similar to: vpn client setup/plugin

Hi, anybody successfully running win32 client with Cisco vpn client against ipsec-tools? I'm looking for elegantly running VPN road warrior solution. Scenarios are: - ipsec-tools with Cisco vpn client - pptpd with Windows XP native client - OpenVPN with OpenVPN Windows client - ??? Any hints? Thanks for reply. David Hrb??

I have the following network: External Interface External Interface ccc.ccc.ccc.ccc aaa.aaa.aaa.aaa | | --> VPN <--> Internet <--> FreeBSD Client (NATed extip: bbb.bbb.bbb.bbb) | FW-1 Protected Net ddd.ddd.ddd.ddd/24 VPN: ipsec freeswan (UDP encapsulated tunnel) ccc.ccc.ccc.ccc has port 136/UDP open for

I am looking for the optimal VPN. Well it doens't have to be that elaborate. Just the best VPN. We currently have some customers using PPTP, some using openvpn, some using Cisco Any Connect and there are a few others. So my question is, if you have control of both ends (client and server) what is the best VPN to use? There are not too many requirements, but a big one is The VPN must return

And openvpn. Avoid ipsec as it's too complex and pptp is unsecure. Eero 4.4.2016 9.55 ip. "Richard Zimmerman" <rzimmerman at riverbendhose.com> kirjoitti: > SoftEther VPN > > Once setup, it just works.... > > Regards, > > Richard > > > --- > Richard Zimmerman > Systems / Network Administrator > River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc. > 1111 S

Hi list! I'm sure the topic has been discussed but I could not find what I was looking for. What would be the best / easiest VPN software solution. I would like to install vpn software on the * server for roadwarriors to connect to with laptops running windows. Ideally the vpn solution will not require any additional software on the client side but will use IPSEC. (Ofcourse call quality

On 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote: > This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here. > They, too, kind of recommend openvpn. > http://www.howtogeek.com/211329/which-is-the-best-vpn-protocol-pptp-vs.-openvpn-vs.-l2tpipsec-vs.-sstp/ > This is not good information. In brief: "There are some concerns that the NSA could have weakened the standard,

Hi All, Is it possible to establish site-to-site VPN using dynamic IP addresss assigned by ISP ? If yes, I would like to request a sample ipsec.conf for such scenario... Thanks and warmest regards aslay ################################################### # This message has been scanned for viruses and # # dangerous content by Pensteel Digital Solutions # # Open Source Security Server,

Hello Greg, I am writing you, because I saw your responses to a couple of messages on the freebsd-security mailing list related to freebsd vpn and nat. My situations is rather unique, and I am needing an expert's eyes to glance at it and confirm whether it is doable or not. I have a simple diagram that illustrates what I am trying to do, and it is located here (about 40k):

Hi list, I have to build vpn server for 1500 clients. No encryption necessary. can anyone please recommend me vpn server. I do not have experience on vpn. I have tested openvpn on my test setup, & its working fine. I want to check if there any other vpn server available. I have not checked but can pptp vpn be usefull? My requirement is to connect 1500 clients on vpn server. Need

Hi: We intend to build IPSec based VPN server on FreeBSD platform so that we can access internal network of a lab. The remote side will use VPN client and could be from anywhere of the Internet, or may be from the another site of the company. From the hnadbook, I saw the sample of site-to-site configurations and we do have one FreeBSD firewall (running ipfw) on both site and another one on

Hi, I am facing a task of choosing vpn server. I do not know which is better. The one distributed with CentOS4.5 only supports pppd (or maybe pptp but I cannot find it). If* *I want to use PPTP or L2TP, which one should I choose? OpenVPN? Poptop? Thanks. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

So far, OpenVPN has been working very well for me. Unfortunately, the iPhone doesn't have (yet?) an OpenVPN client, so I'm forced to work with what's available. The options are: L2TP, PPTP and IPSec. If you were to install a VPN endpoint on CentOS, which protocol would you prefer? The condition is to avoid shabby VPN servers that make the system less secure. I've seen some

IPSec is not recommended solution nowdays. OpenVPN runs top of single udp or tcp port, so it usually works on strictly firewalled places like in hotels and so on. -- Eero 2016-04-04 23:18 GMT+03:00 Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com>: > On 04/04/2016 10:57 AM, david wrote: > >> I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan (and >> probably

Hi All, This is a general VPN question; PPTP VPNs seem to be very easy to set up with CentOS as the VPN server and the built-in windose client, but how do list members feel about the security vunerabilities reported with the MS implementation? Specifically the 6 problems reported here : http://www.schneier.com/pptp-faq.html or maybe im being paranoid? Would any of you roll this solution out

I've got multiple satellite office all linked back to the main office via VPN. Each office has their own asterisk server which registers back to the main office's Asterisk server. Each office also has a 1Mb downstream / 384k - 768k upstream connection. The branches are using Speex for their connections back to the main office. The issue I'm having is that there are times that

Folks I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home server via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my home network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for any external query, but also let me access my computers inside my home. I already have this working using M$'s PPTP using my home Centos 6 gateway/router as the PoPToP server.

Hi list, I am trying to create a VPN between two different locations. On the first location we have a cisco pix 525 Natting the internal 192.168.100.x network, while on the second location we have a Centos3 box Natting via iptables the internal 192.168.10.x netowrk. My goal is to connect this 2 over the internet via IPsec. I created the IPsec Net2Net via the network configuration graphic

Have a 2003 server located outside of the Domain network over a VPN. The server originally existed inside the network (10.1.1.0/24) but now exists on 10.10.12.0/24. I can access shares over the VPN to the domain controller, but when I try to log in as a domain user it says the domain is unavailable. I added the domain controller as a WINS server on the 2003 server. nbtstat -c on the 2003 does

I am running Samba 3.4.8 as a PDC on Solaris 10. I recently made this the WINS master- previously the BDC (Samba 3.0.37 on another Solaris 10 server.) I also use Sonicwall ipsec VPN for remote access (Windows XP clients.) The sonicwall client creates a virtual NIC on the client so that the client can have an IP address directly on the company LAN (ie. the same LAN as the samba

I imagine something like Cisco AnyConnect on Windows, where you can connect before login to the machine. So afterwards user specific network shares are available and can be connect via scripts. I have an openvpn server running. Regards Tim Am 1. Mai 2015 13:34:48 MESZ, schrieb Jim Perrin <jperrin at centos.org>: > > >On 04/30/2015 03:42 PM, Tim wrote: >> Hi all, >>