Displaying 20 results from an estimated 130 matches similar to: "samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ does not fix hard link issue"
2014 Jul 09
1
samba wiki ( troubleshooting )
Hai,
?
i was reading :
http://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Samba_AD_DC_Troubleshooting
And im missing the part about the?compair of :
?
ls -al /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb
-rw------- 1 root root 4251648 Jun? 6 09:05 /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb
ls -al /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/*
-rw-rw---- 2 root bind? 4251648 Jul? 9 14:08
2014 Sep 08
0
samba-upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ fix hard links / A Record / PTR Record left
Hi,
i have the following problem.
I use the remote administration tools. I added a forward lookupzone A Record and would automtically add the suitable PTR Record.
A Record was added but i miss the PTR Record. I have a foreward and reverse lookup zone. I use 4.1.6 and use now 4.1.11. Before it worked.
I read at the wiki out that the sam.ldb.d and dns/sam.ldb.d are hard links. I checked that
2017 Oct 24
0
DNS database question
On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 09:01:16 +0200
Giuseppe Arvati via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was checking my configuration regarding DNS
> while I was reading
> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#New_DNS_Entries_Are_Not_Resolvable
>
> and I found that private/sam.ldb.d/ and private/dns/sam.ldb.d/
> are different
>
> # ls
2017 Oct 24
2
DNS database question
Hello,
I was checking my configuration regarding DNS
while I was reading
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/BIND9_DLZ_DNS_Back_End#New_DNS_Entries_Are_Not_Resolvable
and I found that private/sam.ldb.d/ and private/dns/sam.ldb.d/
are different
# ls -lai /usr/local/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/
2760569 -rw-------. 1 root root 16400384 Oct 24 08:28
CN%3DCONFIGURATION,DC%3DAPAM-AD,DC%3DAPAM,DC%3DIT.ldb
2016 Aug 29
0
samba_upgradedns seg fault - Samba 4.4.5
Hi,
I'm having the following issue when trying to switch from samba_internal to
bind9_dlz. I have been following the procedure here:
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Changing_the_DNS_backend#Changing_from_Samba_Internal_DNS_to_BIND_DLZ
I get the following:
[root at dc2 ~]# /usr/local/sbin/samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ
Reading domain information
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
2016 Sep 01
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
Hai Cameron,
If you run:
named -V
Does that version match with the setting in :
For example "/var/lib/samba/private/named.conf";
I'm running debian so change the path above to your file.
#
# This configures dynamically loadable zones (DLZ) from AD schema
# Uncomment only single database line, depending on your BIND version
#
dlz "AD DNS Zone" {
# For BIND
2016 Sep 02
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org
> wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100
> Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> >
>
> Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd
> 11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo
> gets its ideas from
2016 Sep 08
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Fri, 2016-09-02 at 13:19 +0100, Rowland Penny via samba wrote:
>
>
> I have now found out why you had to provision with samba43,
> the '--use-ntvfs' option is gone from Samba 4.4.x. I never noticed
> because, as I said, I never used it.
> This does of course mean that you cannot use the latest versions of
> Samba as an AD DC with freebsd unless somehow either
2016 Sep 02
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100
Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org
> > wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 11:51:02 +0100
> > Cameron Murdoch <cam at macaroon.net> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2 September 2016 at 09:53, Rowland Penny via samba
2016 Feb 02
0
samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "
On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny:
>> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote:
>>> Hi at all,
>>>
>>> i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago
>>> from an nt4-domain.
>>>
>>> By trying
>>>
2016 Sep 01
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 13:31:57 +0100
Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> On 1 September 2016 at 13:15, Rowland Penny via samba
> <samba at lists.samba.org
> > wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 12:24:38 +0100
> > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
2016 May 23
1
[samba_upgradedns] Error parsing DNS data
Hello Rowland,
[Quote Bouke Henstra]
I am trying to change over from bind9 to internal dns.
For some reason I keep getting the following error:
Error parsing DNS data from '/opt/samba/private/dns/TH01.INET.zone' ()
[..]
[Quote Rowland Penny
Are you using flat files with Samba and Bind ??
If so, what you are trying to do, will not work.
Rowland
[..]
Thank you very much for your reply.
I
2013 Oct 09
1
samba_upgradedns output
When I run:
# samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ
I get the following:
lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf
params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf"
Reading domain information
lpcfg_load: refreshing parameters from /etc/samba/smb.conf
params.c:pm_process() - Processing configuration file "/etc/samba/smb.conf"
DNS
2016 May 28
0
[samba_upgradedns] Error parsing DNS data
Hello Andrew,
Thank you for your reply (very much appreciated).
> I take it you are trying to move from the flatfile based bind to internal.
That is correct
> The samba_upgradedns script is pretty simple, and uses the
> dnspython library to read zone files. It certainly could be
> the case that it just can't read the zone file after bind9
> has been doing dynamic updates
2016 Feb 02
0
samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "
On 02/02/16 13:38, Markus Dellermann wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 12:09:59 CET schrieb Rowland penny:
>> On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote:
>>> Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny:
>>>> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote:
> [....]
>> Ok, there are two schools of thought here, you can
2016 Feb 01
2
samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "
Hi at all,
i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some time ago
from an nt4-domain.
By trying
samba_upgradedns --dns-backend=BIND9_DLZ
i get the following error:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/sbin/samba_upgradedns", line 262, in <module>
paths, lp.configfile, lp)
File
2016 Sep 02
0
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On 2 September 2016 at 13:19, Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org
> wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 13:03:05 +0100
> Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 12:41:47 +0100
> > Cameron Murdoch via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On 2 September 2016 at 12:21, Rowland Penny
2016 Feb 02
1
samba_upgradedns returned an error "Unable to find uid/gid for Domain Admins "
Hi Rowland and al.
> On 02/02/16 11:26, Markus Dellermann wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, 2. Februar 2016, 09:51:03 CET schrieb Rowland penny:
>>> On 01/02/16 22:24, Markus Dellermann wrote:
>>>> Hi at all,
>>>>
>>>> i´am using samba 4.3.4 as "ad", "migrated by classicupgrade" some
>>>> time ago
>>>> from an
2016 Sep 02
2
Segmentation fault in samba_upgradedns - Samba 4.4.5
On Thu, 1 Sep 2016 14:12:21 +0100
Rowland Penny via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote:
>
Trying to understand why you are getting the segfault, I set up freebsd
11.0rc2 in a VM and then installed samba44, I now know where Gentoo
gets its ideas from :)
After freebsd built everything in the chain of required packages, it
finally built Samba, I did notice two things, one it built
2014 Sep 10
1
hard links DNS (sam.ldb.d folder)?
Hi,
General Question. Anybody should answer this.
Which files are really hard links and which not?
from
/var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/ --> /var/lib/samba/private/sam.ldb.d/
2872186 -rw-rw---- 1 root named 7675904 Sep 8 22:04 CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=SWI,DC=LOCAL.ldb <-?
2872187 -rw-rw---- 1 root named 9359360 Sep 8 22:04 CN=SCHEMA,CN=CONFIGURATION,DC=SWI,DC=LOCAL.ldb <-?
2872184