similar to: samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ does not fix hard link issue

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 130 matches similar to: "samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ does not fix hard link issue"

2014 Jul 09
1
samba wiki ( troubleshooting )
Hai, ? i was reading : http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Troubleshooting And im missing the part about the?compair of : ? ls -al /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb -rw------- 1 root root 4251648 Jun? 6 09:05 /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb ls -al /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/* -rw-rw---- 2 root bind? 4251648 Jul? 9 14:08
2014 Sep 08
0
samba-upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ fix hard links / A Record / PTR Record left
Hi, i have the following problem. I use the remote administration tools. I added a forward lookupzone A Record and would automtically add the suitable PTR Record. A Record was added but i miss the PTR Record. I have a foreward and reverse lookup zone. I use 4.1.6 and use now 4.1.11. Before it worked. I read at the wiki out that the sam.ldb.d and dns/sam.ldb.d are hard links. I checked that
2017 Oct 24
0
DNS database question
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:01:16 +0200 Giuseppe Arvati via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, > > I was checking my configuration regarding DNS > while I was reading > https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#New_DNS_Entries_Are_Not_Resolvable > > and I found that private/sam.ldb.d/ and private/dns/sam.ldb.d/ > are different > > # ls
2017 Oct 24
2
DNS database question
Hello, I was checking my configuration regarding DNS while I was reading https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#New_DNS_Entries_Are_Not_Resolvable and I found that private/sam.ldb.d/ and private/dns/sam.ldb.d/ are different # ls -lai /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/ 2760569 -rw-------. 1 root root 16400384 Oct 24 08:28 CN%3DCONFIGURATION,DC%3DAPAM-AD,DC%3DAPAM,DC%3DIT.ldb
2016 Aug 29
0
samba_upgradedns seg fault - Samba 4.4.5
Hi, I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here: https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend#Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ I get the following: [root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ Reading domain information Segmentation fault (core dumped)
2016 Sep 01
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
Hai Cameron, If you run: named -V Does that version match with the setting in : For example "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf"; I'm running debian so change the path above to your file. # # This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema # Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version # dlz "AD DNS Zone" { # For BIND
2016 Sep 02
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd > 11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo > gets its ideas from
2016 Sep 08
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:19 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote: >  > > I have now found out why you had to provision with samba43, > the '--use-ntvfs' option is gone from Samba 4.4.x. I never noticed > because, as I said, I never used it. > This does of course mean that you cannot use the latest versions of > Samba as an AD DC with freebsd unless somehow either
2016 Sep 02
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100 Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org > > wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100 > > Cameron Murdoch <cam at macaroon.net> wrote: > > > > > On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba
2016 Feb 02
0
samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "
On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote: > Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: >>> Hi at all, >>> >>> i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago >>> from an nt4-domain. >>> >>> By trying >>>
2016 Sep 01
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:31:57 +0100 Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On 1 September 2016 at 13:15, Rowland Penny via samba > <samba at lists.samba.org > > wrote: > > > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:24:38 +0100 > > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > >
2016 May 23
1
[samba_upgradedns] Error parsing DNS data
Hello Rowland, [Quote Bouke Henstra] I am trying to change over from bind9 to internal dns. For some reason I keep getting the following error: Error parsing DNS data from '/opt/samba/private/dns/TH01.INET.zone' () [..] [Quote Rowland Penny Are you using flat files with Samba and Bind ?? If so, what you are trying to do, will not work. Rowland [..] Thank you very much for your reply. I
2013 Oct 09
1
samba_upgradedns output
When I run: # samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ I get the following: lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf" Reading domain information lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf" DNS
2016 May 28
0
[samba_upgradedns] Error parsing DNS data
​Hello Andrew, Thank you for your reply (very much appreciated). > I take it you are trying to move from the flatfile based bind to internal. That is correct > The samba_upgradedns script is pretty simple, and uses the > dnspython library to read zone files. It certainly could be > the case that it just can't read the zone file after bind9 > has been doing dynamic updates
2016 Feb 02
0
samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "
On 02/02/16 13:38, Markus Dellermann wrote: > Hi again, > > Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 12:09:59 CET schrieb Rowland penny: >> On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote: >>> Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: >>>> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: > [....] >> Ok, there are two schools of thought here, you can
2016 Feb 01
2
samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "
Hi at all, i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago from an nt4-domain. By trying samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ i get the following error: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/samba_upgradedns", line 262, in <module> paths, lp.configfile, lp) File
2016 Sep 02
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On 2 September 2016 at 13:19, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org > wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0100 > Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100 > > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny
2016 Feb 02
1
samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "
Hi Rowland and al. > On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote: >> Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny: >>> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote: >>>> Hi at all, >>>> >>>> i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some >>>> time ago >>>> from an
2016 Sep 02
2
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100 Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd 11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo gets its ideas from :) After freebsd built everything in the chain of required packages, it finally built Samba, I did notice two things, one it built
2014 Sep 10
1
hard links DNS (sam.ldb.d folder)?
Hi, General Question. Anybody should answer this. Which files are really hard links and which not? from /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/ --> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/ 2872186 -rw-rw---- 1 root named 7675904 Sep 8 22:04 CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=SWI,DC=LOCAL.ldb <-? 2872187 -rw-rw---- 1 root named 9359360 Sep 8 22:04 CN=SCHEMA,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=SWI,DC=LOCAL.ldb <-? 2872184