similar to: Deleted messages reappearing

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 90 matches similar to: "Deleted messages reappearing"

2011 Oct 17
1
mail_location in LDAP and variables
Hi, Is it posible to use variables in mail_location when taken from ldap? How? I've tried mdbox:/buzones2/'%n'/mdbox mdbox:/buzones2/"%n"/mdbox mdbox:/buzones2/%n/mdbox but %n is never replaced by its value. Thanks! -- Joseba Torre. Vicegerencia de TICs, ?rea de Explotaci?n
2020 May 18
1
ether-wake
> Actually you are not correct. > > > 1st: I didn't quote the wikipedia article,? someone sent that as an > answer to my previous post. > > ?? (similar mindset probably, as in your response) > > 2: You are wrong,? broadcast packets, like for example DHCP, and also > WOL (if UDP), can be routed, by > > the means of ip helper addresses and directed broadcasts
2015 Jun 16
1
Strange problem with rsync and expect
Version: 3.0.6OS: CentOS 6.6 I met a strange problem when using rsync with expect. I wrote a script backing up using rsync and expect. However when I run the script twice for two different files at same time, the two files on destination path would be deleted automatically before the files closed. The output of inotify_wait was like: ./ MODIFY .redo02.log.dOlbek ./ DELETE .redo02.log.dOlbek
2003 Oct 26
0
Patches for samba 3.0.0 client/client.c
Patch against samba 3.0.0 client/client.c Mainly for -L parameter options 1.) Add a configurable connection delay. The default is too long. Add items to long_options of poptOption for help message, however I just put something "i.e. CONNSETUP" to the last parameter of long_options. It seems for use of documentation ???? 2.) Remark the code that require list_servers must using port
2019 Jan 19
3
[Bug 1317] New: ulogd missed flow.start.sec and flow.start.usec fields
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1317 Bug ID: 1317 Summary: ulogd missed flow.start.sec and flow.start.usec fields Product: ulogd Version: 2.0.0beta1 Hardware: All OS: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: ulogd Assignee:
1997 Sep 23
0
PATCH: Wins support in smbclient
I added WINS support to smbclient. The patch is against 1.9.17p1. To apply it, go to the source dir, and type "patch < client.diff". Btw, if there is anything wrong with the patch format, please tell me since this is my first patch. Baldur -------------- next part -------------- --- /root/client.c Tue Sep 23 21:52:21 1997 +++ client.c Tue Sep 23 22:17:21 1997 @@ -4136,8 +4136,20 @@
2000 Jul 17
0
[PATCH] `smbclient -M' ignores `-p port'
Peter: Thanks! It now works fine on Solaris 2.6. Now I just need to remember how to manipulate source RPMs so I can fix the Linux (RedHat 6.x) version. :-) pete > From peter@cadcamlab.org Sun Jul 16 16:41:17 2000 > Cc: <samba@samba.org> > Subject: [PATCH] `smbclient -M' ignores `-p port' > > [Pete Peterson <petersonp@genrad.com>] > > It appears
2012 Jul 17
3
doveadm director status username != doveadm director status username@mailserver
Hi, I've almost finished my new director based setup, but in the first test I discovered that imap and lmtp connections were not always being proxied to the same server. After some research now I think that the main problem is that in imap connections users connect as 'username' while lmtp connections are as 'username at mailserver'. In my current setup I receive mail via
2000 Jan 26
2
[2.0.6] doesn't run under Solaris 7/sparc, Internal Error
Is the following a known problem: =============================================================== [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(41) INTERNAL ERROR: Signal 11 in pid 22273 (2.0.6) Please read the file BUGS.txt in the distribution [2000/01/26 09:41:03, 0] lib/fault.c:fault_report(43) =============================================================== This is using the same
2020 May 18
3
ether-wake
On Sun, 2020-05-17 at 20:25 -0600, R C wrote: > Ok, I get that, found it before; "typically sent as a UDP datagram to > port 0, 7 or 9, or directly over Ethernet as EtherType 0x0842" > > > The keyword being 'typically', but what is it that ether-wake actually > uses/does? (I need to forward a WOL packet to a different > > vlan on some Cisco
2000 Jul 16
1
