similar to: NTLM authentication in Thunderbird vs Outlook 2010.

Hi, Dovecot 2.1.12 sends panic message when it tries to authenticate some users. Apparently because they use different authentication mechanisms on different email clients at the same time. For example, in debug logs this user uses CRAM-MD5, NTLM and PLAIN in account settings of his email clients. All passwords are stored in plain text (base64) in LDAP. Please advise me what I can tweak to fix

Hai, Have you seen : https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Authenticating_Freeradius_against_Active_Directory Test with : ntlm_auth --allow-mschapv2 --request-nt-key --domain=COMPANY --username=domainuser --password=userpassword Greetz, Louis > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens Oleg > Blyahher via samba > Verzonden:

Hi there, I'm trying to get FreeRADIUS to authenticate against my Samba DC. It's Samba 4.7.6-ubuntu running on Ubuntu 18 (kernel version 4.15.0-66-generic). It came nicely packaged with Zentyal, which provides a nice GUI for managing a domain, as well as a CA and lots of cool small features. That same Zentyal also includes support for FreeRADIUS (3.0.16). This is my smb.conf:

Hi All, Has anyone had a similar problem with ext3? A 75 gig partition in 24x7 use for about 2 weeks - no problems. Today I ran bonnie++ on the partition to get a feel for the performance, with ext3 and quotas enabled. The box started swapping like crazy on and abruptly froze at at the 'Delete files in random order' step. There was no kernel error messages or the like. This partition

Hello, I've got a problem with connection to my SIP provider. In general, everything works, but I get lots of these messages: Oct 17 19:10:06 DEBUG[29707]: chan_sip.c:11148 handle_request: That's odd... Got a response on a call we dont know about. Cseq 42710 Cmd SIP/2.0 Oct 17 19:10:06 DEBUG[29707]: chan_sip.c:11148 handle_request: That's odd... Got a response on a call

Hello, Please somebody suggest me how to remove the "*masteruser" appendix from the dovecot director database while using masteruser authentication. My situation is: - all users get authenticated in LDAP on the dovecot-director frontend - then they are forwarded to dovecot backend as username*masteruser ( this is a way how to proxy users with encrypted passwords). To enable it a added

Hi All, I have compared Dovecot performance to Courier and it appears that as a POP3 server Dovecot is slower in 2 times but as an IMAP server it is faster in 1.5 times. The same node (16CPUs), testing time is 30 min, please see results and dovecot configs attached. Benchmark software is MStone used by Sendmail Inc so is is quite reliable. I do not see anything else to tweak in Dovecot to

I am having trouble getting PCI Passthrough to work from Dom0 running CentOS 7 to DomU runnning Debian 8 I am using Xen 4.6 with CentOS kernel 3.18.34-20.el7.x86_64 on a Dell Poweredge T430. I think I have set it all up correctly, but I see no message when putting a USB device into any of the USB slots on the DomU There are three other DomUs running, but I have no need of PCI Passthrough set up

Hi there I'm having trouble getting winbindd working properly (I think). My understanding is that winbindd uses a kerberos 5 session (with 2003 server) to authenticate the machine to ADS, before any users have logged in. Then it uses that session ticket to authenticate all users of the smb server. Is that correct ? I can run kinit ok, and klist shows me a krb5 ticket (using a Domain

Okay, the jist of this whole thing, I get this infamous (?) problem, I have been trying to search though the archives of samba-general on gmane and also in my archive of this list. I have only seen requests for the magical answer. Environment: W2K/W2K3 mixed ADS going Native ADS only soon. Samba 3.0.4 compiled from source on a RHEL AS30 machine. MIT Kerberos v1.3.4 also compiled from source.

I followed Marks SNMP howto on Voip Magazine and ran into a small problem... (http://www.voip-magazine.com/content/view/2877/0/1/3/) When asterisk is running as a non-root user (asterisk) SNMP request for for the Asterisk MIB tree return nothing. If I quit asterisk and run it as root, all is fine. Does anyone have a idea what is going on? I have never used agentX, so I am unsure of what it is

Dear, all. I am pulling my hair because I could not find any error messsages that could point me to a fix to my problem. The directory I want to share was mounted on /home with drbd and heartbeat but then my users could not access any shares / their home directories. However, if I set up shares else where on my box like share under /opt or /usr/local, then the same users would be able to access

Hi, I''m writing puppet modules since a couple of weeks now, so I''m still considering myself as a new comer in this field. It seems that modules I can find on the web or the recipe page on the wiki almost all use a design pattern where the module is shipped in one or several class(es) whose configuration are determined by "global" or nodes variables ala: module: class

-----Original Message----- From: VR-Bug Support Sent: 15 October 2003 13:42 To: 'Gavin Davenport' Subject: RE: [Samba] Re: domain groups accessing samba share Hi Gavin, This is what I have for my /etc/pam.d/login #%PAM-1.0 auth required pam_securetty.so auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_winbind.so auth sufficient /lib/security/pam_unix.so nodelay

Hi! I have updated our server from Samba 4 alpha 17 to Samba 4.0.1. Everything seems to work fine after some reconfiguration, but our GPOs are not working anymore. Samba 4 alpha 17 was using ntvfs and the root partition with the sysvol share was mounted with "user_xattr" only in /etc/fstab. Samba 4.0.1 is now set to use s3fs and the root partition is mouted with

Hi All, I am a newbie to libvirt. I am trying to set up a Lxc container using a nat based network. I am able to create the container and log into it. But I don't see any interface created by default in the container. In other words my ifconfig inside the container does not show up any interfaces even if I run 'ifconfig lo up' for a loop back interface. Also I don't have any dhcp

Hi, I stumbled on the dir_index option of recent ext2 implementation which would be interesting for our mailservers (running dovecot with maildir) and found out that the newer ext2progs are able to cope with it; the 2.6 kernels do also but for the 2.4 kernels I still require a patch. Is that correct? Which patch would be the correct one to apply to the current 2.4.27 kernel ? Can anybody

I wonder if anyone is actually running SpamAssassin with Postfix/Amavisd-new under CentOS-6.4 . I have followed the instructions in <http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Amavisd> but as far as I can see SpamAssassin is not working. I should say that I do not understand from this document what is meant to happen to spam. I understand that a Spam header is added, but what actually happens to email

Hai Amos, Thank you for your very clear responce.. few small questions.. Is there a way to setup the proxy for the following. 1) use negotiate kerberos for auth, ( which is working already for all domain joined machines ) 2) use a fall back that works, for now basic ldap works for non windows machines, and domain joined machines. 3) use any other fallback way for authentication users on windows

... sorry wrong list.. but you can read it and learn from it.. :-)) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens >L.P.H. van Belle >Verzonden: dinsdag 18 augustus 2015 9:45 >Aan: samba at lists.samba.org >Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] [squid-users] debian Jessie squid with >auth (kerberos/ntlm/basic) ERROR