similar to: Xen private network across multiple physical servers

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 2000 matches similar to: "Xen private network across multiple physical servers"

2007 Oct 08
6
stub actions that depend on the parameter
Hi, I''m pretty new to all related to bdd and rspec and I have the following question. Is it possible to stub actions that return different objects depending on the parameteres they were called with? Something like this: MyClass.stub!(:method).with(1).and_return(@mock_object_1) MyClass.stub!(:method).with(2).and_return(@mock_object_2) I know I could use
2008 Oct 16
2
rails and security
Hi, I am wondering if there is a way to secure rails application logs ? My issue is that I discovered that form parameters are shown in clear in the logs. So when users are authenticating, you see the login and password in clear Processing LoginController#index (for xxxxx at 2008-10-16 11:22:43) [POST] Session ID: 8cb95e2e50332added5715eff9e84938 Parameters:
2006 Jan 01
4
rails under windows and mysql make webrick unstable
hi, I have installed ruby and rails under windows(exactly this one: http://rubyforge.org/frs/download.php/4174/ruby182-15.exe that includes rubygems) the thing is that while trying to install the mysql gem, it seemd to try to build the native extension, so I finally added a compiled version that I found in http://dema.ruby.com.br/ the problem is that webrick behaves quite unstable while
2006 Jan 01
5
scaffold not working on Windows XP
Hello, I did a fresh install of ruby182 and gem rails --include-dependencies Now when I do: rails receipts cd receipts ruby script\generate scaffold receipt receipt rails does not create the views or controller. What can I do? Thanks Frank
2020 Apr 01
2
Versions in RHEL and CentOS
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:44 AM Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 3/30/20 11:20 PM, Thomas Stephen Lee wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I had a doubt regarding RHEL/CentOS Versions. > > > > https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/amd > > > > in the he Notes > > > > No (8) > > > > says > > > >
2018 Feb 04
1
Troubleshooting glusterfs
Please help troubleshooting glusterfs with the following setup: Distributed volume without replication. Sharding enabled. [root at master-5f81bad0054a11e8bf7d0671029ed6b8 uploads]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv0 Type: Distribute Volume ID: 1a7e05f6-4aa8-48d3-b8e3-300637031925 Status: Started Snapshot Count: 0 Number of Bricks: 27 Transport-type: tcp Bricks: Brick1:
2018 Feb 04
1
Fwd: Troubleshooting glusterfs
Please help troubleshooting glusterfs with the following setup: Distributed volume without replication. Sharding enabled. # cat /etc/centos-release CentOS release 6.9 (Final) # glusterfs --version glusterfs 3.12.3 [root at master-5f81bad0054a11e8bf7d0671029ed6b8 uploads]# gluster volume info Volume Name: gv0 Type: Distribute Volume ID: 1a7e05f6-4aa8-48d3-b8e3-300637031925 Status:
2010 Jan 05
4
xen domU ID and static routing
Hi, I use a EQ 4 dedicated root server by hetzner with ubuntu jaunty. I installed xen 3.3 with debian kernel and brought up 3 domUs. Now comes networking... Hetzner does not allow bridged networking so I have to use routed mode in xen. No Problem so far, but the Problem actually is: When I bring up a domU the routing table is created by the xen-script vif-routing. The network interface name
2014 Feb 25
3
assigning a single IP to the guest with "typical" hosting provider
I have a server with a hosting company, Hetzner. The servers at this hosting company have a public IP, let's say, A.B.C.D/255.255.255.x. Additionally, one can order extra IPs like below: 1) additional subnet (let's say X.Y.Z.0 / 28) 2) single IP (let's say, E.F.G.H) With additional subnet, assigning the IP to libvirt guest is simple: - assign X.Y.Z.1 on the host - assign X.Y.Z.2
2020 Apr 02
4
Versions in RHEL and CentOS
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 12:33 PM Peter Kjellstr?m <cap at nsc.liu.se> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:01:04 +0530 > Thomas Stephen Lee <lee.iitb at gmail.com> wrote: > ... > > Thanks for the information ?. > > Rented a new EPYC Rome Server from Hetzner, but sensors does not show > > status of all cores in list, which is why I asked. > > Curious what
2013 Jan 08
4
