similar to: MCID

Thanks a lot Tony and Dhaval for your much appreciable suggestions. Regards, Rajib Rajib Deka SIEMENS Ltd. Robert V Chandran Tower, First Floor, West Wing, #149, Velechery Tambaram Main Road, Pallikaranai, Chennai-100, INDIA. www.siemens.com Mob: +91-9176780669 | E-Mail: rajib.deka at siemens.com Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:55:25 +0530 From: DHAVAL INDRODIYA <dhaval.it01034 at gmail.com>

Hello List, Asterisk is blocking audio if 'F' flag is enabled in meetme with DTMF mode enabled as INFO for SIP channel. If it is a bug in asterisk or something need to be enabled in sip.conf for the same. Dialplan looks like Exten => 100,1,MeetMe(100,dmF) Sip.conf dtmfmode=info Regards, Rajib Rajib Deka SIEMENS Ltd. Robert V Chandran Tower, First Floor, West Wing, #149, Velechery

Hello List, I have seen from the following link that, for SIP channels there is no audio communication possible in MeetMe with AGI_BACKGROUND. http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+cmd+MeetMe Currently we are using asterisk-1.6.2 and the problem still persists. Is there any solution available to overcome this problem? According to our requirement, we have to run an AGI script in MeetMe.

Hi List, I have faced a problem in asterisk queue implementation. I configured a queue with 'ringall' strategy and 'ringinuse=yes' in queues.conf. If three calls come to this queue in parallel, the logged in queue agent used to get only one call (may be the first one), not all the calls waiting in the queue at a time. Once the agent answers the call the next call is displayed. I

Hello List, Is it possible to run an AGI script in backgroung for all the associated SIP channels in ConfBridge Application? If yes how? This can be done using 'b' parameter in MeetMe for non SIP channels. Regards, Rajib Rajib Deka SIEMENS Ltd. Robert V Chandran Tower, First Floor, West Wing, #149, Velechery Tambaram Main Road, Pallikaranai, Chennai-100, INDIA.

Hello List, What version of DAHDi should be installed for CentOS Kernel version 2.16.18-194.el5. We do not have access to yum in our network, so we need to install a specific version with respect to kernel version. Or, what update to be downloaded and applied to CentOS kernel to install a specific version of DAHDi. Regards, Rajib Rajib Deka SIEMENS Ltd. Robert V Chandran Tower, First Floor,

Hello List, Asterisk CLI command "core show hints" gives the list of hint extension configured and its presence status. In command output there is a field called "watchers" and it contains a numeric value of number of subscriptions' registered for that particular extension. So, is there any CLI command to check who the watchers for an extension are? Regards, Rajib Rajib

Thank you Paul. I have downloaded the code. How out-of-call messaging can be configured in the Dialplan? Regards, Rajib Deka SIEMENS Ltd. Robert V Chandran Tower, First Floor, West Wing, #149, Velechery Tambaram Main Road, Pallikaranai, Chennai-100, INDIA. www.siemens.com Mob: +91-9176780669 | E-Mail: rajib.deka at siemens.com Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2011 10:14:37 -0400 From: Paul Belanger

Hello List, In our lab asterisk has crashed due to some unknown reason and it has been restarted by safe_asterisk service. But before crash we can see lots of below log entry (asterisk version 1.8.9.3). Sep 3 07:55:21] WARNING[16287] res_rtp_asterisk.c: RTP Transmission error of packet to [2002:c117:a683::c117:a683]:20940: Address family not supported by protocol chan_sip.c: Purely numeric

Hello List, We are running two asterisk machines in virtual IP as primary and secondary server. Initially virtual IP will be active in primary server; during the failure of primary secondary will get the virtual IP. Is there any way to retrieve pending queue calls from primary to secondary, in case primary fails? Does asterisk provide any interface to do it or we have to write some application

Hello List, I have found that asterisk supports only forwards in-dialog MESSAGE method. That is, if the MESSAGE method is sent within an active call. But according our requirement we need to send MESSAGE method to the other leg without being in a call (general stateless proxy forward). Is it possible to do this in asterisk using some tricks? Regards, Rajib Deka SIEMENS Ltd. Robert V Chandran

Dear Forum, I have encountered a similar issue as below in Asterisk 10.0.0. Asterisk crashed while executing "meetme kick all" CLI command from manager interface. The link says the issue has been closed however I am not able to identify in which release of asterisk this issue has been fixed. Please help. https://issues.asterisk.org/jira/browse/ASTERISK-15741 With best regards, Rajib

Hello List, I have a requirement like, Only one UA can register at a time (the registration should be independent of IP). If some other UA tries to register from a different IP using the same credentials, it should be blocked by asterisk. We do not want to permit or block any IP or subnet in sip.conf. Following is an example of sip user configuration, [217] type=friend username=217 host=dynamic

Hello List, Please help with the following problem, I have a situation, where I need to play an audio announcement to the caller SIP channel once an attended transfer is successful. The attended transfer is done from client. I can see a transfer event in AMI. I am not using 'T/t' option in dial() command. The transfer is completely on client side using SIP signaling. 1. A calls B 2. B

Hello List, I am facing some issue while passing DTMF (RFC2833 set globally in sip.conf) in meetme (asterisk 1.8). The issue I have observed that - if two users tries to pass DTMF simultaneously at the same time from their phones only one DTMF is detected in asterisk and broadcasted to other users. Other DTMF lost somewhere. We have tested only with sip phones. Can someone help me with this, or

Doh. I missed the list in my first reply... Here's the replay of the conversation: ----- Renato: On 10 August 2015 at 14:05, Krzysztof Parzyszek via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > --> %SP<def,tied1> = t2LDMIA_RET %SP<tied0>, pred:8, pred:%CPSR, > %R7<def>, %PC<def>, %SP<imp-use,undef>, %R7<imp-use,undef>, >

Why do these two guys take a pointer to the basic block, whereas all other BuildMI functions take a reference? They are not checking for null or anything and I didn't see any potential declaration conflicts. Am I missing something? Is there a reason for this? inline MachineInstrBuilder BuildMI(MachineBasicBlock *BB, DebugLoc DL,

Hi, I had (naively?) expected that the instruction to move immediate to register or memory (such as MOV32mi, MOV32ri, MOV64mi32, MOV64ri, MOV64ri32) would be marked with the flag MCID::MovImm via the X86InstrInfo.td (and hence in the generated X86GenInstrInfo.inc). I do not see that to be the case. Can someone please tell me if my expectation is flawed? Is there a better/different way to

That flag is specifically used by the foldImmediate optimization in the Peephole pass. We don't implement the TLI foldImmediate hook the peephole pass uses on x86 so we have no reason to set the flag on any instructions What are you trying to do? ~Craig On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 11:45 AM, S. Bharadwaj Yadavalli via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Hi, > > I had

I think even if we did use it, MoveImmediate is intended for instructions that move an immediate into a register rather than into memory. It's supposed to indicate instructions that can be folded with the user of the register by changing the user to an immediate instruction. And it wouldn't be set on an instruction like "addl $0, %eax" or "addl $0, (%ecx)" either since