similar to: Possible bug: TC with HFSC fails to load if umax is not provided

My problem with HFSC tc command is ... tc command''s HFSC have a lot parameter with 4 curve type SC curve -> umax dmax rate LS curve -> umax dmax rate RT curve -> umax dmax rate UL curve -> umax dmax rate so i''dont know which parameter are appropriate for my test case such real time class which curve are appropriate and good working result. my assumption about

hi, I would like to use the HFSC scheduler for my QoS. I''ve 4 class and 2 of them need to control the bandwidth and the latencies so I think I must use HFSC. So I read some doc ( http://del.icio.us/tag/hfsc ) but its not very clear. I make some tests with differents parameters but I''m not able to use correctly this scheduler: $TC qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: hfsc default 40

When I start my script: * - Creating classes on br1 for upload control ... * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:0 classid 2:46 hfsc ls m1 576.0Kbit d 2000ms m2 192.0Kbit ul m2 384Kbit ... [ ok ] * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:46 classid 2:47 hfsc sc umax 1500b dmax 30ms rate 80Kbit . [ ok ] * - tc class add dev br1 parent 2:46 classid 2:48 hfsc ls m2 152.0Kbit ul m2 152.0Kbit

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful me ... my question is 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about in each chain must identify

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful me ... my question is 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about in each chain must identify fallback

I have a lot question about tc-command because now i''m doing research to compare performance between HTB and  HFSC so i''m doubt a lot thing and your reply are so very helpful to me ... My question is In HTB tc command question 1. I''m use opensource (Mastershaper) for help to config traffic control but when i''m try to config HTB, I''m doubt about

Hello, I’ve read this Article avout VOIP and HFSC http://automatthias.wordpress.com/2006/06/30/hfsc-and-voip/ I’ve got few questions ? Considering this tc class add dev $DEV parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc \ rt m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[1*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ls m1 ${UPLINK}kbit d 50ms m2 $[3*$UPLINK/10]kbit \ ul rate ${UPLINK}kbit rt = realtime curve ls = linksharing curve but m1 = ? m2 = ? d =

Hi, Is it possible to attach another qdisq under a HFSC classfull ? I try it and the configuraton works : $TC qdisc add dev $dev root handle 1: hfsc default 30 $TC class add dev $dev parent 1: classid 1:1 hfsc sc rate ${RATE}mbit ul rate ${RATE}mbit $TC class add dev $dev parent 1:1 classid 1:10 hfsc rt umax 1500b dmax 30ms rate 200kbit $TC class add dev $dev

Shorewall 4.5.21.4 is now available for download. Problems corrected since 4.5.21.3: 1) The Broadcast actions have been corrected: o --dst-type BROADCAST has been removed from the IPv6 version o A superfluous DROP rule in the IPv4 version has been suppressed. 2) Previously, if an HFSC class was specified with dmax but not umax, then the firewall would fail to start with the

Hi, I''m fighting seriously with a most simple HTB setup. I''d like to share the incoming 64kbps into 5 and 59 for two different machines under NAT. HTB seems to hold the required limits when ceil is not set (no borrowing), but when borrowing enabled it seems to share equally rather then keeping the specified ratio. My setup is below. A typical output of "tc -s -d qdisc

Hello, First I want to point out that I''m not so familiar with HFSC, since there not so much info online. But here is my script: ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:0 classid 1:1 hfsc ls rate 100mbit ul rate 100mbit ${TC} class add dev ${LAN_IFACE} parent 1:1 classid 1:2 hfsc ls rate 90mbit ul rate 90mbit ${TC} class add

Ok, shaping on Linux is new to me.. so bear with me if i am just stupid. curtain:/etc/shorewall# grep TC shorewall.conf | grep -v ^# TCP_FLAGS_LOG_LEVEL=info TC_ENABLED=Yes CLEAR_TC=Yes TCP_FLAGS_DISPOSITION=DROP curtain:/etc/shorewall# So it should be enabled, right? ---- tcrules ---- 1 eth0 0.0.0.0/0 all 2 eth1 0.0.0.0/0 all 2 eth2 0.0.0.0/0

## Package Needed library(fields) ## Assumptions set.seed(123) nsim<-5 p<-2 ## Generate Random Matrix G G <- matrix(runif(p*nsim),nsim,p) ## Set Empty Matraces dmax and dmin dmax<- matrix(data=NA,nrow=nsim,ncol=p) dmin<- matrix(data=NA,nrow=nsim,ncol=p) ## Loop to Fill dmax and dmin for(i in 1:nsim) { dmax[i]<- max(rdist(G[i,,drop=FALSE],G)) dmin[i]<-

Hello I have a number of data files which are outputs for each step of a simulation. The data is organized like this: dmin dmax coef 5 6 0.490981 3 8 0.098056 5 6 0.425926 6 6 0.517860 2 4 0.527778 I would like to make a 3-d plot where one axis corresponds to (dmin, dmax) pair, one axis is the simulation

I am running 1.3.1 on a Windows (NT 4.0) machine. I've fit a nonlinear model intended to predict crop yield from nutrient information, and want to use the profile function. If I type say, profile(simparj.fm) I get the following error message: "Error in prof$getProfile(): number of iterations exceeded maximum of 5.25515e-308" I used the profiler function to profile simparj,fm step

Season Greetings to all Tom, in your faq, u have this noted: While I am currently using the HTB version of The Wonder Shaper (I just copied wshaper.htb to /etc/shorewall/tcstart and modified it as shown in the Wondershaper README), I treid this with wondershaper, using Bearing Leaf 1.0 stable i even changed the tc command to run_tc, and tried it in both angles, and i receive the following..

Dear All, a long time ago I ran a cluster analysis where the dissimilarity matrix used consisted of Dmax (or Kolmogorov-Smirnov distance) values. In other words the maximum difference between two cumulative proportion curves. This all worked very well indeed. The matrix was calculated using Dbase III+ and took a day and a half and the clustering was done using MV-ARCH, with the resultant

Hello, I am trying to set up traffic shaping/control for my voip connection. I am running 4.4.22.3. Here is my current configuration: --- tcdevices --- #NUMBER: IN-BANDWITH OUT-BANDWIDTH OPTIONS REDIRECTED #INTERFACE INTERFACES eth1 2048kbps 1500kbps -- tcclasses --- #INTERFACE:CLASS MARK RATE: CEIL PRIORITY OPTIONS # DMAX:UMAX eth1 1 100kbps

I did not subscribe to the list. I''ve been using shorewall for some time and I appreciate it very much. I think it would be useful to have an option to generate a script of the commands Shorewall is about to issue, instead of issuing the commands directly. This script could then be used for revision, modification, and could also be used on another system. I thought about modifying

http://www.shorewall.net/traffic_shaping.htm Page says run_tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:10 pfifo limit 5run_tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:20 pfifo limit 10 Im willing to _bet_ there is a line feed missing in there ;)