XCP Debian 7 - Routed mode
Hi everyone, I just got a brand new server by Hetzner.de. The thing is, when you have additional IP, to use routed mode (precisely a subnet of IP, story of exposed MAC in their data center etc.) Bridged mode is NOT possible for getting connectivity in VM''s. Traditionally, I''m more confident with "standard" Xen setup, so it''s easy to switch from bridged to
2007 Feb 05
2
recv vs. read in HTTPRequest#read_socket
Hello all, The following change to Mongrel::HttpRequest: def read_socket(len) if !@socket.closed? data = @socket.recv(len) # <--- formerly @socket.read(len) if !data raise "Socket read return nil" elsif data.length != len raise "Socket read returned insufficient data: #{data.length}" else data end else raise "Socket
2014 Feb 14
2
Networkfilters in Routed setup
Hello! Since i could not find any information on the internet about this subject, i'm going to try my luck on this list. I'm trying to setup network-filter on a routed setup. I have a root-server at Hetzner, a german hosting provider. Along with my server i ordered a (/28) subnet to be able to setup dedicated IPs for my virtual machines (KVM). My Server is running Ubuntu 12.04 with
2018 Feb 05
2
Fwd: Troubleshooting glusterfs
Hi, I see a lot of the following messages in the logs: [2018-02-04 03:22:01.544446] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1821:mgmt_getspec_cbk] 0-glusterfs: No change in volfile,continuing [2018-02-04 07:41:16.189349] W [MSGID: 109011] [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 48-gv0-dht: no subvolume for hash (value) = 122440868 [2018-02-04 07:41:16.244261] W [fuse-bridge.c:2398:fuse_writev_cbk] 0-glusterfs-fuse:
2018 Feb 05
0
Fwd: Troubleshooting glusterfs
On 5 February 2018 at 15:40, Nithya Balachandran <nbalacha at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I see a lot of the following messages in the logs: > [2018-02-04 03:22:01.544446] I [glusterfsd-mgmt.c:1821:mgmt_getspec_cbk] > 0-glusterfs: No change in volfile,continuing > [2018-02-04 07:41:16.189349] W [MSGID: 109011] > [dht-layout.c:186:dht_layout_search] 48-gv0-dht: no
2013 Nov 07
3
status=undeliverable (lost connection with mail.larptreff.de[private/dovecot-lmtp] while sending MAIL FROM)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Good morning dovecot-community, I noticed a strange log-entry since the last day: Nov 7 08:34:42 hetzner postfix/lmtp[3764]: 61CB01A3938: to=<jg+introversion at larptreff.de>, relay=mail.larptreff.de[private/dovecot-lmtp], delay=0.05, delays=0.01/0.01/0.02/0.01, dsn=4.4.2, status=undeliverable (lost connection with
2013 Nov 10
1
10.0-BETA3 em/nfe drivers on MSI K9NBPM2-FID board. LAN card changes.
Hi, I have a server at Hetzner and something strange happend. First, I installed FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 (amd64) via their FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE rescue system, that's ok. I had to configure the network by using the em driver -> em0 interface. But suddenly, the network was lost. After an ACPI reboot, nothing. Going to the vKVM show me the system didn't detected em0 anymore but an nVidia
2014 Feb 19
2
Re: Networkfilters in Routed setup
On Di, 2014-02-18 at 16:06 -0700, Eric Blake wrote: > There should be no problem upgrading to a newer libvirt. We take great > pains to ensure that a newer version of libvirt can be reloaded and > gracefully understand the XML recorded by older versions, with no loss > to running VMs. While there have been bugs on this front, they get > caught and patched quickly, so by updating
2018 Feb 05
2
Fwd: Troubleshooting glusterfs
Hello Nithya! Thank you so much, I think we are close to build a stable storage solution according to your recommendations. Here's our rebalance log - please don't pay attention to error messages after 9AM - this is when we manually destroyed volume to recreate it for further testing. Also all remove-brick operations you could see in the log were executed manually when recreating volume.
2019 Apr 11
1
Mail account brute force / harassment
> Am 11.04.2019 um 12:43 schrieb Marc Roos via dovecot <dovecot at dovecot.org>: > > Please do not assume anything other than what is written, it is a > hypothetical situation > > > A. With the fail2ban solution > - you 'solve' that the current ip is not able to access you > - it will continue bothering other servers and admins > - you get the