow. -Evgeny From: Sanjay Patel [mailto:spatel at rotateright.com] Sent: Sunday, January 22, 2017 8:00 PM To: Evgeny Astigeevich Cc: llvm-dev; nd Subject: Re: [InstCombine] rL292492 affected LoopVectorizer and caused 17.30%/11.37% perf regressions on Cortex-A53/Cortex-A15 LNT machines > Do you mean to

> On Jan 24, 2017, at 7:18 AM, Sanjay Patel <spatel at rotateright.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini at apple.com <mailto:mehdi.amini at apple.com>> wrote: > >> On Jan 23, 2017, at 3:48 PM, Sanjay Patel via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: >>

I'm trying to configure Squid ntlm autentication on Samba4 DC. I followed Squid and Samba's documentation and i got success when I login with user natalia.silva, but if I log with natalia.vaz i get the error -- Nat?lia Vaz Silva Administradora de redes

Hi Sanjay, The benchmark source file: http://www.llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/test-suite/trunk/SingleSource/Benchmarks/Shootout/sieve.c?view=markup Clang options used to produce the initial IR: clang -DNDEBUG -O3 -DNDEBUG -mcpu=cortex-a53 -fomit-frame-pointer -O3 -DNDEBUG -w -Werror=date-time -c sieve.c -S -emit-llvm -mllvm -disable-llvm-optzns --target=aarch64-arm-linux Opt options: opt -O3

Hi Graham, I created a bug report with a reproducer for the failures I’ve got: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35288 I have also found that LTO reverts everything the partial inliner has done. Maybe the partial inliner should not be used at the first LTO phase (compilation). I hope I’ll have a chance to look at the code size regressions this week. Thanks, Evgeny Astigeevich From:

Hi Wei, Your reversion of rL292621 caused about 7% performance regressions in our benchmark on Cortex-M7/M4. In your commit comment I see it causes build bot failures. What kind are the failures? Compiler crashes or incorrect code generation? Will you fix them? We are interested in the changes because of performance improvements they give. Kind regards, Evgeny Astigeevich Senior Compiler

Hi Evgeny, I just realized that if these are compile-time errors I can help investigate on my end. Do you have something I can use to reproduce? Cheers, Graham Yiu LLVM Compiler Development IBM Toronto Software Lab Office: (905) 413-4077 C2-707/8200/Markham Email: gyiu at ca.ibm.com From: Graham Yiu/Toronto/IBM To: Evgeny Astigeevich <Evgeny.Astigeevich at arm.com> Cc:

I am having a problem with rsync hanging after completion. The command I am using is: rsync -vaz --delete /banproc/ backenp650:/banproc (thanks jw for the syntax correction) There were 56 deletions on the destination and ~ 1380 files copied total (I gathered these stats by using grep and wc -l on a saved file of my ssh session to the source host). Below is the last couple of lines on my ssh

I keep having some replication issues and not sure what can be done to resolve or correct. It does not seem to happen all the time, though for the last ~30 or so minutes and many messages seems to be happening consistent for me. I have 2 mail servers, basically clones, and thus master master replication. Most of the time things work fine. But many times an email or several will arrive on one,

> But if we still need to deal with CIEs and generate .eh_frame_hdr in a special way, > does it make sense to make this change to simplify only a small part of a linker? For huge C++ projects this could improve link time if GC is a bottleneck. It will also improve eh_frame_hdr build time because you don’t spend time on parsing garbage. However a linker will have to have two versions of GC:

Something very scary just happened to me while I was creating a ksh script to rsync mulitple FS between two hosts. Here is the script, notice the 'i' at the end of rsync line, it got put there by mistake. You also see the contents of $FSLIST cat'd below the script. When I ran this, it started to delete files in root's home directory and place files from the fist FS,

I am performing the bit analysis, so actually I want to propagate information about bits from operands to the instruction (the result of instruction), and every time I access the Instruction first , than get the operands, then access to the next instruction. That was the only problem, that I keep a map from Instruction to bit info and was confused, is Instruction, that I am putting to map, is the

Dear list, I have setup a master-master replication setup. My primairy MX's send email over on a DNS loadbalanced way, so DNS is doing some kind of round-robin way of sending mail to both master servers. I found out, that on one of the two machines, the email synchronisation is heavily delayed. Lets assume server A receives a mail from the MX; it synchronises almost instantly with the other