"smbclient -p <port>" appears to be broken in Samba 2.x
I posted this problem as a question to this list a while ago and got no reply. I submitted it as a bug, but found that "samba-bugs@samba.org", no longer accepts bug reports, even though the web page says to send them to that address. Wondering if the option had been intentionally discontinuted without updating the man page, I made a quick check of the source and found that the "-p
2006 Jul 26
15
Rails without a primary key
I''ve been trying to use Rails on a database where the biggest datawarehouse-style table doesn''t have a primary key. It really doesn''t make sense and just adds extra unnecessary space. I do have, however, a column that I normally use to search on (IP) that returns many rows. The table also references several other tables through rails-friendly foreign keys. Simple AR
2017 Jan 17
0
Reappearing emails
On Fri 04 Mar 2016 at 08:37 -0600, Ron Cleven wrote: > Recently we received a report from an Android IMAP user that emails that > he deleted without reading would often reappear in his INBOX. I have encountered this problem too. Did you ever solve it? Cheers // Fredrik Roubert -- Forsterstrasse 64 | +41 78 8170377 CH-8044 Z?rich | https://roubert.name/fredrik/
2017 Jan 17
1
Reappearing emails
The dovecot version (2.2.10) we were running had a timing window problem in the context of replication (we use maildir on CentOS 7). After doing elaborate tests to isolate the problem, we wound up upgrading to 2.2.23. That fixed it, and that version has been very reliable. >> Recently we received a report from an Android IMAP user that emails that >> he deleted without reading
2016 Mar 04
2
Reappearing emails
We have been running Dovecot 2.2.10 with a pair of CentOS 7 boxes with replications for the past year. We have been quite happy with the performance and reliability. Recently we received a report from an Android IMAP user that emails that he deleted without reading would often reappear in his INBOX. At first I thought it might be some quirky incompatibility with his email client, but I
2019 Sep 02
0
purge causing reappearing mails?
Hello, today i got reappearing mails again, but not from purging. In the logs i only found this. I've got massive problems by many users because reappearing mails. If you need more information, i could provide. Sep 02 12:58:43 doveadm: Warning: Transaction log file /var/spool/mail/<user>/storage/dovecot.map.index.log was locked for 43 second s (mdbox storage rebuild) Sep 02 12:58:43
2010 Oct 18
3
Roaming profiles and delete files reappearing.
Hello. I see a lot of people having this problem, but found not solution so far. The setup: samba 3.0.37 on FreeBSD 7.3/i386 acting as PDC; a similar BDC (only amd64) and XP clients. Users have roaming profiles on the PDC. What happens is: _ a laptop user disconnects from the network (so the local and server profiles are fully synchronized); _ at home [s]he deletes some files; _ back in the
2020 Sep 01
3
Deleted mail reappearing
Recently I upgraded dovecot quite a few major versions. Since then some mailboxes are experiencing deleted mail reappearing. It seems to be happening roughly once a day, but not for every mail client or mailbox, I have at least two clients with this issue: Thunderbird and Outlook. Storage is local under two partitions, one as alternative storage. # 2.3.7.2 (3c910f64b): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
2007 Feb 26
5
Multiple uplinks, ssh connections hang
Folks, Ive got two ISP connections that I am using with: --- ip route add 192.168.200.0/24 dev eth2 src 192.168.200.11 table connection1 ip route add default via 192.168.200.1 table connection1 ip route add x.175.244.0/24 dev eth1 src x.175.244.2 table connection2 ip route add default via x.175.244.1 table connection2 ip rule add from 192.168.200.11 table connection1 ip rule add from x.175.244.2
2019 Sep 02
1
purge causing reappearing mails?
Any idea what?pid 7584 is? Aki On 2.9.2019 14.08, telsch via dovecot wrote: > Hello, > > today i got reappearing mails again, but not from purging. In the logs i > only found this. I've got massive problems by many users because > reappearing mails. If you need more information, i could provide. > > > Sep 02 12:58:43 doveadm: Warning: Transaction log file >